不同荣誉规范的文化中道歉信念对道歉倾向的作用

IF 2.2
Alexander Kirchner-Häusler , Ayse K. Uskul , Michael J.A. Wohl , Vivian L. Vignoles , Susan E. Cross , Rosa Rodriguez-Bailón , Meral Gezici-Yalçın , Charles Harb , Shenel Husnu , Konstantinos Kafetsios , Evangelia Kateri , Juan Matamoros-Lima , Rania Miniesy , Jinkyung Na , Stefano Pagliaro , Charis Psaltis , Dina Rabie , Manuel Teresi , Yukiko Uchida
{"title":"不同荣誉规范的文化中道歉信念对道歉倾向的作用","authors":"Alexander Kirchner-Häusler ,&nbsp;Ayse K. Uskul ,&nbsp;Michael J.A. Wohl ,&nbsp;Vivian L. Vignoles ,&nbsp;Susan E. Cross ,&nbsp;Rosa Rodriguez-Bailón ,&nbsp;Meral Gezici-Yalçın ,&nbsp;Charles Harb ,&nbsp;Shenel Husnu ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Kafetsios ,&nbsp;Evangelia Kateri ,&nbsp;Juan Matamoros-Lima ,&nbsp;Rania Miniesy ,&nbsp;Jinkyung Na ,&nbsp;Stefano Pagliaro ,&nbsp;Charis Psaltis ,&nbsp;Dina Rabie ,&nbsp;Manuel Teresi ,&nbsp;Yukiko Uchida","doi":"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Apologies serve as crucial tools for relationship repair, promoting reconciliation, and demonstrating accountability. However, beliefs about the morality, effectiveness, and responsibility-signaling nature of apologies may vary across cultures, particularly in contexts shaped by honor norms where apologies fit central cultural concerns for morality and strength in ambiguous ways. This study investigates the relation between apology beliefs and cultural honor norms across 14 Mediterranean, East Asian, and Anglo-Western samples (<em>N</em> = 5296). We assessed personal and normative beliefs about apologies and their alignment with apology tendencies (willingness to apologize and past offered apologies) as well as intersubjectively rated honor norms. Results revealed that stronger beliefs in the morality and effectiveness of apologies, as well as perceptions of apologies as admissions of responsibility, consistently predicted greater willingness to apologize across regions and past apologies offered. Against our expectations, honor norms moderated only a few of these relations, with significant interactions suggesting weaker links between apology beliefs and apology tendencies at stronger honor norms. Complementary analyses comparing regional categorizations (Anglo-West, East Asia, and MENA) further supported a picture of relative cultural similarities but also highlighted a wider array of relevant apology beliefs in the MENA region as well as a greater focus on personal morality beliefs in Anglo Western societies and personal effectiveness beliefs in East Asian societies. Our findings underscore the universal significance of apology beliefs in fostering reconciliation while also revealing some cultural variability in how personal beliefs and cultural norms may interact in shaping apology-related behaviors across diverse societies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":72748,"journal":{"name":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The role of apology beliefs for apology tendencies across cultures with varying honor norms\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Kirchner-Häusler ,&nbsp;Ayse K. Uskul ,&nbsp;Michael J.A. Wohl ,&nbsp;Vivian L. Vignoles ,&nbsp;Susan E. Cross ,&nbsp;Rosa Rodriguez-Bailón ,&nbsp;Meral Gezici-Yalçın ,&nbsp;Charles Harb ,&nbsp;Shenel Husnu ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Kafetsios ,&nbsp;Evangelia Kateri ,&nbsp;Juan Matamoros-Lima ,&nbsp;Rania Miniesy ,&nbsp;Jinkyung Na ,&nbsp;Stefano Pagliaro ,&nbsp;Charis Psaltis ,&nbsp;Dina Rabie ,&nbsp;Manuel Teresi ,&nbsp;Yukiko Uchida\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.cresp.2025.100230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Apologies serve as crucial tools for relationship repair, promoting reconciliation, and demonstrating accountability. However, beliefs about the morality, effectiveness, and responsibility-signaling nature of apologies may vary across cultures, particularly in contexts shaped by honor norms where apologies fit central cultural concerns for morality and strength in ambiguous ways. This study investigates the relation between apology beliefs and cultural honor norms across 14 Mediterranean, East Asian, and Anglo-Western samples (<em>N</em> = 5296). We assessed personal and normative beliefs about apologies and their alignment with apology tendencies (willingness to apologize and past offered apologies) as well as intersubjectively rated honor norms. Results revealed that stronger beliefs in the morality and effectiveness of apologies, as well as perceptions of apologies as admissions of responsibility, consistently predicted greater willingness to apologize across regions and past apologies offered. Against our expectations, honor norms moderated only a few of these relations, with significant interactions suggesting weaker links between apology beliefs and apology tendencies at stronger honor norms. Complementary analyses comparing regional categorizations (Anglo-West, East Asia, and MENA) further supported a picture of relative cultural similarities but also highlighted a wider array of relevant apology beliefs in the MENA region as well as a greater focus on personal morality beliefs in Anglo Western societies and personal effectiveness beliefs in East Asian societies. Our findings underscore the universal significance of apology beliefs in fostering reconciliation while also revealing some cultural variability in how personal beliefs and cultural norms may interact in shaping apology-related behaviors across diverse societies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current research in ecological and social psychology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current research in ecological and social psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622725000176\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current research in ecological and social psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666622725000176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

道歉是修复关系、促进和解和证明责任的关键工具。然而,关于道歉的道德、有效性和责任信号性质的信念可能因文化而异,特别是在荣誉规范形成的背景下,道歉以模糊的方式符合道德和力量的核心文化关注。本研究调查了14个地中海、东亚和盎格鲁-西方样本(N = 5296)的道歉信念与文化荣誉规范的关系。我们评估了关于道歉的个人和规范性信念,以及它们与道歉倾向(道歉的意愿和过去的道歉)的一致性,以及主体间评价的荣誉规范。结果显示,对道歉的道德和有效性有更强的信念,以及将道歉视为承认责任的观念,一致预示着跨地区的更大的道歉意愿和过去的道歉。与我们的预期相反,荣誉规范只调节了这些关系中的一小部分,显著的相互作用表明,在更强的荣誉规范下,道歉信念和道歉倾向之间的联系较弱。比较区域分类(盎格鲁-西方、东亚和中东和北非)的补充分析进一步支持了相对的文化相似性,但也强调了中东和北非地区更广泛的相关道歉信念,以及更关注盎格鲁-西方社会的个人道德信念和东亚社会的个人效能信念。我们的研究结果强调了道歉信念在促进和解方面的普遍意义,同时也揭示了在不同社会中,个人信仰和文化规范如何在形成道歉相关行为方面相互作用的一些文化差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

The role of apology beliefs for apology tendencies across cultures with varying honor norms

The role of apology beliefs for apology tendencies across cultures with varying honor norms
Apologies serve as crucial tools for relationship repair, promoting reconciliation, and demonstrating accountability. However, beliefs about the morality, effectiveness, and responsibility-signaling nature of apologies may vary across cultures, particularly in contexts shaped by honor norms where apologies fit central cultural concerns for morality and strength in ambiguous ways. This study investigates the relation between apology beliefs and cultural honor norms across 14 Mediterranean, East Asian, and Anglo-Western samples (N = 5296). We assessed personal and normative beliefs about apologies and their alignment with apology tendencies (willingness to apologize and past offered apologies) as well as intersubjectively rated honor norms. Results revealed that stronger beliefs in the morality and effectiveness of apologies, as well as perceptions of apologies as admissions of responsibility, consistently predicted greater willingness to apologize across regions and past apologies offered. Against our expectations, honor norms moderated only a few of these relations, with significant interactions suggesting weaker links between apology beliefs and apology tendencies at stronger honor norms. Complementary analyses comparing regional categorizations (Anglo-West, East Asia, and MENA) further supported a picture of relative cultural similarities but also highlighted a wider array of relevant apology beliefs in the MENA region as well as a greater focus on personal morality beliefs in Anglo Western societies and personal effectiveness beliefs in East Asian societies. Our findings underscore the universal significance of apology beliefs in fostering reconciliation while also revealing some cultural variability in how personal beliefs and cultural norms may interact in shaping apology-related behaviors across diverse societies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
140 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信