膝关节力感测量方法的验证及在膝关节骨性关节炎患者中的应用。

IF 1.8 4区 计算机科学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1155/abb/8851877
Zhixin Jin, Jingnan Shi, Haohua Zhang, Xinglong Zhou, Kuan Zhang, Songhua Yan
{"title":"膝关节力感测量方法的验证及在膝关节骨性关节炎患者中的应用。","authors":"Zhixin Jin, Jingnan Shi, Haohua Zhang, Xinglong Zhou, Kuan Zhang, Songhua Yan","doi":"10.1155/abb/8851877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Force sense reflects the efferent activity capacity of proprioception. Currently, methods for measuring force sense in the knee joint is lack. This study aims to validate a constructed test system and to explore the characteristics of force sense in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). <b>Methods:</b> Seventy-five subjects were recruited: 30 for verifying the reliability of test system and exploring the impact of body mass index (BMI) and the striking force on force sense; 20 healthy adults and 25 KOA patients for the method application. The force sense test system comprised a self-designed force application apparatus and a wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) device (DELSYS Inc, USA). The reflex contraction latency of muscles was considered as the force sense. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to verify the reliability. <b>Results:</b> The reflex contraction latencies of biceps femoris (BF) was the shortest and ICC in the two tests is 0.950 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences in force sense were found between different BMI groups (<i>p</i>=0.065), and there was no notable interaction between BMI and striking force (<i>p</i>=0.283). A significant difference in force sense was observed between different striking forces (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no significant differences in force sense of bilateral sides between healthy people and KOA patients (<i>p</i>=0.126, <i>p</i>=0.315). <b>Conclusion:</b> The force sense testing method established in this study is applicable for measuring knee joint force sense. BMI did not affect knee joint force sense but striking force did, and subjects with different BMI chose the same striking force; KOA did not influence the force sense of knee joint.</p>","PeriodicalId":8029,"journal":{"name":"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics","volume":"2025 ","pages":"8851877"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245506/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validation on Method of Measuring the Knee Joint Force Sense and Application in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.\",\"authors\":\"Zhixin Jin, Jingnan Shi, Haohua Zhang, Xinglong Zhou, Kuan Zhang, Songhua Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/abb/8851877\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Force sense reflects the efferent activity capacity of proprioception. Currently, methods for measuring force sense in the knee joint is lack. This study aims to validate a constructed test system and to explore the characteristics of force sense in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). <b>Methods:</b> Seventy-five subjects were recruited: 30 for verifying the reliability of test system and exploring the impact of body mass index (BMI) and the striking force on force sense; 20 healthy adults and 25 KOA patients for the method application. The force sense test system comprised a self-designed force application apparatus and a wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) device (DELSYS Inc, USA). The reflex contraction latency of muscles was considered as the force sense. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to verify the reliability. <b>Results:</b> The reflex contraction latencies of biceps femoris (BF) was the shortest and ICC in the two tests is 0.950 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). No significant differences in force sense were found between different BMI groups (<i>p</i>=0.065), and there was no notable interaction between BMI and striking force (<i>p</i>=0.283). A significant difference in force sense was observed between different striking forces (<i>p</i> < 0.001). There were no significant differences in force sense of bilateral sides between healthy people and KOA patients (<i>p</i>=0.126, <i>p</i>=0.315). <b>Conclusion:</b> The force sense testing method established in this study is applicable for measuring knee joint force sense. BMI did not affect knee joint force sense but striking force did, and subjects with different BMI chose the same striking force; KOA did not influence the force sense of knee joint.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics\",\"volume\":\"2025 \",\"pages\":\"8851877\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12245506/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1155/abb/8851877\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Bionics and Biomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/abb/8851877","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:力感反映了本体感觉的传出活动能力。目前,缺乏测量膝关节力感的方法。本研究旨在验证所构建的测试系统,并探讨膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)患者的力感特征。方法:共招募75名受试者,其中30人用于验证测试系统的信度,探讨身体质量指数(BMI)和击打力对力感的影响;20例健康成人和25例KOA患者应用该方法。力感测试系统包括一个自行设计的力施加装置和一个无线表面肌电图(sEMG)装置(DELSYS公司,美国)。肌肉的反射性收缩潜伏期被认为是力感。采用类内相关系数(ICC)验证信度。结果:股骨二头肌(BF)反射收缩潜伏期最短,ICC为0.950 (p < 0.001)。不同BMI组之间的力感差异无统计学意义(p=0.065), BMI与打击力之间无显著交互作用(p=0.283)。不同打击力对力感的影响差异有统计学意义(p < 0.001)。健康人与KOA患者双侧用力感差异无统计学意义(p=0.126, p=0.315)。结论:本研究建立的力感测试方法适用于膝关节力感测试。BMI对膝关节力感没有影响,但打击力有影响,不同BMI的被试选择相同的打击力;KOA对膝关节的力感没有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validation on Method of Measuring the Knee Joint Force Sense and Application in Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis.

Background: Force sense reflects the efferent activity capacity of proprioception. Currently, methods for measuring force sense in the knee joint is lack. This study aims to validate a constructed test system and to explore the characteristics of force sense in patients with knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Methods: Seventy-five subjects were recruited: 30 for verifying the reliability of test system and exploring the impact of body mass index (BMI) and the striking force on force sense; 20 healthy adults and 25 KOA patients for the method application. The force sense test system comprised a self-designed force application apparatus and a wireless surface electromyography (sEMG) device (DELSYS Inc, USA). The reflex contraction latency of muscles was considered as the force sense. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was used to verify the reliability. Results: The reflex contraction latencies of biceps femoris (BF) was the shortest and ICC in the two tests is 0.950 (p < 0.001). No significant differences in force sense were found between different BMI groups (p=0.065), and there was no notable interaction between BMI and striking force (p=0.283). A significant difference in force sense was observed between different striking forces (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences in force sense of bilateral sides between healthy people and KOA patients (p=0.126, p=0.315). Conclusion: The force sense testing method established in this study is applicable for measuring knee joint force sense. BMI did not affect knee joint force sense but striking force did, and subjects with different BMI chose the same striking force; KOA did not influence the force sense of knee joint.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics
Applied Bionics and Biomechanics ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-ROBOTICS
自引率
4.50%
发文量
338
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Applied Bionics and Biomechanics publishes papers that seek to understand the mechanics of biological systems, or that use the functions of living organisms as inspiration for the design new devices. Such systems may be used as artificial replacements, or aids, for their original biological purpose, or be used in a different setting altogether.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信