对卫生政策制定者实施公众信任——欧盟、法国、意大利和瑞士的一项定性研究

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Federica Zavattaro , Viktor von Wyl , Felix Gille
{"title":"对卫生政策制定者实施公众信任——欧盟、法国、意大利和瑞士的一项定性研究","authors":"Federica Zavattaro ,&nbsp;Viktor von Wyl ,&nbsp;Felix Gille","doi":"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105393","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Public trust is crucial for the success of health data-sharing initiatives (HDSIs), as it influences public participation. Although the potential for policies to actively foster trust is widely acknowledged, recent policy analyses suggest that this opportunity is often overlooked in practice.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate if and how health policymakers at the European Union level and in France, Italy, and Switzerland prioritise and integrate public trust into their policy work, identifying key gaps and providing preliminary guidance to bridge them.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted 57 semi-structured online interviews with policymakers involved in HDSIs at different stages of the policy process: 20 at the European level, 11 in France, 13 in Italy, and 13 in Switzerland. An inductive thematic approach was employed to identify emerging themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Policymakers recognise public trust as crucial for public participation in HDSIs, yet no shared definition of trust in health data-sharing emerged. In France, trust-building is treated as a policy priority and embedded in stakeholder and public engagement processes prior to legislation. At the European, Italian, and Swiss levels, trust remains a vague concept, addressed implicitly without clear strategies. Policymakers highlighted the absence of specific guidance on trust-building and called for its development.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We identified a lack of harmonisation among policymakers regarding the definition of public trust and its translation into policy. In response, we propose a working definition of public trust in health data-sharing and highlight the urgent need for concrete, actionable tools to support policymakers in integrating trust-building principles into health data-sharing policies.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55067,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy","volume":"161 ","pages":"Article 105393"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Operationalising public trust for health policymakers - A qualitative study in the EU, France, Italy, and Switzerland\",\"authors\":\"Federica Zavattaro ,&nbsp;Viktor von Wyl ,&nbsp;Felix Gille\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.healthpol.2025.105393\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Public trust is crucial for the success of health data-sharing initiatives (HDSIs), as it influences public participation. Although the potential for policies to actively foster trust is widely acknowledged, recent policy analyses suggest that this opportunity is often overlooked in practice.</div></div><div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To investigate if and how health policymakers at the European Union level and in France, Italy, and Switzerland prioritise and integrate public trust into their policy work, identifying key gaps and providing preliminary guidance to bridge them.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted 57 semi-structured online interviews with policymakers involved in HDSIs at different stages of the policy process: 20 at the European level, 11 in France, 13 in Italy, and 13 in Switzerland. An inductive thematic approach was employed to identify emerging themes.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Policymakers recognise public trust as crucial for public participation in HDSIs, yet no shared definition of trust in health data-sharing emerged. In France, trust-building is treated as a policy priority and embedded in stakeholder and public engagement processes prior to legislation. At the European, Italian, and Swiss levels, trust remains a vague concept, addressed implicitly without clear strategies. Policymakers highlighted the absence of specific guidance on trust-building and called for its development.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We identified a lack of harmonisation among policymakers regarding the definition of public trust and its translation into policy. In response, we propose a working definition of public trust in health data-sharing and highlight the urgent need for concrete, actionable tools to support policymakers in integrating trust-building principles into health data-sharing policies.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55067,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Policy\",\"volume\":\"161 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105393\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001484\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168851025001484","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

公众信任对卫生数据共享举措(hdsi)的成功至关重要,因为它影响公众参与。虽然政策积极促进信任的潜力得到广泛承认,但最近的政策分析表明,这一机会在实践中往往被忽视。目的调查欧盟以及法国、意大利和瑞士的卫生政策制定者是否以及如何将公众信任纳入其政策工作的优先级,确定关键差距并提供初步指导以弥合这些差距。方法我们进行了57次半结构化的在线访谈,访谈对象是在政策制定过程的不同阶段参与hdsi的政策制定者:20位在欧洲,11位在法国,13位在意大利,13位在瑞士。采用归纳主题方法确定新出现的主题。结果决策者认识到公众信任对公众参与hdsi至关重要,但没有对卫生数据共享中的信任的共同定义。在法国,信任建设被视为一项优先政策,并在立法之前嵌入利益相关者和公众参与过程。在欧洲、意大利和瑞士,信任仍然是一个模糊的概念,没有明确的策略。政策制定者强调缺乏关于建立信任的具体指导,并呼吁发展这种指导。结论:我们发现决策者在公共信任的定义及其转化为政策方面缺乏协调。为此,我们提出了卫生数据共享中公众信任的工作定义,并强调迫切需要具体的、可操作的工具,以支持政策制定者将信任建设原则纳入卫生数据共享政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Operationalising public trust for health policymakers - A qualitative study in the EU, France, Italy, and Switzerland

Background

Public trust is crucial for the success of health data-sharing initiatives (HDSIs), as it influences public participation. Although the potential for policies to actively foster trust is widely acknowledged, recent policy analyses suggest that this opportunity is often overlooked in practice.

Objective

To investigate if and how health policymakers at the European Union level and in France, Italy, and Switzerland prioritise and integrate public trust into their policy work, identifying key gaps and providing preliminary guidance to bridge them.

Methods

We conducted 57 semi-structured online interviews with policymakers involved in HDSIs at different stages of the policy process: 20 at the European level, 11 in France, 13 in Italy, and 13 in Switzerland. An inductive thematic approach was employed to identify emerging themes.

Results

Policymakers recognise public trust as crucial for public participation in HDSIs, yet no shared definition of trust in health data-sharing emerged. In France, trust-building is treated as a policy priority and embedded in stakeholder and public engagement processes prior to legislation. At the European, Italian, and Swiss levels, trust remains a vague concept, addressed implicitly without clear strategies. Policymakers highlighted the absence of specific guidance on trust-building and called for its development.

Conclusions

We identified a lack of harmonisation among policymakers regarding the definition of public trust and its translation into policy. In response, we propose a working definition of public trust in health data-sharing and highlight the urgent need for concrete, actionable tools to support policymakers in integrating trust-building principles into health data-sharing policies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Policy
Health Policy 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
6.10%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Health Policy is intended to be a vehicle for the exploration and discussion of health policy and health system issues and is aimed in particular at enhancing communication between health policy and system researchers, legislators, decision-makers and professionals concerned with developing, implementing, and analysing health policy, health systems and health care reforms, primarily in high-income countries outside the U.S.A.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信