Felix Hochberger MD , Julian Hess MD , Christian Konrads MD , Tizian Heinz MD , Ella Segatz , Maximilian Rudert MD , Kilian List MD
{"title":"二头肌远端肌腱固定的短期临床和功能结果:全缝合与钛锚","authors":"Felix Hochberger MD , Julian Hess MD , Christian Konrads MD , Tizian Heinz MD , Ella Segatz , Maximilian Rudert MD , Kilian List MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.03.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The objective of this study was to evaluate the preliminary clinical and functional outcomes of patients with distal biceps tendon ruptures undergoing surgical fixation using 2 intramedullary all-suture anchors (ASAs) and to compare these outcomes with a control group treated with 2 intramedullary titanium anchors (TAs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective case series was conducted on patients who underwent distal biceps tendon fixation using either TAs (Mitek Sports Medicine, Raynham, MA, USA) or ASAs (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 24 months, using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, and visual analog scale. Secondary assessments included isometric strength testing with the IsoForce Control Dynamometer (IsoForce, Dübendorf, Switzerland) and the identification of postoperative complications, such as heterotopic ossification (HO).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 53 patients (23 ASA, 30 TA) were included in the final analysis, with ASA patients being slightly younger (55.2 ± 9.8 years vs. 63.2 ± 7.7 years, <em>P</em> < .05) and the only group to include females (4), as the TA cohort comprised exclusively male patients. The average follow-up duration was 33.8 ± 9.3 months for the ASA group and 45.4 ± 11.1 months for the TA group. HOs were significantly more prevalent in the TA group (37.5% vs. 17.2%, <em>P</em> < .05). Functional outcomes, measured by Mayo Elbow Performance Score and QuickDASH, and strength recovery ratios were comparable across both groups, though ASA patients demonstrated higher absolute isometric strength values at specific flexion angles (<em>P</em> < .05). Both anchor systems delivered equivalent functional and clinical outcomes after 1 year postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both, ASAs and TAs, achieved excellent functional and clinical outcomes in distal biceps tendon fixation with low complication rates. ASA demonstrated significant fewer HOs compared to TA.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 1400-1405"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Short-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon fixation: all-suture vs. titanium anchors\",\"authors\":\"Felix Hochberger MD , Julian Hess MD , Christian Konrads MD , Tizian Heinz MD , Ella Segatz , Maximilian Rudert MD , Kilian List MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.03.012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The objective of this study was to evaluate the preliminary clinical and functional outcomes of patients with distal biceps tendon ruptures undergoing surgical fixation using 2 intramedullary all-suture anchors (ASAs) and to compare these outcomes with a control group treated with 2 intramedullary titanium anchors (TAs).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective case series was conducted on patients who underwent distal biceps tendon fixation using either TAs (Mitek Sports Medicine, Raynham, MA, USA) or ASAs (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 24 months, using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, and visual analog scale. Secondary assessments included isometric strength testing with the IsoForce Control Dynamometer (IsoForce, Dübendorf, Switzerland) and the identification of postoperative complications, such as heterotopic ossification (HO).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 53 patients (23 ASA, 30 TA) were included in the final analysis, with ASA patients being slightly younger (55.2 ± 9.8 years vs. 63.2 ± 7.7 years, <em>P</em> < .05) and the only group to include females (4), as the TA cohort comprised exclusively male patients. The average follow-up duration was 33.8 ± 9.3 months for the ASA group and 45.4 ± 11.1 months for the TA group. HOs were significantly more prevalent in the TA group (37.5% vs. 17.2%, <em>P</em> < .05). Functional outcomes, measured by Mayo Elbow Performance Score and QuickDASH, and strength recovery ratios were comparable across both groups, though ASA patients demonstrated higher absolute isometric strength values at specific flexion angles (<em>P</em> < .05). Both anchor systems delivered equivalent functional and clinical outcomes after 1 year postoperatively.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Both, ASAs and TAs, achieved excellent functional and clinical outcomes in distal biceps tendon fixation with low complication rates. ASA demonstrated significant fewer HOs compared to TA.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES International\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1400-1405\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325000945\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325000945","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本研究的目的是评估二头肌腱远端断裂患者使用2个髓内全缝合锚钉(ASAs)手术固定的初步临床和功能结果,并将这些结果与使用2个髓内钛锚钉(TAs)治疗的对照组进行比较。方法回顾性分析采用TAs (Mitek运动医学公司,美国马萨诸塞州雷纳姆)或ASAs (Arthrex公司,美国佛罗里达州那不勒斯)进行肱二头肌腱远端固定的患者。临床和功能结果在平均24个月的随访中进行评估,使用Mayo肘部表现评分、手臂、肩膀和手的快速残疾问卷和视觉模拟量表。二次评估包括使用IsoForce控制测力仪(IsoForce, d bendorf,瑞士)进行等距强度测试,并确定术后并发症,如异位骨化(HO)。结果共纳入53例患者(ASA 23例,TA 30例),ASA患者年龄稍轻(55.2±9.8岁∶63.2±7.7岁,P <;.05)和唯一包括女性的组(4),因为TA队列完全由男性患者组成。ASA组和TA组的平均随访时间分别为33.8±9.3个月和45.4±11.1个月。HOs在TA组更为普遍(37.5% vs. 17.2%, P <;. 05)。尽管ASA患者在特定屈曲角度表现出更高的绝对等长强度值(P <;. 05)。两种锚定系统在术后1年后的功能和临床结果相同。结论asa和TAs在肱二头肌远端肌腱固定中均具有良好的功能和临床效果,并发症发生率低。ASA与TA相比,HOs明显减少。
Short-term clinical and functional outcomes of distal biceps tendon fixation: all-suture vs. titanium anchors
Background
The objective of this study was to evaluate the preliminary clinical and functional outcomes of patients with distal biceps tendon ruptures undergoing surgical fixation using 2 intramedullary all-suture anchors (ASAs) and to compare these outcomes with a control group treated with 2 intramedullary titanium anchors (TAs).
Methods
A retrospective case series was conducted on patients who underwent distal biceps tendon fixation using either TAs (Mitek Sports Medicine, Raynham, MA, USA) or ASAs (Arthrex, Naples, FL, USA). Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated at a mean follow-up of 24 months, using the Mayo Elbow Performance Score, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand Questionnaire, and visual analog scale. Secondary assessments included isometric strength testing with the IsoForce Control Dynamometer (IsoForce, Dübendorf, Switzerland) and the identification of postoperative complications, such as heterotopic ossification (HO).
Results
A total of 53 patients (23 ASA, 30 TA) were included in the final analysis, with ASA patients being slightly younger (55.2 ± 9.8 years vs. 63.2 ± 7.7 years, P < .05) and the only group to include females (4), as the TA cohort comprised exclusively male patients. The average follow-up duration was 33.8 ± 9.3 months for the ASA group and 45.4 ± 11.1 months for the TA group. HOs were significantly more prevalent in the TA group (37.5% vs. 17.2%, P < .05). Functional outcomes, measured by Mayo Elbow Performance Score and QuickDASH, and strength recovery ratios were comparable across both groups, though ASA patients demonstrated higher absolute isometric strength values at specific flexion angles (P < .05). Both anchor systems delivered equivalent functional and clinical outcomes after 1 year postoperatively.
Conclusion
Both, ASAs and TAs, achieved excellent functional and clinical outcomes in distal biceps tendon fixation with low complication rates. ASA demonstrated significant fewer HOs compared to TA.