孕早期护理点超声:与诊断准确性相关的成像特征和复查行为。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Gillian Sheppard, Lori Stolz, Jeremy S Boyd, Martin Pusic, Jessica Baez, Patrick Minges, Matthew Swarm, Megan Hilbert, Marisa O'Brien, Katie Harris, Catherine Varner, Constance LeBlanc, Kathy Boutis
{"title":"孕早期护理点超声:与诊断准确性相关的成像特征和复查行为。","authors":"Gillian Sheppard, Lori Stolz, Jeremy S Boyd, Martin Pusic, Jessica Baez, Patrick Minges, Matthew Swarm, Megan Hilbert, Marisa O'Brien, Katie Harris, Catherine Varner, Constance LeBlanc, Kathy Boutis","doi":"10.1111/acem.70094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to identify the most diagnostically challenging features in first-trimester point-of-care ultrasound (FT-POCUS) images. We also sought to determine the physician image review behaviors associated with increased diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study in a convenience sample of emergency physicians in the United States and Canada. The web-based intervention included 400 FT-POCUS cases acquired via the transabdominal or transvaginal approach. Participants reviewed FT-POCUS cases to identify pregnancy-related imaging findings. We captured clickstream-level data with each case encounter, including the correctness of a participant's response and physician image review behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 317 participants, who collectively generated 16,295 case interpretations. The most diagnostically challenging imaging findings included eccentrically located gestational sac and endometrial collection/heterogeneous uterine material (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Participants who reported \"definite\" certainty, as opposed to \"probable,\" demonstrated a significantly higher odds of getting the diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) present or absent correct (OR = 4.48; 95% CI 4.00, 5.01) and a lower odds of time spent reviewing cases (OR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.40, 0.51). Those who reviewed a higher proportion of available views per case were more likely to accurately identify a fetal heartbeat (OR = 1.51; 95% 1.34, 1.69), multiple IUPs (OR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.10, 1.61), and adnexal structures (OR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.04, 1.17), but less likely to correctly identify an IUP (OR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.88, 0.99) and endometrial fluid collection/heterogeneous uterine material (OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency physicians interpreting FT-POCUS images encountered specific diagnostic challenges that may increase risks to patient safety. We found that higher diagnostic confidence correlated with greater diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Reviewing a larger proportion of available images improved diagnostic accuracy for some findings, but not for others.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"First Trimester Point of Care Ultrasound: Imaging Features and Review Behaviors Associated With Diagnostic Accuracy.\",\"authors\":\"Gillian Sheppard, Lori Stolz, Jeremy S Boyd, Martin Pusic, Jessica Baez, Patrick Minges, Matthew Swarm, Megan Hilbert, Marisa O'Brien, Katie Harris, Catherine Varner, Constance LeBlanc, Kathy Boutis\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/acem.70094\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We aimed to identify the most diagnostically challenging features in first-trimester point-of-care ultrasound (FT-POCUS) images. We also sought to determine the physician image review behaviors associated with increased diagnostic accuracy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study in a convenience sample of emergency physicians in the United States and Canada. The web-based intervention included 400 FT-POCUS cases acquired via the transabdominal or transvaginal approach. Participants reviewed FT-POCUS cases to identify pregnancy-related imaging findings. We captured clickstream-level data with each case encounter, including the correctness of a participant's response and physician image review behaviors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We enrolled 317 participants, who collectively generated 16,295 case interpretations. The most diagnostically challenging imaging findings included eccentrically located gestational sac and endometrial collection/heterogeneous uterine material (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Participants who reported \\\"definite\\\" certainty, as opposed to \\\"probable,\\\" demonstrated a significantly higher odds of getting the diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) present or absent correct (OR = 4.48; 95% CI 4.00, 5.01) and a lower odds of time spent reviewing cases (OR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.40, 0.51). Those who reviewed a higher proportion of available views per case were more likely to accurately identify a fetal heartbeat (OR = 1.51; 95% 1.34, 1.69), multiple IUPs (OR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.10, 1.61), and adnexal structures (OR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.04, 1.17), but less likely to correctly identify an IUP (OR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.88, 0.99) and endometrial fluid collection/heterogeneous uterine material (OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Emergency physicians interpreting FT-POCUS images encountered specific diagnostic challenges that may increase risks to patient safety. We found that higher diagnostic confidence correlated with greater diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Reviewing a larger proportion of available images improved diagnostic accuracy for some findings, but not for others.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7105,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Emergency Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70094\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EMERGENCY MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.70094","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:我们的目的是确定早期妊娠点超声(FT-POCUS)图像中最具诊断挑战性的特征。我们还试图确定与提高诊断准确性相关的医生图像审查行为。方法:我们在美国和加拿大的急诊医生中进行了一项多中心前瞻性横断面研究。基于网络的干预包括400例经腹或经阴道入路获得的FT-POCUS病例。参与者回顾FT-POCUS病例,以确定与妊娠相关的影像学发现。我们捕获了每个病例的点击流级数据,包括参与者反应的正确性和医生图像审查行为。结果:我们招募了317名参与者,共产生了16,295例病例解释。诊断上最具挑战性的影像学发现包括偏心位置的妊娠囊和子宫内膜收集/异质子宫材料(p结论:急诊医生在解释FT-POCUS图像时遇到了特定的诊断挑战,这可能会增加患者安全的风险。我们发现更高的诊断信心与更高的诊断准确性和效率相关。回顾更大比例的可用图像提高了某些发现的诊断准确性,但对其他发现却没有。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
First Trimester Point of Care Ultrasound: Imaging Features and Review Behaviors Associated With Diagnostic Accuracy.

Objectives: We aimed to identify the most diagnostically challenging features in first-trimester point-of-care ultrasound (FT-POCUS) images. We also sought to determine the physician image review behaviors associated with increased diagnostic accuracy.

Methods: We conducted a multicenter prospective cross-sectional study in a convenience sample of emergency physicians in the United States and Canada. The web-based intervention included 400 FT-POCUS cases acquired via the transabdominal or transvaginal approach. Participants reviewed FT-POCUS cases to identify pregnancy-related imaging findings. We captured clickstream-level data with each case encounter, including the correctness of a participant's response and physician image review behaviors.

Results: We enrolled 317 participants, who collectively generated 16,295 case interpretations. The most diagnostically challenging imaging findings included eccentrically located gestational sac and endometrial collection/heterogeneous uterine material (p < 0.001 for all comparisons). Participants who reported "definite" certainty, as opposed to "probable," demonstrated a significantly higher odds of getting the diagnosis of intrauterine pregnancy (IUP) present or absent correct (OR = 4.48; 95% CI 4.00, 5.01) and a lower odds of time spent reviewing cases (OR = 0.46; 95% CI 0.40, 0.51). Those who reviewed a higher proportion of available views per case were more likely to accurately identify a fetal heartbeat (OR = 1.51; 95% 1.34, 1.69), multiple IUPs (OR = 1.33; 95% CI 1.10, 1.61), and adnexal structures (OR = 1.11; 95% CI 1.04, 1.17), but less likely to correctly identify an IUP (OR = 0.93; 95% CI 0.88, 0.99) and endometrial fluid collection/heterogeneous uterine material (OR = 0.96; 95% CI 0.92, 0.99).

Conclusions: Emergency physicians interpreting FT-POCUS images encountered specific diagnostic challenges that may increase risks to patient safety. We found that higher diagnostic confidence correlated with greater diagnostic accuracy and efficiency. Reviewing a larger proportion of available images improved diagnostic accuracy for some findings, but not for others.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Emergency Medicine
Academic Emergency Medicine 医学-急救医学
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
6.80%
发文量
207
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine. The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more. Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信