经低前通道的单端口机器人辅助输尿管再植:一步一步的程序和初步的比较结果

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Luca Lambertini , Giulio Avesani , Hakan Bahadir Haberal , Juan Ramon Torres Anguiano , Ruben Sauer Calvo , Luca Morgantini , Andrea Minervini , Simone Crivellaro
{"title":"经低前通道的单端口机器人辅助输尿管再植:一步一步的程序和初步的比较结果","authors":"Luca Lambertini ,&nbsp;Giulio Avesani ,&nbsp;Hakan Bahadir Haberal ,&nbsp;Juan Ramon Torres Anguiano ,&nbsp;Ruben Sauer Calvo ,&nbsp;Luca Morgantini ,&nbsp;Andrea Minervini ,&nbsp;Simone Crivellaro","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Multiport robotic management of distal ureteral strictures is still burdened by the mandatory transperitoneal approach and the steep Trendelenburg patient position. Our aim was to describe the largest series of patients treated with single-port robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation (SP-RAUR) via a supine extraperitoneal approach, with a focus on the surgical technique, perioperative surgical outcomes, and functional results.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and surgical procedure</h3><div>Clinical and surgical data for all consecutive adult patients treated with SP-RAUR between January 2021 and September 2023 were prospectively collected. Patients were stratified by surgical approach into low anterior access (LAA) and transperitoneal (TP) groups. Ureteral reimplantation was performed extraperitoneally with patients in a supine position.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Overall, 20 patients who underwent SP-RAUR and had minimum follow-up of 1 yr were included in the analysis, of whom 50% were treated via an LAA approach. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. No open conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. The operative time was shorter in the LAA group than in the TP group (165 vs 191 min; <em>p</em> = 0.01). In terms of perioperative features, the LAA approach was associated with lower postoperative pain and opioid use and shorter length of stay (8 vs 26.5 h; <em>p</em> = 0.016). No major postoperative complications or recurrent urinary obstruction were observed after median follow-up of 14.5 mo.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>SP-RAUR via LAA represents a feasible and safe procedure with potential to improve perioperative recovery for patients with a distal ureter stricture.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We assessed a new robot-assisted surgery technique to treat narrowing of the tube that drains urine from the kidney into the bladder. This technique uses just a single small incision. Our results show that the procedure is safe and that patients have a quick recovery and a fast return to everyday activities. Larger studies with more patients are needed to confirm these results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"78 ","pages":"Pages 51-58"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Single-port Robot-assisted Ureteral Reimplantation via Low Anterior Access: Step-by-step Procedure and Preliminary Comparative Results\",\"authors\":\"Luca Lambertini ,&nbsp;Giulio Avesani ,&nbsp;Hakan Bahadir Haberal ,&nbsp;Juan Ramon Torres Anguiano ,&nbsp;Ruben Sauer Calvo ,&nbsp;Luca Morgantini ,&nbsp;Andrea Minervini ,&nbsp;Simone Crivellaro\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euros.2025.06.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Multiport robotic management of distal ureteral strictures is still burdened by the mandatory transperitoneal approach and the steep Trendelenburg patient position. Our aim was to describe the largest series of patients treated with single-port robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation (SP-RAUR) via a supine extraperitoneal approach, with a focus on the surgical technique, perioperative surgical outcomes, and functional results.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and surgical procedure</h3><div>Clinical and surgical data for all consecutive adult patients treated with SP-RAUR between January 2021 and September 2023 were prospectively collected. Patients were stratified by surgical approach into low anterior access (LAA) and transperitoneal (TP) groups. Ureteral reimplantation was performed extraperitoneally with patients in a supine position.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>Overall, 20 patients who underwent SP-RAUR and had minimum follow-up of 1 yr were included in the analysis, of whom 50% were treated via an LAA approach. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. No open conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. The operative time was shorter in the LAA group than in the TP group (165 vs 191 min; <em>p</em> = 0.01). In terms of perioperative features, the LAA approach was associated with lower postoperative pain and opioid use and shorter length of stay (8 vs 26.5 h; <em>p</em> = 0.016). No major postoperative complications or recurrent urinary obstruction were observed after median follow-up of 14.5 mo.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>SP-RAUR via LAA represents a feasible and safe procedure with potential to improve perioperative recovery for patients with a distal ureter stricture.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>We assessed a new robot-assisted surgery technique to treat narrowing of the tube that drains urine from the kidney into the bladder. This technique uses just a single small incision. Our results show that the procedure is safe and that patients have a quick recovery and a fast return to everyday activities. Larger studies with more patients are needed to confirm these results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Urology Open Science\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-58\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Urology Open Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325001491\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325001491","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的输尿管远端狭窄的多通道机器人治疗仍然受到强制性经腹腔入路和患者陡峭的Trendelenburg体位的困扰。我们的目的是描述通过仰卧位腹腔外入路接受单端口机器人辅助输尿管再植术(SP-RAUR)治疗的最大系列患者,重点关注手术技术、围手术期手术结果和功能结果。前瞻性收集2021年1月至2023年9月期间连续接受SP-RAUR治疗的所有成年患者的临床和手术资料。患者按手术入路分为低前路(LAA)组和经腹腔(TP)组。输尿管再植术采用仰卧位腹膜外行。总体而言,20例接受SP-RAUR且至少随访1年的患者被纳入分析,其中50%通过LAA方法治疗。两组间基线特征无显著差异。无开放性转换及术中并发症发生。LAA组手术时间短于TP组(165 min vs 191 min;p = 0.01)。在围手术期特征方面,LAA入路术后疼痛和阿片类药物使用较低,住院时间较短(8 vs 26.5 h;p = 0.016)。中位随访14.5个月后,无重大术后并发症或复发性尿路梗阻。结论及临床意义经LAA行sp - raur是一种可行且安全的手术,有可能改善输尿管远端狭窄患者的围手术期恢复。我们评估了一种新的机器人辅助手术技术,用于治疗将尿液从肾脏排入膀胱的管道变窄。这种技术只需要一个小切口。我们的结果表明,手术是安全的,病人恢复很快,很快就能恢复日常活动。需要更多患者参与的更大规模研究来证实这些结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Single-port Robot-assisted Ureteral Reimplantation via Low Anterior Access: Step-by-step Procedure and Preliminary Comparative Results

Background and objective

Multiport robotic management of distal ureteral strictures is still burdened by the mandatory transperitoneal approach and the steep Trendelenburg patient position. Our aim was to describe the largest series of patients treated with single-port robot-assisted ureteral reimplantation (SP-RAUR) via a supine extraperitoneal approach, with a focus on the surgical technique, perioperative surgical outcomes, and functional results.

Methods and surgical procedure

Clinical and surgical data for all consecutive adult patients treated with SP-RAUR between January 2021 and September 2023 were prospectively collected. Patients were stratified by surgical approach into low anterior access (LAA) and transperitoneal (TP) groups. Ureteral reimplantation was performed extraperitoneally with patients in a supine position.

Key findings and limitations

Overall, 20 patients who underwent SP-RAUR and had minimum follow-up of 1 yr were included in the analysis, of whom 50% were treated via an LAA approach. There were no significant differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. No open conversions or intraoperative complications occurred. The operative time was shorter in the LAA group than in the TP group (165 vs 191 min; p = 0.01). In terms of perioperative features, the LAA approach was associated with lower postoperative pain and opioid use and shorter length of stay (8 vs 26.5 h; p = 0.016). No major postoperative complications or recurrent urinary obstruction were observed after median follow-up of 14.5 mo.

Conclusions and clinical implications

SP-RAUR via LAA represents a feasible and safe procedure with potential to improve perioperative recovery for patients with a distal ureter stricture.

Patient summary

We assessed a new robot-assisted surgery technique to treat narrowing of the tube that drains urine from the kidney into the bladder. This technique uses just a single small incision. Our results show that the procedure is safe and that patients have a quick recovery and a fast return to everyday activities. Larger studies with more patients are needed to confirm these results.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信