评估机器学习预测两种不同肩假体的准确性:外部验证研究

Q2 Medicine
Gianluca Caprili MD , Andrea G. Calamita MD , Michele Novi MD , Domenico A. Campanacci MD, PhD , Simone Nicoletti MD
{"title":"评估机器学习预测两种不同肩假体的准确性:外部验证研究","authors":"Gianluca Caprili MD ,&nbsp;Andrea G. Calamita MD ,&nbsp;Michele Novi MD ,&nbsp;Domenico A. Campanacci MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Simone Nicoletti MD","doi":"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The integration of machine learning in orthopedic surgery, including shoulder procedures, has garnered increasing interest. This retrospective analysis aims to externally validate a predictive analytics platform within a patient cohort undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for eccentric or concentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ninety patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at our institution in 2022 were selected for this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of implant (50 Exactech Equinoxe and 40 Zimmer Biomet Comprehensive). Preoperative evaluations included 19 variables per the tool requirements (demographics, diagnosis, comorbidities, patient-reported pain and function, and range of motion). The study compared the tool's outcome predictions with postoperative outcomes at 3-6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postsurgery for visual analog scale and active range of movement. We also quantified the mean absolute error (MAE) separately in the 2 groups and compared it to the MAE from the internal validation of the same tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant improvements in visual analog scale, active forward elevation, active abduction, and active external rotation met the minimal clinically important difference at 3-6 months, 1 year, and 2 years in both implant groups. Additionally, a modest improvement in active internal rotation was observed in both cohorts. In terms of MAE, we found a higher error than the internal validation only for forward elevation at 3-6 months in group 2 and a lower error in all the other outcome measures at all time points for both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The predictive analytics platform demonstrated a lower or similar MAE than the internal validation for both groups. Notably, we found that the tool's predictions are generalizable to another shoulder prosthesis, even though it was not trained on that particular product. This tool holds promise for aiding clinicians in managing patient expectations.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34444,"journal":{"name":"JSES International","volume":"9 4","pages":"Pages 1352-1356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the accuracy of a machine learning prediction for 2 different shoulder prostheses: an external validation study\",\"authors\":\"Gianluca Caprili MD ,&nbsp;Andrea G. Calamita MD ,&nbsp;Michele Novi MD ,&nbsp;Domenico A. Campanacci MD, PhD ,&nbsp;Simone Nicoletti MD\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jseint.2025.04.024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The integration of machine learning in orthopedic surgery, including shoulder procedures, has garnered increasing interest. This retrospective analysis aims to externally validate a predictive analytics platform within a patient cohort undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for eccentric or concentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Ninety patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at our institution in 2022 were selected for this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of implant (50 Exactech Equinoxe and 40 Zimmer Biomet Comprehensive). Preoperative evaluations included 19 variables per the tool requirements (demographics, diagnosis, comorbidities, patient-reported pain and function, and range of motion). The study compared the tool's outcome predictions with postoperative outcomes at 3-6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postsurgery for visual analog scale and active range of movement. We also quantified the mean absolute error (MAE) separately in the 2 groups and compared it to the MAE from the internal validation of the same tool.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Significant improvements in visual analog scale, active forward elevation, active abduction, and active external rotation met the minimal clinically important difference at 3-6 months, 1 year, and 2 years in both implant groups. Additionally, a modest improvement in active internal rotation was observed in both cohorts. In terms of MAE, we found a higher error than the internal validation only for forward elevation at 3-6 months in group 2 and a lower error in all the other outcome measures at all time points for both groups.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The predictive analytics platform demonstrated a lower or similar MAE than the internal validation for both groups. Notably, we found that the tool's predictions are generalizable to another shoulder prosthesis, even though it was not trained on that particular product. This tool holds promise for aiding clinicians in managing patient expectations.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34444,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JSES International\",\"volume\":\"9 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 1352-1356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JSES International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325001495\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JSES International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666638325001495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

机器学习在骨科手术中的整合,包括肩部手术,已经引起了越来越多的兴趣。本回顾性分析旨在从外部验证对偏心或同心型盂肱骨关节炎患者进行反向全肩关节置换术的预测分析平台。方法选择2022年我院行逆行全肩关节置换术的患者90例作为研究对象。根据种植体类型将患者分为两组(Exactech Equinoxe 50例,Zimmer Biomet Comprehensive 40例)。术前评估根据工具要求包括19个变量(人口统计学、诊断、合并症、患者报告的疼痛和功能、活动范围)。该研究将该工具的预测结果与术后3-6个月、1年和2年的视觉模拟量表和活动范围进行了比较。我们还分别量化了两组的平均绝对误差(MAE),并将其与同一工具内部验证的MAE进行了比较。结果两组患者在3-6个月、1年和2年的视觉模拟评分、主动前仰、主动外展和主动外旋方面均有显著改善,达到最小的临床重要差异。此外,在两个队列中观察到主动内旋的适度改善。在MAE方面,我们发现第2组在3-6个月时仅向前抬高的误差高于内部验证,两组在所有时间点的所有其他结果测量误差均较低。结论预测分析平台对两组患者的MAE均低于或类似于内部验证。值得注意的是,我们发现该工具的预测可以推广到另一种肩部假体,即使它没有经过特定产品的训练。该工具有望帮助临床医生管理患者的期望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the accuracy of a machine learning prediction for 2 different shoulder prostheses: an external validation study

Background

The integration of machine learning in orthopedic surgery, including shoulder procedures, has garnered increasing interest. This retrospective analysis aims to externally validate a predictive analytics platform within a patient cohort undergoing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for eccentric or concentric glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

Methods

Ninety patients who underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty at our institution in 2022 were selected for this study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of implant (50 Exactech Equinoxe and 40 Zimmer Biomet Comprehensive). Preoperative evaluations included 19 variables per the tool requirements (demographics, diagnosis, comorbidities, patient-reported pain and function, and range of motion). The study compared the tool's outcome predictions with postoperative outcomes at 3-6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postsurgery for visual analog scale and active range of movement. We also quantified the mean absolute error (MAE) separately in the 2 groups and compared it to the MAE from the internal validation of the same tool.

Results

Significant improvements in visual analog scale, active forward elevation, active abduction, and active external rotation met the minimal clinically important difference at 3-6 months, 1 year, and 2 years in both implant groups. Additionally, a modest improvement in active internal rotation was observed in both cohorts. In terms of MAE, we found a higher error than the internal validation only for forward elevation at 3-6 months in group 2 and a lower error in all the other outcome measures at all time points for both groups.

Conclusion

The predictive analytics platform demonstrated a lower or similar MAE than the internal validation for both groups. Notably, we found that the tool's predictions are generalizable to another shoulder prosthesis, even though it was not trained on that particular product. This tool holds promise for aiding clinicians in managing patient expectations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JSES International
JSES International Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
174
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信