破茧:基于扎根理论和结构方程模型验证的中国保险业职业污名化的双路径探索

IF 6.9 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Yuanchao Zhang , Xinlei Huang , Ying Ji
{"title":"破茧:基于扎根理论和结构方程模型验证的中国保险业职业污名化的双路径探索","authors":"Yuanchao Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinlei Huang ,&nbsp;Ying Ji","doi":"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores the formation mechanism of occupational stigma in China’s insurance industry and its impact on practitioners’ psychological state, particularly in terms of professional identity. Using qualitative research based on grounded theory, this study conducts in-depth interviews with 64 insurance practitioners to identify key influencing factors. Combined with a structural equation model (SEM), we analyze 427 questionnaires to construct a model of the impact mechanism of occupational stigma. The results of SEM analysis demonstrate that occupational stigma indirectly affects professional identity by reducing persuasion self-efficacy. Furthermore, perceived organizational support has a moderating influence on the relationship between occupational stigma and persuasion self-efficacy. High-level organizational support can effectively alleviate the negative impact of occupational stigma on persuasion self-efficacy, weakening the indirect damage of occupational stigma to professional identity. This study constructs a theoretical framework for understanding the occupational stigma of China’s insurance industry and its impact mechanism and provides strategic suggestions for the industry’s management practice.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12167,"journal":{"name":"Finance Research Letters","volume":"85 ","pages":"Article 107892"},"PeriodicalIF":6.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cocoon breaking: A dual-path exploration of occupational stigma in China’s insurance industry using grounded theory and structural equation model verification\",\"authors\":\"Yuanchao Zhang ,&nbsp;Xinlei Huang ,&nbsp;Ying Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.frl.2025.107892\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores the formation mechanism of occupational stigma in China’s insurance industry and its impact on practitioners’ psychological state, particularly in terms of professional identity. Using qualitative research based on grounded theory, this study conducts in-depth interviews with 64 insurance practitioners to identify key influencing factors. Combined with a structural equation model (SEM), we analyze 427 questionnaires to construct a model of the impact mechanism of occupational stigma. The results of SEM analysis demonstrate that occupational stigma indirectly affects professional identity by reducing persuasion self-efficacy. Furthermore, perceived organizational support has a moderating influence on the relationship between occupational stigma and persuasion self-efficacy. High-level organizational support can effectively alleviate the negative impact of occupational stigma on persuasion self-efficacy, weakening the indirect damage of occupational stigma to professional identity. This study constructs a theoretical framework for understanding the occupational stigma of China’s insurance industry and its impact mechanism and provides strategic suggestions for the industry’s management practice.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"85 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107892\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Finance Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154461232501150X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Finance Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S154461232501150X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在探讨中国保险业职业污名的形成机制及其对从业人员心理状态的影响,特别是职业认同方面的影响。本研究采用扎根理论为基础的定性研究方法,对64位保险从业人员进行深度访谈,找出关键影响因素。结合结构方程模型(SEM),对427份问卷进行分析,构建职业污名的影响机制模型。SEM分析结果表明,职业污名通过降低说服自我效能间接影响职业认同。此外,组织支持感对职业耻辱感与说服自我效能感之间的关系具有调节作用。高水平组织支持可以有效缓解职业污名对说服自我效能的负面影响,减弱职业污名对职业认同的间接伤害。本研究为理解中国保险业职业污名化及其影响机制构建了理论框架,并为行业管理实践提供了战略建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cocoon breaking: A dual-path exploration of occupational stigma in China’s insurance industry using grounded theory and structural equation model verification
This study explores the formation mechanism of occupational stigma in China’s insurance industry and its impact on practitioners’ psychological state, particularly in terms of professional identity. Using qualitative research based on grounded theory, this study conducts in-depth interviews with 64 insurance practitioners to identify key influencing factors. Combined with a structural equation model (SEM), we analyze 427 questionnaires to construct a model of the impact mechanism of occupational stigma. The results of SEM analysis demonstrate that occupational stigma indirectly affects professional identity by reducing persuasion self-efficacy. Furthermore, perceived organizational support has a moderating influence on the relationship between occupational stigma and persuasion self-efficacy. High-level organizational support can effectively alleviate the negative impact of occupational stigma on persuasion self-efficacy, weakening the indirect damage of occupational stigma to professional identity. This study constructs a theoretical framework for understanding the occupational stigma of China’s insurance industry and its impact mechanism and provides strategic suggestions for the industry’s management practice.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Finance Research Letters
Finance Research Letters BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
14.40%
发文量
863
期刊介绍: Finance Research Letters welcomes submissions across all areas of finance, aiming for rapid publication of significant new findings. The journal particularly encourages papers that provide insight into the replicability of established results, examine the cross-national applicability of previous findings, challenge existing methodologies, or demonstrate methodological contingencies. Papers are invited in the following areas: Actuarial studies Alternative investments Asset Pricing Bankruptcy and liquidation Banks and other Depository Institutions Behavioral and experimental finance Bibliometric and Scientometric studies of finance Capital budgeting and corporate investment Capital markets and accounting Capital structure and payout policy Commodities Contagion, crises and interdependence Corporate governance Credit and fixed income markets and instruments Derivatives Emerging markets Energy Finance and Energy Markets Financial Econometrics Financial History Financial intermediation and money markets Financial markets and marketplaces Financial Mathematics and Econophysics Financial Regulation and Law Forecasting Frontier market studies International Finance Market efficiency, event studies Mergers, acquisitions and the market for corporate control Micro Finance Institutions Microstructure Non-bank Financial Institutions Personal Finance Portfolio choice and investing Real estate finance and investing Risk SME, Family and Entrepreneurial Finance
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信