卫生保健专业人员的残疾和种族隐性态度的交叉。

IF 3.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Carli Friedman
{"title":"卫生保健专业人员的残疾和种族隐性态度的交叉。","authors":"Carli Friedman","doi":"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101924","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Focusing on intersectionality is necessary not only to better understand how oppression impacts people, but also to reduce the harmful impacts of discrimination. While past research has separately found most health care professionals are implicitly (unconsciously) biased against disability, and implicitly biased against people of color, and some also self-report explicit (conscious) biases, to our knowledge, there is little to no research about health care professionals' intersectional attitudes. Yet, we do know that health care professionals' attitudes and biases impact the quality of care they provide and the outcomes of those they serve. Thus, it is critical to uncover more information about their explicit and implicit attitudes, especially intersectional attitudes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the intersecting disability and race attitudes of health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We had 784 health care professionals complete the Intersecting Disability and Race Attitudes Implicit Association Test (IDRA-IAT) and an explicit measure (January-March 2025).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health care professionals implicitly preferred nondisabled white people (M = 0.18) the most, then disabled white people (M = 0.08), and then disabled (M = -0.12) and nondisabled people of color (M = -0.14) the least. There was a significant gap between participants' explicit and implicit attitudes, with self-report explicit attitudes showing an opposite pattern as implicit attitudes, suggesting health care professionals may be unaware of the scope of their implicit biases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Everyone deserves high quality healthcare; until we reduce health care professionals' biases, health equity will not be possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":49300,"journal":{"name":"Disability and Health Journal","volume":" ","pages":"101924"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intersecting disability and race implicit attitudes of health care professionals.\",\"authors\":\"Carli Friedman\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101924\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Focusing on intersectionality is necessary not only to better understand how oppression impacts people, but also to reduce the harmful impacts of discrimination. While past research has separately found most health care professionals are implicitly (unconsciously) biased against disability, and implicitly biased against people of color, and some also self-report explicit (conscious) biases, to our knowledge, there is little to no research about health care professionals' intersectional attitudes. Yet, we do know that health care professionals' attitudes and biases impact the quality of care they provide and the outcomes of those they serve. Thus, it is critical to uncover more information about their explicit and implicit attitudes, especially intersectional attitudes.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to examine the intersecting disability and race attitudes of health care professionals.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We had 784 health care professionals complete the Intersecting Disability and Race Attitudes Implicit Association Test (IDRA-IAT) and an explicit measure (January-March 2025).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Health care professionals implicitly preferred nondisabled white people (M = 0.18) the most, then disabled white people (M = 0.08), and then disabled (M = -0.12) and nondisabled people of color (M = -0.14) the least. There was a significant gap between participants' explicit and implicit attitudes, with self-report explicit attitudes showing an opposite pattern as implicit attitudes, suggesting health care professionals may be unaware of the scope of their implicit biases.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Everyone deserves high quality healthcare; until we reduce health care professionals' biases, health equity will not be possible.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"101924\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disability and Health Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101924\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disability and Health Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2025.101924","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:关注交叉性不仅对于更好地理解压迫如何影响人们,而且对于减少歧视的有害影响是必要的。虽然过去的研究分别发现,大多数医疗保健专业人员对残疾人有隐性(无意识)偏见,对有色人种也有隐性偏见,有些人还自我报告有显性(有意识)偏见,但据我们所知,关于医疗保健专业人员的交叉态度的研究很少或根本没有。然而,我们确实知道,卫生保健专业人员的态度和偏见会影响他们提供的护理质量和他们所服务的人的结果。因此,揭示更多关于他们的外显和内隐态度,特别是交叉态度的信息是至关重要的。目的:本研究的目的是探讨卫生保健专业人员对残疾和种族的交叉态度。方法:对784名卫生保健专业人员进行残疾与种族态度交叉内隐关联测验(IDRA-IAT)和外显测验(2025年1 - 3月)。结果:卫生保健专业人员隐性偏好非残疾白人(M = 0.18)最多,其次是残疾白人(M = 0.08),其次是残疾(M = -0.12)和非残疾有色人种(M = -0.14)最少。参与者的外显态度和内隐态度之间存在显著差异,自我报告的外显态度与内隐态度呈现相反的模式,这表明医护人员可能没有意识到他们的内隐偏见的范围。结论:人人都应享有高质量的医疗服务;除非我们减少卫生保健专业人员的偏见,否则不可能实现卫生公平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intersecting disability and race implicit attitudes of health care professionals.

Background: Focusing on intersectionality is necessary not only to better understand how oppression impacts people, but also to reduce the harmful impacts of discrimination. While past research has separately found most health care professionals are implicitly (unconsciously) biased against disability, and implicitly biased against people of color, and some also self-report explicit (conscious) biases, to our knowledge, there is little to no research about health care professionals' intersectional attitudes. Yet, we do know that health care professionals' attitudes and biases impact the quality of care they provide and the outcomes of those they serve. Thus, it is critical to uncover more information about their explicit and implicit attitudes, especially intersectional attitudes.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the intersecting disability and race attitudes of health care professionals.

Methods: We had 784 health care professionals complete the Intersecting Disability and Race Attitudes Implicit Association Test (IDRA-IAT) and an explicit measure (January-March 2025).

Results: Health care professionals implicitly preferred nondisabled white people (M = 0.18) the most, then disabled white people (M = 0.08), and then disabled (M = -0.12) and nondisabled people of color (M = -0.14) the least. There was a significant gap between participants' explicit and implicit attitudes, with self-report explicit attitudes showing an opposite pattern as implicit attitudes, suggesting health care professionals may be unaware of the scope of their implicit biases.

Conclusions: Everyone deserves high quality healthcare; until we reduce health care professionals' biases, health equity will not be possible.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Disability and Health Journal
Disability and Health Journal HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
134
审稿时长
34 days
期刊介绍: Disability and Health Journal is a scientific, scholarly, and multidisciplinary journal for reporting original contributions that advance knowledge in disability and health. Topics may be related to global health, quality of life, and specific health conditions as they relate to disability. Such contributions include: • Reports of empirical research on the characteristics of persons with disabilities, environment, health outcomes, and determinants of health • Reports of empirical research on the Systematic or other evidence-based reviews and tightly conceived theoretical interpretations of research literature • Reports of empirical research on the Evaluative research on new interventions, technologies, and programs • Reports of empirical research on the Reports on issues or policies affecting the health and/or quality of life for persons with disabilities, using a scientific base.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信