机器学习在慢性淋巴细胞白血病早期预测和治疗中的应用的系统综述。

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Health Informatics Journal Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-09 DOI:10.1177/14604582251342178
Mohammad Al-Agil, Piers Em Patten, Anwar Alhaq
{"title":"机器学习在慢性淋巴细胞白血病早期预测和治疗中的应用的系统综述。","authors":"Mohammad Al-Agil, Piers Em Patten, Anwar Alhaq","doi":"10.1177/14604582251342178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This review assesses the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models for classification and management of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL).<b>Methods:</b> Twenty studies published between 2014 and 2023 were reviewed, focusing on supervised ML models to predict patient outcomes or guide treatment decisions. Studies were identified through PubMed, Google Scholar, and IEEExplore, with the final search in March 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies focused on ML applications in CLL. Exclusion criteria included studies lacking sufficient methodology or focused solely on experimental settings without clinical validation. Most studies used small, single-centre datasets, potentially contributing to overfitting and limited applicability to real-world settings.<b>Results:</b> Despite dataset limitations, all reviewed studies reported positive outcomes, with some demonstrating improvements in clinical workflows. Our findings advocate developing ML models using larger, multimodal, and multi-institutional datasets. Improved model interpretability and NLP implementation to harness unstructured clinical data were identified as key areas for advancement. Additionally, innovations like cross-site federated learning and automated redaction could help address data integration and privacy challenges.<b>Conclusion:</b> This review underscores the transformative potential of ML in CLL management. However, addressing limitations, including diverse datasets and enhanced model interpretability, is crucial for fully leveraging ML capabilities in haemato-oncology.</p>","PeriodicalId":55069,"journal":{"name":"Health Informatics Journal","volume":"31 3","pages":"14604582251342178"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic review of machine learning applications in the early prediction and management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.\",\"authors\":\"Mohammad Al-Agil, Piers Em Patten, Anwar Alhaq\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/14604582251342178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> This review assesses the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models for classification and management of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL).<b>Methods:</b> Twenty studies published between 2014 and 2023 were reviewed, focusing on supervised ML models to predict patient outcomes or guide treatment decisions. Studies were identified through PubMed, Google Scholar, and IEEExplore, with the final search in March 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies focused on ML applications in CLL. Exclusion criteria included studies lacking sufficient methodology or focused solely on experimental settings without clinical validation. Most studies used small, single-centre datasets, potentially contributing to overfitting and limited applicability to real-world settings.<b>Results:</b> Despite dataset limitations, all reviewed studies reported positive outcomes, with some demonstrating improvements in clinical workflows. Our findings advocate developing ML models using larger, multimodal, and multi-institutional datasets. Improved model interpretability and NLP implementation to harness unstructured clinical data were identified as key areas for advancement. Additionally, innovations like cross-site federated learning and automated redaction could help address data integration and privacy challenges.<b>Conclusion:</b> This review underscores the transformative potential of ML in CLL management. However, addressing limitations, including diverse datasets and enhanced model interpretability, is crucial for fully leveraging ML capabilities in haemato-oncology.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55069,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"volume\":\"31 3\",\"pages\":\"14604582251342178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Informatics Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251342178\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Informatics Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14604582251342178","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价机器学习(ML)模型在慢性淋巴细胞白血病(CLL)分类和治疗中的疗效。方法:回顾2014年至2023年间发表的20项研究,重点关注监督ML模型,以预测患者预后或指导治疗决策。研究通过PubMed、b谷歌Scholar和IEEExplore进行识别,最终搜索于2023年3月完成。纳入标准包括专注于ML在CLL中的应用的研究。排除标准包括缺乏足够方法学或仅关注实验设置而没有临床验证的研究。大多数研究使用小型单中心数据集,这可能导致过拟合,并且对现实环境的适用性有限。结果:尽管数据集有限,但所有回顾的研究都报告了积极的结果,其中一些研究表明临床工作流程有所改善。我们的研究结果提倡使用更大、多模式和多机构的数据集开发ML模型。改进模型可解释性和利用非结构化临床数据的NLP实施被确定为关键的进步领域。此外,跨站点联合学习和自动编校等创新可以帮助解决数据集成和隐私挑战。结论:本综述强调了ML在CLL治疗中的变革性潜力。然而,解决局限性,包括不同的数据集和增强的模型可解释性,对于充分利用ML在血液肿瘤学中的能力至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic review of machine learning applications in the early prediction and management of chronic lymphocytic leukaemia.

Objective: This review assesses the efficacy of machine learning (ML) models for classification and management of Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia (CLL).Methods: Twenty studies published between 2014 and 2023 were reviewed, focusing on supervised ML models to predict patient outcomes or guide treatment decisions. Studies were identified through PubMed, Google Scholar, and IEEExplore, with the final search in March 2023. Inclusion criteria consisted of studies focused on ML applications in CLL. Exclusion criteria included studies lacking sufficient methodology or focused solely on experimental settings without clinical validation. Most studies used small, single-centre datasets, potentially contributing to overfitting and limited applicability to real-world settings.Results: Despite dataset limitations, all reviewed studies reported positive outcomes, with some demonstrating improvements in clinical workflows. Our findings advocate developing ML models using larger, multimodal, and multi-institutional datasets. Improved model interpretability and NLP implementation to harness unstructured clinical data were identified as key areas for advancement. Additionally, innovations like cross-site federated learning and automated redaction could help address data integration and privacy challenges.Conclusion: This review underscores the transformative potential of ML in CLL management. However, addressing limitations, including diverse datasets and enhanced model interpretability, is crucial for fully leveraging ML capabilities in haemato-oncology.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Health Informatics Journal
Health Informatics Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-MEDICAL INFORMATICS
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
6.70%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Health Informatics Journal is an international peer-reviewed journal. All papers submitted to Health Informatics Journal are subject to peer review by members of a carefully appointed editorial board. The journal operates a conventional single-blind reviewing policy in which the reviewer’s name is always concealed from the submitting author.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信