系统性抗生素在预防重症监护病房患者呼吸机相关性肺炎中的作用:来自系统回顾和荟萃分析的见解。

IF 0.7 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice Pub Date : 2025-06-13 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_21_25
Niloofar Etemad, Koorosh Etemad, Shadi Farsaei, Azadeh Moghaddas
{"title":"系统性抗生素在预防重症监护病房患者呼吸机相关性肺炎中的作用:来自系统回顾和荟萃分析的见解。","authors":"Niloofar Etemad, Koorosh Etemad, Shadi Farsaei, Azadeh Moghaddas","doi":"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_21_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effectiveness of prophylactic systemic antibiotics in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in intensive care units (ICUs) remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of VAP among the IMV population. We conducted an extensive search of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from their inception to December 2023. We aimed to identify studies evaluating the effects of prophylactic systemic antibiotics on VAP, early- and late-onset VAP, mortality rates, median ventilation days, and lengths of ICU and hospital stays, facilitating a comprehensive meta-analysis. Seven studies involving 939 patients indicated that the use of preventive antibiotics reduced VAP compared to control groups (risk ratio [RR] of 0.61). The early-onset VAP rate was also lower in the treatment group compared to the control groups (RR of 0.40). Prophylactic systemic antibiotics may effectively reduce VAP incidence in ICU patients on IMV but do not significantly impact other clinical outcomes. These findings may stem from the fact that VAP accounts for a small fraction of ICU deaths, and most studies focused on early-onset VAP, which has lower mortality. However, definitive recommendations cannot be established without the necessity of well-designed randomized controlled trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":17158,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","volume":"14 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237149/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of Systemic Antibiotics in Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Niloofar Etemad, Koorosh Etemad, Shadi Farsaei, Azadeh Moghaddas\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_21_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The effectiveness of prophylactic systemic antibiotics in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in intensive care units (ICUs) remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of VAP among the IMV population. We conducted an extensive search of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from their inception to December 2023. We aimed to identify studies evaluating the effects of prophylactic systemic antibiotics on VAP, early- and late-onset VAP, mortality rates, median ventilation days, and lengths of ICU and hospital stays, facilitating a comprehensive meta-analysis. Seven studies involving 939 patients indicated that the use of preventive antibiotics reduced VAP compared to control groups (risk ratio [RR] of 0.61). The early-onset VAP rate was also lower in the treatment group compared to the control groups (RR of 0.40). Prophylactic systemic antibiotics may effectively reduce VAP incidence in ICU patients on IMV but do not significantly impact other clinical outcomes. These findings may stem from the fact that VAP accounts for a small fraction of ICU deaths, and most studies focused on early-onset VAP, which has lower mortality. However, definitive recommendations cannot be established without the necessity of well-designed randomized controlled trials.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17158,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12237149/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_21_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jrpp.jrpp_21_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

预防性全身性抗生素在重症监护病房(icu)接受有创机械通气(IMV)患者中预防呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的有效性仍不确定。本荟萃分析旨在评估抗生素预防在降低IMV人群VAP发生率方面的疗效。我们对数据库进行了广泛的搜索,包括PubMed、Web of Science、Embase和Cochrane Library,从它们成立到2023年12月。我们的目的是确定评估预防性全身性抗生素对VAP、早发性和晚发性VAP、死亡率、中位通气天数、ICU和住院时间长短影响的研究,促进全面的荟萃分析。7项涉及939例患者的研究表明,与对照组相比,使用预防性抗生素可降低VAP(风险比[RR]为0.61)。治疗组早发性VAP发生率也低于对照组(RR = 0.40)。预防性全身性抗生素可有效降低IMV ICU患者VAP发生率,但对其他临床结局无显著影响。这些发现可能源于这样一个事实,即VAP占ICU死亡的一小部分,大多数研究都集中在死亡率较低的早发性VAP上。然而,如果没有精心设计的随机对照试验,就无法建立明确的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Role of Systemic Antibiotics in Preventing Ventilator-associated Pneumonia in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Insights from a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The effectiveness of prophylactic systemic antibiotics in preventing ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in patients receiving invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) in intensive care units (ICUs) remains uncertain. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in reducing the incidence of VAP among the IMV population. We conducted an extensive search of databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, from their inception to December 2023. We aimed to identify studies evaluating the effects of prophylactic systemic antibiotics on VAP, early- and late-onset VAP, mortality rates, median ventilation days, and lengths of ICU and hospital stays, facilitating a comprehensive meta-analysis. Seven studies involving 939 patients indicated that the use of preventive antibiotics reduced VAP compared to control groups (risk ratio [RR] of 0.61). The early-onset VAP rate was also lower in the treatment group compared to the control groups (RR of 0.40). Prophylactic systemic antibiotics may effectively reduce VAP incidence in ICU patients on IMV but do not significantly impact other clinical outcomes. These findings may stem from the fact that VAP accounts for a small fraction of ICU deaths, and most studies focused on early-onset VAP, which has lower mortality. However, definitive recommendations cannot be established without the necessity of well-designed randomized controlled trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice
Journal of Research in Pharmacy Practice PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
21 weeks
期刊介绍: The main focus of the journal will be on evidence-based drug-related medical researches (with clinical pharmacists’ intervention or documentation), particularly in the Eastern Mediterranean region. However, a wide range of closely related issues will be also covered. These will include clinical studies in the field of pharmaceutical care, reporting adverse drug reactions and human medical toxicology, pharmaco-epidemiology and toxico-epidemiology (poisoning epidemiology), social aspects of pharmacy practice, pharmacy education and economic evaluations of treatment protocols (e.g. cost-effectiveness studies). Local reports of medication utilization studies at hospital or pharmacy levels will only be considered for peer-review process only if they have a new and useful message for the international pharmacy practice professionals and readers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信