影响ICU护士拔管后吞咽困难的知识、态度和行为的个体和组织因素:一项横断面多中心研究。

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Long Huang, Fan Zeng, Anqi Liang, Lu Wang, Chun-Feng Luo
{"title":"影响ICU护士拔管后吞咽困难的知识、态度和行为的个体和组织因素:一项横断面多中心研究。","authors":"Long Huang, Fan Zeng, Anqi Liang, Lu Wang, Chun-Feng Luo","doi":"10.1111/jocn.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysphagia is a prevalent and critical issue in critically ill patients who have undergone mechanical ventilation. The knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of ICU nurses are determinants of the effectiveness of post-extubation dysphagia (PED) management. However, existing evidence regarding the current KAP status of PED among ICU nurses remains insufficient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the current status of ICU nurses' KAP regarding PED, along with associated individual and organisational factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August to September 2024, a cross-sectional, multicentre study was conducted on a convenience sample of 305 ICU nurses from 15 tertiary hospitals in 10 cities of Guangdong Province, China. An online self-reported structured questionnaire was used to collect data on the KAP of PED among ICU nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 305 valid questionnaires were analysed. The overall mean score was (70.08 ± 15.34). The mean scores of knowledge, attitude, and practice were (78.10 ± 28.98), (80.02 ± 13.27), and (52.13 ± 22.94), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the individual factors related to the total score included confidence in PED management (β = 0.356, p < 0.001), and the organisational factors included leadership support (β = 0.210, p < 0.001), unit compliance with PED screening and treatment protocols (β = - 0.169, p = 0.001), and availability of PED educational resources (β = 0.156, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICU nurses possess a relatively extensive knowledge base and exhibit positive attitudes toward PED, but there is still room for practice improvement. Besides strengthening the training of ICU nurses on PED-related knowledge, formulating standardised protocols, establishing a multidisciplinary management team, creating a favourable improvement atmosphere, and providing sufficient training resources are indispensable measures for enhancing the quality of clinical PED management.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>To enhance the quality of PED management, it is advisable to formulate a multi-aceted support strategy targeting both organisations and individuals, thereby facilitating the implementation of relevant practices.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement of cross-sectional studies was followed for reporting in the study.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public involvement.</p>","PeriodicalId":50236,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individual and Organisational Factors Influencing Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Post-Extubation Dysphagia in ICU Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Multicentre Study.\",\"authors\":\"Long Huang, Fan Zeng, Anqi Liang, Lu Wang, Chun-Feng Luo\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jocn.70032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysphagia is a prevalent and critical issue in critically ill patients who have undergone mechanical ventilation. The knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of ICU nurses are determinants of the effectiveness of post-extubation dysphagia (PED) management. However, existing evidence regarding the current KAP status of PED among ICU nurses remains insufficient.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to assess the current status of ICU nurses' KAP regarding PED, along with associated individual and organisational factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From August to September 2024, a cross-sectional, multicentre study was conducted on a convenience sample of 305 ICU nurses from 15 tertiary hospitals in 10 cities of Guangdong Province, China. An online self-reported structured questionnaire was used to collect data on the KAP of PED among ICU nurses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 305 valid questionnaires were analysed. The overall mean score was (70.08 ± 15.34). The mean scores of knowledge, attitude, and practice were (78.10 ± 28.98), (80.02 ± 13.27), and (52.13 ± 22.94), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the individual factors related to the total score included confidence in PED management (β = 0.356, p < 0.001), and the organisational factors included leadership support (β = 0.210, p < 0.001), unit compliance with PED screening and treatment protocols (β = - 0.169, p = 0.001), and availability of PED educational resources (β = 0.156, p = 0.002).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ICU nurses possess a relatively extensive knowledge base and exhibit positive attitudes toward PED, but there is still room for practice improvement. Besides strengthening the training of ICU nurses on PED-related knowledge, formulating standardised protocols, establishing a multidisciplinary management team, creating a favourable improvement atmosphere, and providing sufficient training resources are indispensable measures for enhancing the quality of clinical PED management.</p><p><strong>Relevance to clinical practice: </strong>To enhance the quality of PED management, it is advisable to formulate a multi-aceted support strategy targeting both organisations and individuals, thereby facilitating the implementation of relevant practices.</p><p><strong>Reporting method: </strong>The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement of cross-sectional studies was followed for reporting in the study.</p><p><strong>Patient or public contribution: </strong>No patient or public involvement.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50236,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70032\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:吞咽困难是接受机械通气的危重患者中一个普遍和严重的问题。ICU护士的知识、态度和实践(KAP)是拔管后吞咽困难(PED)管理有效性的决定因素。然而,关于目前ICU护士PED的KAP状况的现有证据仍然不足。目的:本研究旨在评估ICU护士关于PED的KAP现状,以及相关的个人和组织因素。方法:于2024年8 - 9月,对广东省10个城市15家三级医院的305名ICU护士进行横断面、多中心的方便抽样研究。采用在线自述式结构化问卷收集ICU护士对PED的认知程度。结果:共分析有效问卷305份。总平均评分为(70.08±15.34)分。知识、态度和实践的平均得分分别为(78.10±28.98)分、(80.02±13.27)分和(52.13±22.94)分。多因素分析显示,影响总分的个体因素包括对PED管理的信心(β = 0.356, p)。结论:ICU护士对PED有较广泛的知识基础和积极的态度,但仍有实践改进的空间。加强对ICU护士PED相关知识的培训,制定规范化的方案,建立多学科的管理团队,营造良好的改进氛围,提供充足的培训资源,是提高临床PED管理质量不可或缺的措施。切合临床实践:为提高PED管理的质量,建议制定针对组织和个人的多层面支持策略,从而促进相关实践的实施。报告方法:本研究遵循《加强流行病学观察性研究报告》(STROBE)横断面研究声明进行报告。患者或公众贡献:无患者或公众参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Individual and Organisational Factors Influencing Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Regarding Post-Extubation Dysphagia in ICU Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Multicentre Study.

Background: Dysphagia is a prevalent and critical issue in critically ill patients who have undergone mechanical ventilation. The knowledge, attitude, and practice (KAP) of ICU nurses are determinants of the effectiveness of post-extubation dysphagia (PED) management. However, existing evidence regarding the current KAP status of PED among ICU nurses remains insufficient.

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the current status of ICU nurses' KAP regarding PED, along with associated individual and organisational factors.

Methods: From August to September 2024, a cross-sectional, multicentre study was conducted on a convenience sample of 305 ICU nurses from 15 tertiary hospitals in 10 cities of Guangdong Province, China. An online self-reported structured questionnaire was used to collect data on the KAP of PED among ICU nurses.

Results: A total of 305 valid questionnaires were analysed. The overall mean score was (70.08 ± 15.34). The mean scores of knowledge, attitude, and practice were (78.10 ± 28.98), (80.02 ± 13.27), and (52.13 ± 22.94), respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the individual factors related to the total score included confidence in PED management (β = 0.356, p < 0.001), and the organisational factors included leadership support (β = 0.210, p < 0.001), unit compliance with PED screening and treatment protocols (β = - 0.169, p = 0.001), and availability of PED educational resources (β = 0.156, p = 0.002).

Conclusions: ICU nurses possess a relatively extensive knowledge base and exhibit positive attitudes toward PED, but there is still room for practice improvement. Besides strengthening the training of ICU nurses on PED-related knowledge, formulating standardised protocols, establishing a multidisciplinary management team, creating a favourable improvement atmosphere, and providing sufficient training resources are indispensable measures for enhancing the quality of clinical PED management.

Relevance to clinical practice: To enhance the quality of PED management, it is advisable to formulate a multi-aceted support strategy targeting both organisations and individuals, thereby facilitating the implementation of relevant practices.

Reporting method: The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement of cross-sectional studies was followed for reporting in the study.

Patient or public contribution: No patient or public involvement.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
2.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Nursing (JCN) is an international, peer reviewed, scientific journal that seeks to promote the development and exchange of knowledge that is directly relevant to all spheres of nursing practice. The primary aim is to promote a high standard of clinically related scholarship which advances and supports the practice and discipline of nursing. The Journal also aims to promote the international exchange of ideas and experience that draws from the different cultures in which practice takes place. Further, JCN seeks to enrich insight into clinical need and the implications for nursing intervention and models of service delivery. Emphasis is placed on promoting critical debate on the art and science of nursing practice. JCN is essential reading for anyone involved in nursing practice, whether clinicians, researchers, educators, managers, policy makers, or students. The development of clinical practice and the changing patterns of inter-professional working are also central to JCN''s scope of interest. Contributions are welcomed from other health professionals on issues that have a direct impact on nursing practice. We publish high quality papers from across the methodological spectrum that make an important and novel contribution to the field of clinical nursing (regardless of where care is provided), and which demonstrate clinical application and international relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信