LODESTAR:一项鲁卡帕尼在具有同源重组修复基因致病性种系或体细胞变异的实体肿瘤中的单臂II期研究。

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
JCO precision oncology Pub Date : 2025-07-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-09 DOI:10.1200/PO-25-00090
Sriram Anbil, Nicholas J Seewald, E Gabriela Chiorean, Maen Hussein, Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi, Doug E Laux, Gary K Schwartz, Geoffrey I Shapiro, Kevin K Lin, Marcia Craib, Lara Maloney, Karen McLachlan, Hanna Tukachinsky, Alexa B Schrock, Shuoguo Wang, Ethan S Sokol, Brennan Decker, Katherine L Nathanson, Susan M Domchek, Kim A Reiss
{"title":"LODESTAR:一项鲁卡帕尼在具有同源重组修复基因致病性种系或体细胞变异的实体肿瘤中的单臂II期研究。","authors":"Sriram Anbil, Nicholas J Seewald, E Gabriela Chiorean, Maen Hussein, Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi, Doug E Laux, Gary K Schwartz, Geoffrey I Shapiro, Kevin K Lin, Marcia Craib, Lara Maloney, Karen McLachlan, Hanna Tukachinsky, Alexa B Schrock, Shuoguo Wang, Ethan S Sokol, Brennan Decker, Katherine L Nathanson, Susan M Domchek, Kim A Reiss","doi":"10.1200/PO-25-00090","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor utility across solid tumors and identify biomarkers that predict sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This single-arm phase II study assessed rucaparib monotherapy in patients with solid tumors and pathogenic variants (PVs) in <i>BRCA1</i>, <i>BRCA2</i>, <i>PALB2</i>, <i>RAD51C</i>, and <i>RAD51D</i> (cohort A) or <i>BARD1</i>, <i>BRIP1</i>, <i>FANCA</i>, <i>NBN</i>, and <i>RAD51B</i> (cohort B). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) in cohort A. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. A scar-based homologous recombination deficiency signature (HRDsig) and platinum sensitivity status were explored post hoc.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients in cohort A and 12 in cohort B were evaluable for efficacy. ORR of cohort A was 18% (95% CI, 10 to 30). A significantly higher ORR was observed with HRDsig+ tumors compared with HRDsig- tumors (32%; 95% CI, 15 to 54 <i>v</i> 0%; 95% CI, 0 to 14; <i>P</i> < .01). In the entire study population, DCR was 65% (95% CI, 53 to 76), median PFS (mPFS) 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.68 to 7.82), and median OS 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.6 to inferred). PFS and hazard of death from any cause was significantly better for platinum-sensitive tumors (mPFS: 7.8 months <i>v</i> 3.5 months; <i>P</i> = .02; hazard ratio, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.55]). Tumor histology was not independently predictive of outcome. Tumors with PVs in cohort A genes were more likely to be HRDsig+ than tumors with PVs in cohort B genes. Analysis of a large commercial database showed that in noncanonical tumors with <i>BRCA</i> PVs, 30.2% were HRDsig+.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rucaparib has activity in HRDsig+ solid tumors with PVs in homologous recombination repair genes, regardless of histology. Platinum sensitivity correlated with improved outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14797,"journal":{"name":"JCO precision oncology","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500090"},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"LODESTAR: A Single-Arm Phase II Study of Rucaparib in Solid Tumors With Pathogenic Germline or Somatic Variants in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes.\",\"authors\":\"Sriram Anbil, Nicholas J Seewald, E Gabriela Chiorean, Maen Hussein, Pashtoon Murtaza Kasi, Doug E Laux, Gary K Schwartz, Geoffrey I Shapiro, Kevin K Lin, Marcia Craib, Lara Maloney, Karen McLachlan, Hanna Tukachinsky, Alexa B Schrock, Shuoguo Wang, Ethan S Sokol, Brennan Decker, Katherine L Nathanson, Susan M Domchek, Kim A Reiss\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/PO-25-00090\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To explore poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor utility across solid tumors and identify biomarkers that predict sensitivity.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This single-arm phase II study assessed rucaparib monotherapy in patients with solid tumors and pathogenic variants (PVs) in <i>BRCA1</i>, <i>BRCA2</i>, <i>PALB2</i>, <i>RAD51C</i>, and <i>RAD51D</i> (cohort A) or <i>BARD1</i>, <i>BRIP1</i>, <i>FANCA</i>, <i>NBN</i>, and <i>RAD51B</i> (cohort B). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) in cohort A. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. A scar-based homologous recombination deficiency signature (HRDsig) and platinum sensitivity status were explored post hoc.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-one patients in cohort A and 12 in cohort B were evaluable for efficacy. ORR of cohort A was 18% (95% CI, 10 to 30). A significantly higher ORR was observed with HRDsig+ tumors compared with HRDsig- tumors (32%; 95% CI, 15 to 54 <i>v</i> 0%; 95% CI, 0 to 14; <i>P</i> < .01). In the entire study population, DCR was 65% (95% CI, 53 to 76), median PFS (mPFS) 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.68 to 7.82), and median OS 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.6 to inferred). PFS and hazard of death from any cause was significantly better for platinum-sensitive tumors (mPFS: 7.8 months <i>v</i> 3.5 months; <i>P</i> = .02; hazard ratio, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.55]). Tumor histology was not independently predictive of outcome. Tumors with PVs in cohort A genes were more likely to be HRDsig+ than tumors with PVs in cohort B genes. Analysis of a large commercial database showed that in noncanonical tumors with <i>BRCA</i> PVs, 30.2% were HRDsig+.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Rucaparib has activity in HRDsig+ solid tumors with PVs in homologous recombination repair genes, regardless of histology. Platinum sensitivity correlated with improved outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"e2500090\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JCO precision oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00090\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO precision oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/PO-25-00090","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶抑制剂在实体肿瘤中的效用,并确定预测敏感性的生物标志物。患者和方法:这项单臂II期研究评估了鲁卡帕尼单药治疗BRCA1、BRCA2、PALB2、RAD51C和RAD51D(队列A)或BARD1、BRIP1、FANCA、NBN和RAD51B(队列B)实体瘤和致癌性变异体(pv)患者的疗效。主要终点是队列a的总缓解率(ORR),次要终点包括疾病控制率(DCR)、无进展生存期(PFS)、总生存期(OS)和安全性。研究了基于疤痕的同源重组缺陷特征(HRDsig)和铂敏感性状态。结果:A组51例,B组12例可评价疗效。队列A的ORR为18% (95% CI, 10 ~ 30)。HRDsig阳性肿瘤的ORR明显高于HRDsig阴性肿瘤(32%;95% CI, 15 ~ 54 v 0%;95% CI, 0 ~ 14;P < 0.01)。在整个研究人群中,DCR为65% (95% CI, 53至76),中位PFS (mPFS)为5.5个月(95% CI, 3.68至7.82),中位OS为12.1个月(95% CI, 10.6至推断)。铂敏感肿瘤的PFS和任何原因死亡风险明显更好(mPFS: 7.8个月vs 3.5个月;P = .02;风险比,0.11 [95% CI, 0.02 ~ 0.55])。肿瘤组织学不能独立预测预后。具有队列A基因pv的肿瘤比具有队列B基因pv的肿瘤更容易出现HRDsig+。对大型商业数据库的分析显示,在BRCA pv的非典型肿瘤中,30.2%为HRDsig+。结论:鲁卡帕尼对HRDsig+实体瘤具有同源重组修复基因pv的活性,无论组织学如何。铂敏感性与预后改善相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
LODESTAR: A Single-Arm Phase II Study of Rucaparib in Solid Tumors With Pathogenic Germline or Somatic Variants in Homologous Recombination Repair Genes.

Purpose: To explore poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor utility across solid tumors and identify biomarkers that predict sensitivity.

Patients and methods: This single-arm phase II study assessed rucaparib monotherapy in patients with solid tumors and pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, and RAD51D (cohort A) or BARD1, BRIP1, FANCA, NBN, and RAD51B (cohort B). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR) in cohort A. Secondary end points included disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. A scar-based homologous recombination deficiency signature (HRDsig) and platinum sensitivity status were explored post hoc.

Results: Fifty-one patients in cohort A and 12 in cohort B were evaluable for efficacy. ORR of cohort A was 18% (95% CI, 10 to 30). A significantly higher ORR was observed with HRDsig+ tumors compared with HRDsig- tumors (32%; 95% CI, 15 to 54 v 0%; 95% CI, 0 to 14; P < .01). In the entire study population, DCR was 65% (95% CI, 53 to 76), median PFS (mPFS) 5.5 months (95% CI, 3.68 to 7.82), and median OS 12.1 months (95% CI, 10.6 to inferred). PFS and hazard of death from any cause was significantly better for platinum-sensitive tumors (mPFS: 7.8 months v 3.5 months; P = .02; hazard ratio, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.55]). Tumor histology was not independently predictive of outcome. Tumors with PVs in cohort A genes were more likely to be HRDsig+ than tumors with PVs in cohort B genes. Analysis of a large commercial database showed that in noncanonical tumors with BRCA PVs, 30.2% were HRDsig+.

Conclusion: Rucaparib has activity in HRDsig+ solid tumors with PVs in homologous recombination repair genes, regardless of histology. Platinum sensitivity correlated with improved outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
363
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信