来自转移性乳头状肾细胞癌一线治疗的多中心回顾性分析的真实证据。守护者项目

IF 4.5 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Thomas Hilser , Jozefina Casuscelli , Can Aydogdu , Stefanie Zschäbitz , Marco Julius Schnabel , Emily Rinderknecht , Angelika Mattigk , Martin Schostak , Anna-Lisa Volk , Philipp Ivanyi , Jonas Wiegmann , Christopher Darr , Luka Flegar , Subhajit Mandal , Katrin Schlack , Daniel Seidl , Analena Handke , Melanie Klee , Tim Nestler , Marc Rehlinghaus , Pia Paffenholz
{"title":"来自转移性乳头状肾细胞癌一线治疗的多中心回顾性分析的真实证据。守护者项目","authors":"Thomas Hilser ,&nbsp;Jozefina Casuscelli ,&nbsp;Can Aydogdu ,&nbsp;Stefanie Zschäbitz ,&nbsp;Marco Julius Schnabel ,&nbsp;Emily Rinderknecht ,&nbsp;Angelika Mattigk ,&nbsp;Martin Schostak ,&nbsp;Anna-Lisa Volk ,&nbsp;Philipp Ivanyi ,&nbsp;Jonas Wiegmann ,&nbsp;Christopher Darr ,&nbsp;Luka Flegar ,&nbsp;Subhajit Mandal ,&nbsp;Katrin Schlack ,&nbsp;Daniel Seidl ,&nbsp;Analena Handke ,&nbsp;Melanie Klee ,&nbsp;Tim Nestler ,&nbsp;Marc Rehlinghaus ,&nbsp;Pia Paffenholz","doi":"10.1016/j.euros.2025.06.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is a rare disease. The optimal treatment of metastatic pRCC is still unclear. We evaluated real-world treatment outcomes of first-line treatment in this cohort in Germany.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with advanced or metastatic pRCC were eligible. Adverse events (AEs) were reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The overall response rate was accessed according to the local standard. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the start of treatment to progression or death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier plots were utilised, where appropriate.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>In total, 121 suitable patients (77% male) with a median age of 63 yr (quartiles 55, 70) were included. Prior nephrectomy was performed in 78%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1 was reported in 74%. Lymphatic (68%) and pulmonary (42%) metastases were most common. Of the patients, 59% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies (ICI-ICI: 20%, tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]-ICI: 39%), and 41% of patients received TKI monotherapy, predominantly sunitinib. The median follow-up time was 33.3 mo (interquartile range 14.8–46.7). The median PFS was 5.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2–7.6) for ICI-ICI combinations, 16.9 mo (95% CI: 7.2–26.6) for ICI-TKI combinations, and 8.8 mo (95% CI: 7.0–10.7) for TKI monotherapy. Of all the patients, 70% and 35% experienced all-grade and grade 3–5 AEs, respectively. AEs of any cause led to discontinuation in 33% of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>TKI-based therapies are applied frequently in pRCC patients. Our data support the use of ICI plus TKI as a first-line standard for patients with pRCC. The major limitations were the retrospective data capture and short follow-up of our study. Additional analyses to tailor treatment strategies in patients with metastatic pRCC are warranted.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this report, we looked at the outcome of first-line treatment of patients with metastatic papillary renal cell cancer (pRCC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies are applied frequently in pRCC. Our data support the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus TKI as a first-line standard for patients with pRCC. However, further studies are needed to optimise treatment in patients with metastatic pRCC.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":12254,"journal":{"name":"European Urology Open Science","volume":"78 ","pages":"Pages 59-67"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Real-world Evidence from a Retrospective Multicentre Analysis on First-line Therapy for Metastatic Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. A GUARDIANS Project\",\"authors\":\"Thomas Hilser ,&nbsp;Jozefina Casuscelli ,&nbsp;Can Aydogdu ,&nbsp;Stefanie Zschäbitz ,&nbsp;Marco Julius Schnabel ,&nbsp;Emily Rinderknecht ,&nbsp;Angelika Mattigk ,&nbsp;Martin Schostak ,&nbsp;Anna-Lisa Volk ,&nbsp;Philipp Ivanyi ,&nbsp;Jonas Wiegmann ,&nbsp;Christopher Darr ,&nbsp;Luka Flegar ,&nbsp;Subhajit Mandal ,&nbsp;Katrin Schlack ,&nbsp;Daniel Seidl ,&nbsp;Analena Handke ,&nbsp;Melanie Klee ,&nbsp;Tim Nestler ,&nbsp;Marc Rehlinghaus ,&nbsp;Pia Paffenholz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.euros.2025.06.011\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background and objective</h3><div>Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is a rare disease. The optimal treatment of metastatic pRCC is still unclear. We evaluated real-world treatment outcomes of first-line treatment in this cohort in Germany.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients with advanced or metastatic pRCC were eligible. Adverse events (AEs) were reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The overall response rate was accessed according to the local standard. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the start of treatment to progression or death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier plots were utilised, where appropriate.</div></div><div><h3>Key findings and limitations</h3><div>In total, 121 suitable patients (77% male) with a median age of 63 yr (quartiles 55, 70) were included. Prior nephrectomy was performed in 78%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1 was reported in 74%. Lymphatic (68%) and pulmonary (42%) metastases were most common. Of the patients, 59% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies (ICI-ICI: 20%, tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]-ICI: 39%), and 41% of patients received TKI monotherapy, predominantly sunitinib. The median follow-up time was 33.3 mo (interquartile range 14.8–46.7). The median PFS was 5.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2–7.6) for ICI-ICI combinations, 16.9 mo (95% CI: 7.2–26.6) for ICI-TKI combinations, and 8.8 mo (95% CI: 7.0–10.7) for TKI monotherapy. Of all the patients, 70% and 35% experienced all-grade and grade 3–5 AEs, respectively. AEs of any cause led to discontinuation in 33% of patients.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions and clinical implications</h3><div>TKI-based therapies are applied frequently in pRCC patients. Our data support the use of ICI plus TKI as a first-line standard for patients with pRCC. The major limitations were the retrospective data capture and short follow-up of our study. Additional analyses to tailor treatment strategies in patients with metastatic pRCC are warranted.</div></div><div><h3>Patient summary</h3><div>In this report, we looked at the outcome of first-line treatment of patients with metastatic papillary renal cell cancer (pRCC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies are applied frequently in pRCC. Our data support the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus TKI as a first-line standard for patients with pRCC. However, further studies are needed to optimise treatment in patients with metastatic pRCC.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Urology Open Science\",\"volume\":\"78 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 59-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Urology Open Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325002447\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Urology Open Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666168325002447","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景与目的乳头状肾细胞癌(pRCC)是一种罕见的疾病。转移性pRCC的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。我们在德国的这个队列中评估了一线治疗的真实治疗结果。方法晚期或转移性pRCC患者入选。不良事件(ae)按照不良事件通用术语标准5.0版本报告。总体响应率根据当地标准进行访问。无进展生存期(PFS)从治疗开始到进展或死亡计算。适当时使用描述性统计和Kaplan-Meier图。主要发现和局限性总共纳入了121例适合的患者(77%为男性),中位年龄为63岁(四分位数55,70)。78%的患者曾行过肾切除术。东部肿瘤合作组业绩状态0-1的占74%。淋巴转移(68%)和肺转移(42%)最为常见。在患者中,59%的患者接受一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI-ICI: 20%,酪氨酸激酶抑制剂[TKI]-ICI: 39%)联合治疗,41%的患者接受TKI单药治疗,主要是舒尼替尼。中位随访时间为33.3个月(四分位数间距14.8-46.7)。ICI-ICI联合的中位PFS为5.4个月(95%可信区间[CI]: 3.2-7.6), ICI-TKI联合的中位PFS为16.9个月(95% CI: 7.2-26.6), TKI单药治疗的中位PFS为8.8个月(95% CI: 7.0-10.7)。在所有患者中,70%和35%分别经历了全级和3-5级ae。任何原因的不良反应导致33%的患者停药。结论和临床意义基于stki的治疗在pRCC患者中应用频繁。我们的数据支持使用ICI + TKI作为pRCC患者的一线标准。本研究的主要局限性是回顾性数据采集和随访时间短。有必要对转移性pRCC患者的治疗策略进行额外的分析。在本报告中,我们观察了转移性乳头状肾细胞癌(pRCC)患者的一线治疗结果。酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)是pRCC常用的治疗方法。我们的数据支持使用免疫检查点抑制剂加TKI作为pRCC患者的一线标准。然而,需要进一步的研究来优化转移性pRCC患者的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Real-world Evidence from a Retrospective Multicentre Analysis on First-line Therapy for Metastatic Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma. A GUARDIANS Project

Background and objective

Papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC) is a rare disease. The optimal treatment of metastatic pRCC is still unclear. We evaluated real-world treatment outcomes of first-line treatment in this cohort in Germany.

Methods

Patients with advanced or metastatic pRCC were eligible. Adverse events (AEs) were reported according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0. The overall response rate was accessed according to the local standard. Progression-free survival (PFS) was calculated from the start of treatment to progression or death. Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier plots were utilised, where appropriate.

Key findings and limitations

In total, 121 suitable patients (77% male) with a median age of 63 yr (quartiles 55, 70) were included. Prior nephrectomy was performed in 78%. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1 was reported in 74%. Lymphatic (68%) and pulmonary (42%) metastases were most common. Of the patients, 59% received first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapies (ICI-ICI: 20%, tyrosine kinase inhibitor [TKI]-ICI: 39%), and 41% of patients received TKI monotherapy, predominantly sunitinib. The median follow-up time was 33.3 mo (interquartile range 14.8–46.7). The median PFS was 5.4 mo (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.2–7.6) for ICI-ICI combinations, 16.9 mo (95% CI: 7.2–26.6) for ICI-TKI combinations, and 8.8 mo (95% CI: 7.0–10.7) for TKI monotherapy. Of all the patients, 70% and 35% experienced all-grade and grade 3–5 AEs, respectively. AEs of any cause led to discontinuation in 33% of patients.

Conclusions and clinical implications

TKI-based therapies are applied frequently in pRCC patients. Our data support the use of ICI plus TKI as a first-line standard for patients with pRCC. The major limitations were the retrospective data capture and short follow-up of our study. Additional analyses to tailor treatment strategies in patients with metastatic pRCC are warranted.

Patient summary

In this report, we looked at the outcome of first-line treatment of patients with metastatic papillary renal cell cancer (pRCC). Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-based therapies are applied frequently in pRCC. Our data support the use of immune checkpoint inhibitor plus TKI as a first-line standard for patients with pRCC. However, further studies are needed to optimise treatment in patients with metastatic pRCC.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Urology Open Science
European Urology Open Science UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
1183
审稿时长
49 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信