基督教对姑息性镇静的看法:文献研究。

IF 2.5 2区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Jonathan Lambaerts, Bert Broeckaert
{"title":"基督教对姑息性镇静的看法:文献研究。","authors":"Jonathan Lambaerts, Bert Broeckaert","doi":"10.1186/s12904-025-01817-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Christianity has always been concerned about the fate of the sick and the dying. Charity is one of the seven Christian virtues and is seen as an act of love for one's neighbour. At the same time, Christianity is a strong defender of the dignity of human life, especially the most vulnerable. In the context of advanced disease and end of life, all major Christian traditions (Anglican, Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Protestant) advocate appropriate care to protect the dignity of those suffering from illness or facing the prospect of death. This translates into a strong opposition to any treatment that actively seeks to end a person's life, such as euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. Less clear is where these Christian traditions stand on palliative sedation; a treatment that aims to alleviate the suffering caused by refractory symptoms by lowering the level of consciousness. However, it is important to know and understand a religious tradition's position on a particular treatment. Religious beliefs influence the decision-making process of both patients and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive and systematic literature study was undertaken to determine the position of the four major Christian traditions (Anglican, Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Protestant).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although sources are scarce, there are explicit positions on palliative sedation in each of the four Christian traditions has regarding palliative sedation. These positions can be found in official Church documents, in academic debate or in the broader bioethical debate within each community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, there is a positive but cautious attitude towards palliative sedation in the four major Christian traditions. All recognise that palliative sedation can help alleviate patient suffering. They remain cautious in their support, however, as they consider the line between palliative sedation and life-ending treatments (e.g. euthanasia) to be too blurred. Moreover, the Christian traditions are aware that lowering the level of consciousness is not without its problems. Palliative sedation should therefore not be used without good reason.</p>","PeriodicalId":48945,"journal":{"name":"BMC Palliative Care","volume":"24 1","pages":"195"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243377/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Christian perspectives on palliative sedation: a literature study.\",\"authors\":\"Jonathan Lambaerts, Bert Broeckaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12904-025-01817-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Christianity has always been concerned about the fate of the sick and the dying. Charity is one of the seven Christian virtues and is seen as an act of love for one's neighbour. At the same time, Christianity is a strong defender of the dignity of human life, especially the most vulnerable. In the context of advanced disease and end of life, all major Christian traditions (Anglican, Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Protestant) advocate appropriate care to protect the dignity of those suffering from illness or facing the prospect of death. This translates into a strong opposition to any treatment that actively seeks to end a person's life, such as euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. Less clear is where these Christian traditions stand on palliative sedation; a treatment that aims to alleviate the suffering caused by refractory symptoms by lowering the level of consciousness. However, it is important to know and understand a religious tradition's position on a particular treatment. Religious beliefs influence the decision-making process of both patients and healthcare professionals.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>A comprehensive and systematic literature study was undertaken to determine the position of the four major Christian traditions (Anglican, Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Protestant).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although sources are scarce, there are explicit positions on palliative sedation in each of the four Christian traditions has regarding palliative sedation. These positions can be found in official Church documents, in academic debate or in the broader bioethical debate within each community.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Overall, there is a positive but cautious attitude towards palliative sedation in the four major Christian traditions. All recognise that palliative sedation can help alleviate patient suffering. They remain cautious in their support, however, as they consider the line between palliative sedation and life-ending treatments (e.g. euthanasia) to be too blurred. Moreover, the Christian traditions are aware that lowering the level of consciousness is not without its problems. Palliative sedation should therefore not be used without good reason.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48945,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"195\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12243377/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Palliative Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01817-z\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12904-025-01817-z","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:基督教一直关注病人和临终者的命运。慈善是基督教的七大美德之一,被视为爱邻居的一种行为。与此同时,基督教是人类生命尊严的有力捍卫者,尤其是最弱势群体。在疾病晚期和生命终结的情况下,所有主要的基督教传统(英国国教、天主教、东正教和新教)都主张给予适当照顾,以保护那些身患疾病或面临死亡前景的人的尊严。这转化为对任何积极寻求结束一个人生命的治疗的强烈反对,例如安乐死或医生协助自杀。不太清楚的是,这些基督教传统对姑息性镇静的立场;一种旨在通过降低意识水平来减轻由难治性症状引起的痛苦的治疗方法。然而,重要的是要知道和理解宗教传统对特定治疗的立场。宗教信仰影响患者和医疗保健专业人员的决策过程。方法:通过全面系统的文献研究,确定基督教四大传统(英国国教、天主教、东正教和新教)的地位。结果:虽然来源是稀缺的,有明确的立场姑息性镇静在每个四个基督教传统都有关于姑息性镇静。这些立场可以在教会的官方文件、学术辩论或每个社区内更广泛的生物伦理辩论中找到。结论:总体而言,基督教四大传统对姑息性镇静的态度是积极而谨慎的。所有人都认识到,姑息性镇静可以帮助减轻病人的痛苦。然而,他们仍然谨慎地支持,因为他们认为姑息性镇静和结束生命的治疗(如安乐死)之间的界限太模糊了。此外,基督教传统意识到,降低意识水平并非没有问题。因此,如果没有充分的理由,姑息性镇静不应使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Christian perspectives on palliative sedation: a literature study.

Christian perspectives on palliative sedation: a literature study.

Background: Christianity has always been concerned about the fate of the sick and the dying. Charity is one of the seven Christian virtues and is seen as an act of love for one's neighbour. At the same time, Christianity is a strong defender of the dignity of human life, especially the most vulnerable. In the context of advanced disease and end of life, all major Christian traditions (Anglican, Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Protestant) advocate appropriate care to protect the dignity of those suffering from illness or facing the prospect of death. This translates into a strong opposition to any treatment that actively seeks to end a person's life, such as euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide. Less clear is where these Christian traditions stand on palliative sedation; a treatment that aims to alleviate the suffering caused by refractory symptoms by lowering the level of consciousness. However, it is important to know and understand a religious tradition's position on a particular treatment. Religious beliefs influence the decision-making process of both patients and healthcare professionals.

Method: A comprehensive and systematic literature study was undertaken to determine the position of the four major Christian traditions (Anglican, Catholic, Eastern Orthodox and Protestant).

Results: Although sources are scarce, there are explicit positions on palliative sedation in each of the four Christian traditions has regarding palliative sedation. These positions can be found in official Church documents, in academic debate or in the broader bioethical debate within each community.

Conclusions: Overall, there is a positive but cautious attitude towards palliative sedation in the four major Christian traditions. All recognise that palliative sedation can help alleviate patient suffering. They remain cautious in their support, however, as they consider the line between palliative sedation and life-ending treatments (e.g. euthanasia) to be too blurred. Moreover, the Christian traditions are aware that lowering the level of consciousness is not without its problems. Palliative sedation should therefore not be used without good reason.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Palliative Care
BMC Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
9.70%
发文量
201
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Palliative Care is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in the clinical, scientific, ethical and policy issues, local and international, regarding all aspects of hospice and palliative care for the dying and for those with profound suffering related to chronic illness.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信