Haley Genovese,Carlos Alonso Mayo,Erkan Kalafat,Human Fatemi,Baris Ata,Juan Garcia-Velasco,Emre Seli
{"title":"子宫内膜厚度是否会影响冷冻胚胎移植后的活产率:30676例整倍体单胚胎移植的结果","authors":"Haley Genovese,Carlos Alonso Mayo,Erkan Kalafat,Human Fatemi,Baris Ata,Juan Garcia-Velasco,Emre Seli","doi":"10.1093/humrep/deaf129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"STUDY QUESTION\r\nDoes endometrial thickness (ET) impact live birth rate (LBR) in patients undergoing single euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET)?\r\n\r\nSUMMARY ANSWER\r\nPatients with the thinnest endometrial lining exhibit a decline in LBR at all centers, but the magnitude of the decline and the ET threshold at which it is identified is variable by center and cycle type.\r\n\r\nWHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY\r\nThin endometrium is thought to be an impediment to FET cycle success, and it is widely believed that pregnancy and LBRs are improved when the ET is >6-8 mm. However, evidence for this is limited and some studies report contradictory findings which indicate that ET does not significantly impact LBR.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION\r\nThis is an international multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted between January 2017 and December 2022 at 25 different IVF centers in 3 countries and including a total of 30 676 cycles.\r\n\r\nPARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS\r\nAll FET cycles involved a single euploid blastocyst created with autologous oocytes. Endometrial preparation protocols were selected at the discretion of the physicians and the patients, and included programmed cycles, natural, and modified natural cycles (NC and mNC). The primary outcome was the LBR stratified by ET and cycle type. The distribution of ET measurements was assessed with histograms and quantile-quantile plots. Conditional density plots (CDPs) were utilized to determine the associations between ET measurement and LBR. Adjusted effect estimates of ET on LBR were assessed with multivariable logistic regression analyses, and receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were used to assess the performance of ET for predicting live birth.\r\n\r\nMAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE\r\nThere were 24 097 (78.6%) programmed cycles, 759 (2.5%) NCs, and 5820 (19.0%) mNCs included in the analyses. The median ET among all cycle types at all centers was 8.9 mm (9.0 mm in the USA, 8.7 mm in Spain, 8.0 mm in the UAE). When cycles from all centers were grouped together, CDPs showed a decline in LBR for ET <7 mm in both programmed and mNCs. Regression analyses demonstrated that in cycles with a lining <7 mm undergoing programmed cycles and mNC, odds of LBR were reduced by 22% [aOR 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.87), P ≤ 0.001] and 41% [aOR 0.59 (95% CI 0.49-0.72), P < 0.001], respectively. In patients undergoing NC, there was no ET threshold at which LBR was impacted and regression analysis demonstrated that LBR is not significantly impacted by ET <7 mm in patients undergoing NC [aOR 0.85 (95% CI 0.58-1.25), P = 0.41]. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the overall analysis, Q-Q plots demonstrated that the distribution of ET measurements varied between the centers and the percentage of programmed cycles with ET <7 mm was lowest in the USA (2.6%) and Spain (5.2%), compared with the UAE (12%). Two models were developed to determine the prognostic value of ET for predicting live birth. The performance of the model with endometrial thickness (AUC: 0.597, interquartile range (IQR): 0.593-0.601) was not significantly higher (P = 0.052) than the model without it (AUC: 0.591, IQR: 0.586-0.595), suggesting that ET is not a strong predictor of LBR.\r\n\r\nLIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION\r\nThe retrospective nature of the study design restricts the ability to establish causal relationships and fully control for variables not included in the analysis.\r\n\r\nWIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS\r\nThis is a large multicenter study including single euploid FET cycles in order to effectively evaluate the impact of ET on LBR. These results provide new insight into the nuances of the relationship between ET and LBR at various international centers and within the context of three major FET protocols.\r\n\r\nSTUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)\r\nNo funding was required for this study. Research support was provided by IVIRMA Global Research Alliance. The authors have the following conflicts of interest: H.G.-none. C.A.M.-none. E.K.-none. H.F.-Grants/contracts and payment for lectures/educational events from: Merck, Organon, Besins, Gedeon Richter, IBSA, Ferring. B.A.-none. J.G.-V.-none. E.S.-none.\r\n\r\nTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER\r\nN/A.","PeriodicalId":13003,"journal":{"name":"Human reproduction","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does endometrial thickness impact live birth rate following a frozen embryo transfer: outcomes of 30 676 euploid single embryo transfers.\",\"authors\":\"Haley Genovese,Carlos Alonso Mayo,Erkan Kalafat,Human Fatemi,Baris Ata,Juan Garcia-Velasco,Emre Seli\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/humrep/deaf129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"STUDY QUESTION\\r\\nDoes endometrial thickness (ET) impact live birth rate (LBR) in patients undergoing single euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET)?\\r\\n\\r\\nSUMMARY ANSWER\\r\\nPatients with the thinnest endometrial lining exhibit a decline in LBR at all centers, but the magnitude of the decline and the ET threshold at which it is identified is variable by center and cycle type.\\r\\n\\r\\nWHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY\\r\\nThin endometrium is thought to be an impediment to FET cycle success, and it is widely believed that pregnancy and LBRs are improved when the ET is >6-8 mm. However, evidence for this is limited and some studies report contradictory findings which indicate that ET does not significantly impact LBR.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION\\r\\nThis is an international multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted between January 2017 and December 2022 at 25 different IVF centers in 3 countries and including a total of 30 676 cycles.\\r\\n\\r\\nPARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS\\r\\nAll FET cycles involved a single euploid blastocyst created with autologous oocytes. Endometrial preparation protocols were selected at the discretion of the physicians and the patients, and included programmed cycles, natural, and modified natural cycles (NC and mNC). The primary outcome was the LBR stratified by ET and cycle type. The distribution of ET measurements was assessed with histograms and quantile-quantile plots. Conditional density plots (CDPs) were utilized to determine the associations between ET measurement and LBR. Adjusted effect estimates of ET on LBR were assessed with multivariable logistic regression analyses, and receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were used to assess the performance of ET for predicting live birth.\\r\\n\\r\\nMAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE\\r\\nThere were 24 097 (78.6%) programmed cycles, 759 (2.5%) NCs, and 5820 (19.0%) mNCs included in the analyses. The median ET among all cycle types at all centers was 8.9 mm (9.0 mm in the USA, 8.7 mm in Spain, 8.0 mm in the UAE). When cycles from all centers were grouped together, CDPs showed a decline in LBR for ET <7 mm in both programmed and mNCs. Regression analyses demonstrated that in cycles with a lining <7 mm undergoing programmed cycles and mNC, odds of LBR were reduced by 22% [aOR 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.87), P ≤ 0.001] and 41% [aOR 0.59 (95% CI 0.49-0.72), P < 0.001], respectively. In patients undergoing NC, there was no ET threshold at which LBR was impacted and regression analysis demonstrated that LBR is not significantly impacted by ET <7 mm in patients undergoing NC [aOR 0.85 (95% CI 0.58-1.25), P = 0.41]. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the overall analysis, Q-Q plots demonstrated that the distribution of ET measurements varied between the centers and the percentage of programmed cycles with ET <7 mm was lowest in the USA (2.6%) and Spain (5.2%), compared with the UAE (12%). Two models were developed to determine the prognostic value of ET for predicting live birth. The performance of the model with endometrial thickness (AUC: 0.597, interquartile range (IQR): 0.593-0.601) was not significantly higher (P = 0.052) than the model without it (AUC: 0.591, IQR: 0.586-0.595), suggesting that ET is not a strong predictor of LBR.\\r\\n\\r\\nLIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION\\r\\nThe retrospective nature of the study design restricts the ability to establish causal relationships and fully control for variables not included in the analysis.\\r\\n\\r\\nWIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS\\r\\nThis is a large multicenter study including single euploid FET cycles in order to effectively evaluate the impact of ET on LBR. These results provide new insight into the nuances of the relationship between ET and LBR at various international centers and within the context of three major FET protocols.\\r\\n\\r\\nSTUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)\\r\\nNo funding was required for this study. Research support was provided by IVIRMA Global Research Alliance. The authors have the following conflicts of interest: H.G.-none. C.A.M.-none. E.K.-none. H.F.-Grants/contracts and payment for lectures/educational events from: Merck, Organon, Besins, Gedeon Richter, IBSA, Ferring. B.A.-none. J.G.-V.-none. E.S.-none.\\r\\n\\r\\nTRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER\\r\\nN/A.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13003,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Human reproduction\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Human reproduction\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf129\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deaf129","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
研究问题:子宫内膜厚度(ET)是否会影响接受单整倍体冷冻胚胎移植(FET)患者的活产率(LBR) ?子宫内膜最薄的患者在所有中心均表现出LBR下降,但下降的幅度和确定的ET阈值因中心和周期类型而异。已知情况:薄的子宫内膜被认为是FET周期成功的一个障碍,人们普遍认为,当ET为6-8毫米时,妊娠和lbr得到改善。然而,这方面的证据有限,一些研究报告的结果相互矛盾,表明ET对LBR没有显著影响。研究设计、规模、持续时间这是一项国际多中心回顾性队列研究,于2017年1月至2022年12月在3个国家的25个不同的IVF中心进行,共包括30676个周期。参与者/材料、环境、方法所有FET周期均涉及单个由自体卵母细胞形成的整倍体囊胚。子宫内膜准备方案由医生和患者自行选择,包括程序周期、自然周期和修改的自然周期(NC和mNC)。主要终点是按ET和周期类型分层的LBR。用直方图和分位数-分位数图评估ET测量的分布。条件密度图(CDPs)用于确定ET测量与LBR之间的关系。采用多变量logistic回归分析评估ET对LBR的调整效应,并采用受试者工作特征曲线(ROC)评估ET预测活产的效果。主要结果和机会的作用分析包括24097个(78.6%)程序周期,759个(2.5%)nc和5820个(19.0%)mNCs。所有中心所有周期类型的中位ET为8.9 mm(美国为9.0 mm,西班牙为8.7 mm,阿联酋为8.0 mm)。当来自所有中心的周期组合在一起时,CDPs显示ET <7 mm的LBR在编程和跨国公司中都有所下降。回归分析表明,在衬里<7 mm的周期中,进行程序化周期和mNC, LBR的几率分别降低了22% [aOR 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.87), P≤0.001]和41% [aOR 0.59 (95% CI 0.49-0.72), P < 0.001]。在接受NC手术的患者中,没有影响LBR的ET阈值,回归分析表明,接受NC手术的患者中,ET <7 mm对LBR没有显著影响[aOR 0.85 (95% CI 0.58-1.25), P = 0.41]。敏感性分析与总体分析一致,Q-Q图显示,各中心之间的ET测量分布不同,美国(2.6%)和西班牙(5.2%)的ET <7 mm的程序化周期百分比最低,而阿联酋(12%)。开发了两个模型来确定ET对预测活产的预后价值。有子宫内膜厚度的模型(AUC: 0.597,四分位间距(IQR): 0.593-0.601)的性能不显著高于无子宫内膜厚度的模型(AUC: 0.591, IQR: 0.586-0.595) (P = 0.052),提示ET不是LBR的强预测因子。研究设计的回顾性限制了建立因果关系和完全控制分析中未包括的变量的能力。研究结果的广泛意义这是一项大型多中心研究,包括单个整倍体FET周期,以有效评估ET对LBR的影响。这些结果为在不同的国际中心以及在三个主要场效应效应协议的背景下,ET和LBR之间关系的细微差别提供了新的见解。研究资金/竞争利益(S)本研究不需要资金。研究支持由IVIRMA全球研究联盟提供。作者有以下利益冲突:h.g. -无。C.A.M.-none。E.K.-none。h . f .-讲座/教育活动的补助金/合同和付款:默克、奥根农、贝辛斯、Gedeon Richter、IBSA、Ferring。B.A.-none。J.G.-V.-none。E.S.-none。试验注册号/ a。
Does endometrial thickness impact live birth rate following a frozen embryo transfer: outcomes of 30 676 euploid single embryo transfers.
STUDY QUESTION
Does endometrial thickness (ET) impact live birth rate (LBR) in patients undergoing single euploid frozen embryo transfer (FET)?
SUMMARY ANSWER
Patients with the thinnest endometrial lining exhibit a decline in LBR at all centers, but the magnitude of the decline and the ET threshold at which it is identified is variable by center and cycle type.
WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY
Thin endometrium is thought to be an impediment to FET cycle success, and it is widely believed that pregnancy and LBRs are improved when the ET is >6-8 mm. However, evidence for this is limited and some studies report contradictory findings which indicate that ET does not significantly impact LBR.
STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION
This is an international multicenter retrospective cohort study conducted between January 2017 and December 2022 at 25 different IVF centers in 3 countries and including a total of 30 676 cycles.
PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS
All FET cycles involved a single euploid blastocyst created with autologous oocytes. Endometrial preparation protocols were selected at the discretion of the physicians and the patients, and included programmed cycles, natural, and modified natural cycles (NC and mNC). The primary outcome was the LBR stratified by ET and cycle type. The distribution of ET measurements was assessed with histograms and quantile-quantile plots. Conditional density plots (CDPs) were utilized to determine the associations between ET measurement and LBR. Adjusted effect estimates of ET on LBR were assessed with multivariable logistic regression analyses, and receiver operating characteristics curves (ROC) were used to assess the performance of ET for predicting live birth.
MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE
There were 24 097 (78.6%) programmed cycles, 759 (2.5%) NCs, and 5820 (19.0%) mNCs included in the analyses. The median ET among all cycle types at all centers was 8.9 mm (9.0 mm in the USA, 8.7 mm in Spain, 8.0 mm in the UAE). When cycles from all centers were grouped together, CDPs showed a decline in LBR for ET <7 mm in both programmed and mNCs. Regression analyses demonstrated that in cycles with a lining <7 mm undergoing programmed cycles and mNC, odds of LBR were reduced by 22% [aOR 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.87), P ≤ 0.001] and 41% [aOR 0.59 (95% CI 0.49-0.72), P < 0.001], respectively. In patients undergoing NC, there was no ET threshold at which LBR was impacted and regression analysis demonstrated that LBR is not significantly impacted by ET <7 mm in patients undergoing NC [aOR 0.85 (95% CI 0.58-1.25), P = 0.41]. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the overall analysis, Q-Q plots demonstrated that the distribution of ET measurements varied between the centers and the percentage of programmed cycles with ET <7 mm was lowest in the USA (2.6%) and Spain (5.2%), compared with the UAE (12%). Two models were developed to determine the prognostic value of ET for predicting live birth. The performance of the model with endometrial thickness (AUC: 0.597, interquartile range (IQR): 0.593-0.601) was not significantly higher (P = 0.052) than the model without it (AUC: 0.591, IQR: 0.586-0.595), suggesting that ET is not a strong predictor of LBR.
LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION
The retrospective nature of the study design restricts the ability to establish causal relationships and fully control for variables not included in the analysis.
WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS
This is a large multicenter study including single euploid FET cycles in order to effectively evaluate the impact of ET on LBR. These results provide new insight into the nuances of the relationship between ET and LBR at various international centers and within the context of three major FET protocols.
STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)
No funding was required for this study. Research support was provided by IVIRMA Global Research Alliance. The authors have the following conflicts of interest: H.G.-none. C.A.M.-none. E.K.-none. H.F.-Grants/contracts and payment for lectures/educational events from: Merck, Organon, Besins, Gedeon Richter, IBSA, Ferring. B.A.-none. J.G.-V.-none. E.S.-none.
TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER
N/A.
期刊介绍:
Human Reproduction features full-length, peer-reviewed papers reporting original research, concise clinical case reports, as well as opinions and debates on topical issues.
Papers published cover the clinical science and medical aspects of reproductive physiology, pathology and endocrinology; including andrology, gonad function, gametogenesis, fertilization, embryo development, implantation, early pregnancy, genetics, genetic diagnosis, oncology, infectious disease, surgery, contraception, infertility treatment, psychology, ethics and social issues.