{"title":"住院病人研究中的伦理挑战：现象学研究。","authors":"Moustaq Karim Khan Rony, Dilruba Akther, Umme Rabeya Peu, Md Shafiul Alam, Abu Zafor Md Shaleah, Md Zahirul Alam, Mst Rina Parvin, Ibne Kayesh, Sandra Rumi Madhu, Daifallah M Alrazeeni, Fazila Akter","doi":"10.1007/s10728-025-00534-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hospital-based research plays a crucial role in advancing medical knowledge, but it also presents significant ethical challenges, particularly when involving hospitalized patients. Ethical concerns such as informed consent, patient autonomy, and the power dynamics between healthcare providers and patients are critical to maintaining the integrity of such research. The aim of this research was to explore and analyze the ethical considerations in conducting research involving hospitalized patients. A qualitative phenomenological approach was used to investigate the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals involved in clinical or public health research in hospital settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 participants from both public and private hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring ethical themes. This study identified five key themes: (1) Ethical challenges in hospital-based research, (2) Informed consent and patient vulnerability, (3) Patient autonomy and decision-making in research, (4) Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and ethical oversight, and (5) Strategies to improve ethical research practices in hospitals. Participants reported concerns about coercion, difficulties in obtaining consent from critically ill patients, conflicts in surrogate decision-making, and delays in IRB approval. The findings also emphasized the importance of ethical training, continuous consent practices, and patient-centered approaches. Ethical research practices in hospital settings require a balance between scientific progress and patient protection. The study emphasizes the need for improved ethical guidelines, better informed consent processes, and ongoing training for healthcare professionals to ensure patient autonomy is respected. The findings also call for streamlined Institutional Review Board (IRB) processes to support timely and ethical research execution.</p>","PeriodicalId":46740,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethical Challenges in Research Involving Hospitalized Patients: A Phenomenological Study.\",\"authors\":\"Moustaq Karim Khan Rony, Dilruba Akther, Umme Rabeya Peu, Md Shafiul Alam, Abu Zafor Md Shaleah, Md Zahirul Alam, Mst Rina Parvin, Ibne Kayesh, Sandra Rumi Madhu, Daifallah M Alrazeeni, Fazila Akter\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10728-025-00534-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Hospital-based research plays a crucial role in advancing medical knowledge, but it also presents significant ethical challenges, particularly when involving hospitalized patients. Ethical concerns such as informed consent, patient autonomy, and the power dynamics between healthcare providers and patients are critical to maintaining the integrity of such research. The aim of this research was to explore and analyze the ethical considerations in conducting research involving hospitalized patients. A qualitative phenomenological approach was used to investigate the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals involved in clinical or public health research in hospital settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 participants from both public and private hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring ethical themes. This study identified five key themes: (1) Ethical challenges in hospital-based research, (2) Informed consent and patient vulnerability, (3) Patient autonomy and decision-making in research, (4) Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and ethical oversight, and (5) Strategies to improve ethical research practices in hospitals. Participants reported concerns about coercion, difficulties in obtaining consent from critically ill patients, conflicts in surrogate decision-making, and delays in IRB approval. The findings also emphasized the importance of ethical training, continuous consent practices, and patient-centered approaches. Ethical research practices in hospital settings require a balance between scientific progress and patient protection. The study emphasizes the need for improved ethical guidelines, better informed consent processes, and ongoing training for healthcare professionals to ensure patient autonomy is respected. The findings also call for streamlined Institutional Review Board (IRB) processes to support timely and ethical research execution.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Care Analysis\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Care Analysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-025-00534-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ETHICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-025-00534-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ethical Challenges in Research Involving Hospitalized Patients: A Phenomenological Study.
Hospital-based research plays a crucial role in advancing medical knowledge, but it also presents significant ethical challenges, particularly when involving hospitalized patients. Ethical concerns such as informed consent, patient autonomy, and the power dynamics between healthcare providers and patients are critical to maintaining the integrity of such research. The aim of this research was to explore and analyze the ethical considerations in conducting research involving hospitalized patients. A qualitative phenomenological approach was used to investigate the experiences and perceptions of healthcare professionals involved in clinical or public health research in hospital settings. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 33 participants from both public and private hospitals in Dhaka, Bangladesh. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify recurring ethical themes. This study identified five key themes: (1) Ethical challenges in hospital-based research, (2) Informed consent and patient vulnerability, (3) Patient autonomy and decision-making in research, (4) Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) and ethical oversight, and (5) Strategies to improve ethical research practices in hospitals. Participants reported concerns about coercion, difficulties in obtaining consent from critically ill patients, conflicts in surrogate decision-making, and delays in IRB approval. The findings also emphasized the importance of ethical training, continuous consent practices, and patient-centered approaches. Ethical research practices in hospital settings require a balance between scientific progress and patient protection. The study emphasizes the need for improved ethical guidelines, better informed consent processes, and ongoing training for healthcare professionals to ensure patient autonomy is respected. The findings also call for streamlined Institutional Review Board (IRB) processes to support timely and ethical research execution.
期刊介绍：
Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
