在团队合作、目标、技术和严格控制(4T)研究中,青年HbA1c持续改善36个月。

IF 5.1
Priya Prahalad, Victoria Y Ding, Dessi P Zaharieva, Ananta Addala, Ramesh Johari, David Scheinker, Korey K Hood, Manisha Desai, David M Maahs
{"title":"在团队合作、目标、技术和严格控制(4T)研究中,青年HbA1c持续改善36个月。","authors":"Priya Prahalad, Victoria Y Ding, Dessi P Zaharieva, Ananta Addala, Ramesh Johari, David Scheinker, Korey K Hood, Manisha Desai, David M Maahs","doi":"10.1210/clinem/dgaf397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) struggle to meet and sustain hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) targets. Youth enrolled in the Pilot 4T Study improved HbA1c by 0.5%, compared to historical controls at 1-year.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess 3 years of glycemic outcomes in the Pilot 4T Study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The Pilot 4T Extension cohort was prospectively followed to determine changes in HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics over 3 years.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Stanford Medicine Children's Health Diabetes Clinic.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Youth with T1D in the Pilot 4T Study enrolled in the extension phase.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Youth started CGM in the first month of diabetes diagnosis, received intensified education and remote patient monitoring (RPM) weekly for the first year of diabetes diagnosis and monthly RPM in the extension phase.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>HbA1c and CGM metrics over the first 3 years of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Pilot 4T cohort, 78.5% (n=102) of participants enrolled in the study extension phase and were followed through 3 years. The adjusted difference in HbA1c at 3 years was 1.2% (95% CI 0.7-1.7%) lower in the Pilot 4T cohort than in the Historical cohort. In the Pilot 4T cohort, 68% and 37% met the <7.5% and <7% HbA1c targets at 3 years, respectively, compared to 37% and 20% in the Historical cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Youth with T1D in the Pilot 4T extension phase sustained improvements in HbA1c over 3 years. Focusing resources on intensive management during the first year after T1D diagnosis may impact long-term glycemia.</p>","PeriodicalId":520805,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sustained HbA1c Improvements Over 36 Months in Youth in the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T) Study.\",\"authors\":\"Priya Prahalad, Victoria Y Ding, Dessi P Zaharieva, Ananta Addala, Ramesh Johari, David Scheinker, Korey K Hood, Manisha Desai, David M Maahs\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/clinem/dgaf397\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) struggle to meet and sustain hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) targets. Youth enrolled in the Pilot 4T Study improved HbA1c by 0.5%, compared to historical controls at 1-year.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess 3 years of glycemic outcomes in the Pilot 4T Study.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The Pilot 4T Extension cohort was prospectively followed to determine changes in HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics over 3 years.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Stanford Medicine Children's Health Diabetes Clinic.</p><p><strong>Patients or other participants: </strong>Youth with T1D in the Pilot 4T Study enrolled in the extension phase.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Youth started CGM in the first month of diabetes diagnosis, received intensified education and remote patient monitoring (RPM) weekly for the first year of diabetes diagnosis and monthly RPM in the extension phase.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>HbA1c and CGM metrics over the first 3 years of diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the Pilot 4T cohort, 78.5% (n=102) of participants enrolled in the study extension phase and were followed through 3 years. The adjusted difference in HbA1c at 3 years was 1.2% (95% CI 0.7-1.7%) lower in the Pilot 4T cohort than in the Historical cohort. In the Pilot 4T cohort, 68% and 37% met the <7.5% and <7% HbA1c targets at 3 years, respectively, compared to 37% and 20% in the Historical cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Youth with T1D in the Pilot 4T extension phase sustained improvements in HbA1c over 3 years. Focusing resources on intensive management during the first year after T1D diagnosis may impact long-term glycemia.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520805,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf397\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/clinem/dgaf397","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:患有1型糖尿病(T1D)的青年很难达到并维持血红蛋白A1c (HbA1c)目标。与历史对照相比,参加试点4T研究的青年在1年后的HbA1c改善了0.5%。目的:评估试点4T研究的3年血糖结局。设计:对Pilot 4T扩展队列进行前瞻性随访,以确定3年内HbA1c和连续血糖监测(CGM)指标的变化。地点:斯坦福医学院儿童健康糖尿病诊所。患者或其他参与者:在试点4T研究中纳入扩展阶段的青年T1D患者。干预:青少年在糖尿病诊断的第一个月开始CGM,在糖尿病诊断的第一年接受强化教育和每周一次的远程患者监测(RPM),在延长期接受每月的RPM。主要结局指标:诊断前3年的HbA1c和CGM指标。结果:在Pilot 4T队列中,78.5% (n=102)的参与者参加了研究扩展阶段,并随访了3年。Pilot 4T组3年调整后的HbA1c差异比Historical组低1.2% (95% CI 0.7-1.7%)。在试点4T队列中,68%和37%的T1D患者符合以下结论:在试点4T扩展阶段,青年T1D患者的HbA1c在3年内持续改善。将资源集中于T1D诊断后第一年的强化管理可能会影响长期血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sustained HbA1c Improvements Over 36 Months in Youth in the Teamwork, Targets, Technology, and Tight Control (4T) Study.

Context: Youth with type 1 diabetes (T1D) struggle to meet and sustain hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) targets. Youth enrolled in the Pilot 4T Study improved HbA1c by 0.5%, compared to historical controls at 1-year.

Objective: To assess 3 years of glycemic outcomes in the Pilot 4T Study.

Design: The Pilot 4T Extension cohort was prospectively followed to determine changes in HbA1c and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) metrics over 3 years.

Setting: Stanford Medicine Children's Health Diabetes Clinic.

Patients or other participants: Youth with T1D in the Pilot 4T Study enrolled in the extension phase.

Intervention: Youth started CGM in the first month of diabetes diagnosis, received intensified education and remote patient monitoring (RPM) weekly for the first year of diabetes diagnosis and monthly RPM in the extension phase.

Main outcome measure: HbA1c and CGM metrics over the first 3 years of diagnosis.

Results: In the Pilot 4T cohort, 78.5% (n=102) of participants enrolled in the study extension phase and were followed through 3 years. The adjusted difference in HbA1c at 3 years was 1.2% (95% CI 0.7-1.7%) lower in the Pilot 4T cohort than in the Historical cohort. In the Pilot 4T cohort, 68% and 37% met the <7.5% and <7% HbA1c targets at 3 years, respectively, compared to 37% and 20% in the Historical cohort.

Conclusions: Youth with T1D in the Pilot 4T extension phase sustained improvements in HbA1c over 3 years. Focusing resources on intensive management during the first year after T1D diagnosis may impact long-term glycemia.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信