警报疲劳和压力在沙特阿拉伯重症护理护士:一个横断面研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Nouf Almal Abdullah Alnaimi, Fayza Ahmed Komsan, Rana Alameri, Afnan Alsoyan
{"title":"警报疲劳和压力在沙特阿拉伯重症护理护士:一个横断面研究。","authors":"Nouf Almal Abdullah Alnaimi, Fayza Ahmed Komsan, Rana Alameri, Afnan Alsoyan","doi":"10.1111/nicc.70108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alarm fatigue and stress among critical care nurses (CCNs) are critical issues that can adversely affect both nurse well-being and patient care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess alarm fatigue and stress levels among CCNs in Eastern Saudi Arabia, explore the relationship between these factors and identify significant demographic predictors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed. The study involved 205 CCNs. Data were collected using a self-administered online questionnaire that included the Alarm Fatigue Scale (AFS) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean overall AFS score was 24.68 (standard deviation, SD = 6.79) out of 52, indicating a moderate level of alarm fatigue. Approximately 58.5% of nurses experienced average alarm fatigue, while 11.7% reported high alarm fatigue. The mean overall PSS score was 21.4 (SD = 4.6) out of 40, indicating moderate stress. A total of 84.4% of nurses experiencing moderate stress, while 9.8% reported high stress. A weak, non-significant negative correlation was observed between alarm fatigue and stress (r = -0.131, p = 0.061). Regression analysis revealed that years of experience, age and educational level were significant predictors of alarm fatigue, with nurses aged 40 and above, those with diplomas and those with 1-5 years of experience reporting higher alarm fatigue. Additionally, nurses who reported recent stress and those with lower alarm fatigue levels showed significantly higher perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals that moderate to high levels of alarm fatigue and stress are prevalent among CCNs, with key predictors including clinical experience, age, education level and recent exposure to stress.</p><p><strong>Relevance to practice: </strong>The study findings highlight the need for regular training on alarm management and stress reduction, investment in advanced monitoring systems to minimize false alarms and clear institutional protocols for alarm escalation. Stress management programmes, including mental health support and resilience workshops, are recommended to enhance nurse well-being and improve patient care outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":51264,"journal":{"name":"Nursing in Critical Care","volume":"30 4","pages":"e70108"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alarm Fatigue and Stress Among Critical Care Nurses in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.\",\"authors\":\"Nouf Almal Abdullah Alnaimi, Fayza Ahmed Komsan, Rana Alameri, Afnan Alsoyan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/nicc.70108\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alarm fatigue and stress among critical care nurses (CCNs) are critical issues that can adversely affect both nurse well-being and patient care.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to assess alarm fatigue and stress levels among CCNs in Eastern Saudi Arabia, explore the relationship between these factors and identify significant demographic predictors.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed. The study involved 205 CCNs. Data were collected using a self-administered online questionnaire that included the Alarm Fatigue Scale (AFS) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean overall AFS score was 24.68 (standard deviation, SD = 6.79) out of 52, indicating a moderate level of alarm fatigue. Approximately 58.5% of nurses experienced average alarm fatigue, while 11.7% reported high alarm fatigue. The mean overall PSS score was 21.4 (SD = 4.6) out of 40, indicating moderate stress. A total of 84.4% of nurses experiencing moderate stress, while 9.8% reported high stress. A weak, non-significant negative correlation was observed between alarm fatigue and stress (r = -0.131, p = 0.061). Regression analysis revealed that years of experience, age and educational level were significant predictors of alarm fatigue, with nurses aged 40 and above, those with diplomas and those with 1-5 years of experience reporting higher alarm fatigue. Additionally, nurses who reported recent stress and those with lower alarm fatigue levels showed significantly higher perceived stress.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study reveals that moderate to high levels of alarm fatigue and stress are prevalent among CCNs, with key predictors including clinical experience, age, education level and recent exposure to stress.</p><p><strong>Relevance to practice: </strong>The study findings highlight the need for regular training on alarm management and stress reduction, investment in advanced monitoring systems to minimize false alarms and clear institutional protocols for alarm escalation. Stress management programmes, including mental health support and resilience workshops, are recommended to enhance nurse well-being and improve patient care outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51264,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"volume\":\"30 4\",\"pages\":\"e70108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nursing in Critical Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70108\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nursing in Critical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nicc.70108","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:危重病护理护士(ccn)的警报疲劳和压力是可能对护士福祉和患者护理产生不利影响的关键问题。目的:本研究旨在评估沙特阿拉伯东部ccn的报警疲劳和压力水平,探讨这些因素之间的关系,并确定重要的人口预测因子。研究设计:采用描述性横断面设计。该研究涉及205个ccn。数据收集使用自我管理的在线问卷,包括报警疲劳量表(AFS)和感知压力量表(PSS)。结果:平均AFS总分为24.68分(标准差,SD = 6.79),评分为52分,提示报警疲劳程度中等。大约58.5%的护士经历过平均警报疲劳,而11.7%的护士报告高度警报疲劳。平均总PSS评分为21.4 (SD = 4.6)(满分40分),表明中度压力。共有84.4%的护士有中度压力,而9.8%的护士有高度压力。警觉性疲劳与应激之间存在弱的、不显著的负相关(r = -0.131, p = 0.061)。回归分析显示,工作年限、年龄和受教育程度是报警疲劳的显著预测因子,其中40岁及以上护士、大专以上护士和1-5年工作经验护士的报警疲劳程度较高。此外,报告最近有压力的护士和警报疲劳水平较低的护士表现出明显更高的感知压力。结论:研究表明,中高水平的报警疲劳和压力在ccn中普遍存在,其关键预测因素包括临床经验、年龄、教育水平和最近的压力暴露。与实践的相关性:研究结果强调需要定期对警报管理和减轻压力进行培训,投资先进的监测系统以尽量减少误报,并明确警报升级的机构协议。建议制定压力管理方案,包括心理健康支助和复原力讲习班,以提高护士的福利,改善对病人的护理结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alarm Fatigue and Stress Among Critical Care Nurses in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Background: Alarm fatigue and stress among critical care nurses (CCNs) are critical issues that can adversely affect both nurse well-being and patient care.

Aim: This study aimed to assess alarm fatigue and stress levels among CCNs in Eastern Saudi Arabia, explore the relationship between these factors and identify significant demographic predictors.

Study design: A descriptive cross-sectional design was employed. The study involved 205 CCNs. Data were collected using a self-administered online questionnaire that included the Alarm Fatigue Scale (AFS) and the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS).

Results: The mean overall AFS score was 24.68 (standard deviation, SD = 6.79) out of 52, indicating a moderate level of alarm fatigue. Approximately 58.5% of nurses experienced average alarm fatigue, while 11.7% reported high alarm fatigue. The mean overall PSS score was 21.4 (SD = 4.6) out of 40, indicating moderate stress. A total of 84.4% of nurses experiencing moderate stress, while 9.8% reported high stress. A weak, non-significant negative correlation was observed between alarm fatigue and stress (r = -0.131, p = 0.061). Regression analysis revealed that years of experience, age and educational level were significant predictors of alarm fatigue, with nurses aged 40 and above, those with diplomas and those with 1-5 years of experience reporting higher alarm fatigue. Additionally, nurses who reported recent stress and those with lower alarm fatigue levels showed significantly higher perceived stress.

Conclusion: The study reveals that moderate to high levels of alarm fatigue and stress are prevalent among CCNs, with key predictors including clinical experience, age, education level and recent exposure to stress.

Relevance to practice: The study findings highlight the need for regular training on alarm management and stress reduction, investment in advanced monitoring systems to minimize false alarms and clear institutional protocols for alarm escalation. Stress management programmes, including mental health support and resilience workshops, are recommended to enhance nurse well-being and improve patient care outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
109
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nursing in Critical Care is an international peer-reviewed journal covering any aspect of critical care nursing practice, research, education or management. Critical care nursing is defined as the whole spectrum of skills, knowledge and attitudes utilised by practitioners in any setting where adults or children, and their families, are experiencing acute and critical illness. Such settings encompass general and specialist hospitals, and the community. Nursing in Critical Care covers the diverse specialities of critical care nursing including surgery, medicine, cardiac, renal, neurosciences, haematology, obstetrics, accident and emergency, neonatal nursing and paediatrics. Papers published in the journal normally fall into one of the following categories: -research reports -literature reviews -developments in practice, education or management -reflections on practice
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信