糖麦德对大上腹部手术患者神经肌肉阻滞逆转的疗效评价。

Q3 Medicine
Hiba Iqbal Ali, Shilpi Misra, Samiksha Parashar, Kriti Nagar, Praveen Kumar Das
{"title":"糖麦德对大上腹部手术患者神经肌肉阻滞逆转的疗效评价。","authors":"Hiba Iqbal Ali, Shilpi Misra, Samiksha Parashar, Kriti Nagar, Praveen Kumar Das","doi":"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_25_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid and complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) allows for the adequate return of respiration and motor function, thereby expediting recovery and preventing micro-aspirations postoperatively. Diaphragmatic ultrasonography (DUS) is an easy, noninvasive and reliable diagnostic tool to quantify and assess respiratory function and exclude any postoperative residual curarization (PORC). Sugammadex, a modified gamma cyclodextrin reverses NMB faster and more reliably from a deep or profound blockade. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Sugammadex for the reversal of NMB in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery and to determine the risk of PORC using DUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present prospective, observational study included patients aged 18-65 years undergoing major upper abdominal surgery. The participants of Group A received Sugammadex and Group B received Neostigmine-Glycopyrrolate as reversal agent. Time of extubation and diaphragmatic thickness was noted at base line, 10 min-30 min postextubation. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) Version 21.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time required to extubate was significantly shorter in Group A as compared to Group B (81.96 ± 37.30 s vs. 204.20 ± 99.91 s, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The diaphragm thickness at 10 min after extubation was higher in Group A compared to Group B (0.42 ± 0.04 cm vs. 0.4 ± 0.04 cm, <i>P</i> = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sugammadex is more effective in achieving rapid reversal of NMB compared to neostigmine. The use of diaphragm ultrasonography provides valuable insights into respiratory function and the risk of PORC postoperatively.</p>","PeriodicalId":13938,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","volume":"15 2","pages":"51-56"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236391/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of efficacy of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.\",\"authors\":\"Hiba Iqbal Ali, Shilpi Misra, Samiksha Parashar, Kriti Nagar, Praveen Kumar Das\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_25_25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Rapid and complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) allows for the adequate return of respiration and motor function, thereby expediting recovery and preventing micro-aspirations postoperatively. Diaphragmatic ultrasonography (DUS) is an easy, noninvasive and reliable diagnostic tool to quantify and assess respiratory function and exclude any postoperative residual curarization (PORC). Sugammadex, a modified gamma cyclodextrin reverses NMB faster and more reliably from a deep or profound blockade. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Sugammadex for the reversal of NMB in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery and to determine the risk of PORC using DUS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The present prospective, observational study included patients aged 18-65 years undergoing major upper abdominal surgery. The participants of Group A received Sugammadex and Group B received Neostigmine-Glycopyrrolate as reversal agent. Time of extubation and diaphragmatic thickness was noted at base line, 10 min-30 min postextubation. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) Version 21.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time required to extubate was significantly shorter in Group A as compared to Group B (81.96 ± 37.30 s vs. 204.20 ± 99.91 s, <i>P</i> < 0.001). The diaphragm thickness at 10 min after extubation was higher in Group A compared to Group B (0.42 ± 0.04 cm vs. 0.4 ± 0.04 cm, <i>P</i> = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Sugammadex is more effective in achieving rapid reversal of NMB compared to neostigmine. The use of diaphragm ultrasonography provides valuable insights into respiratory function and the risk of PORC postoperatively.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"volume\":\"15 2\",\"pages\":\"51-56\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12236391/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_25_25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/23 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijciis.ijciis_25_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

快速和完全逆转神经肌肉阻断(NMB)允许呼吸和运动功能的充分恢复,从而加速恢复和防止术后微抱负。膈超声(DUS)是一种简单、无创、可靠的诊断工具,可量化和评估呼吸功能,并排除任何术后残余curarization (PORC)。Sugammadex是一种改进的γ环糊精,可以更快、更可靠地从深度或深度阻断中逆转NMB。我们的目的是评估Sugammadex对上腹部大手术患者NMB逆转的疗效,并确定使用DUS时发生PORC的风险。方法:本前瞻性观察性研究纳入18-65岁接受上腹部大手术的患者。A组患者使用Sugammadex, B组患者使用新斯的明-甘罗罗酸酯作为逆转剂。拔管后10 min ~ 30 min,在基线记录拔管时间和膈肌厚度。统计分析使用SPSS (statistical Package for The Social Sciences) Version 21.0进行。结果:A组拔管时间(81.96±37.30 s)明显短于B组(204.20±99.91 s, P < 0.001)。拔管后10 min, A组膈膜厚度高于B组(0.42±0.04 cm∶0.4±0.04 cm, P = 0.043)。结论:与新斯的明相比,Sugammadex对NMB的快速逆转更有效。膈超声的使用为术后呼吸功能和PORC的风险提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of efficacy of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.

Evaluation of efficacy of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.

Evaluation of efficacy of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.

Evaluation of efficacy of sugammadex for reversal of neuromuscular blockade in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery.

Introduction: Rapid and complete reversal of neuromuscular blockade (NMB) allows for the adequate return of respiration and motor function, thereby expediting recovery and preventing micro-aspirations postoperatively. Diaphragmatic ultrasonography (DUS) is an easy, noninvasive and reliable diagnostic tool to quantify and assess respiratory function and exclude any postoperative residual curarization (PORC). Sugammadex, a modified gamma cyclodextrin reverses NMB faster and more reliably from a deep or profound blockade. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of Sugammadex for the reversal of NMB in patients undergoing major upper abdominal surgery and to determine the risk of PORC using DUS.

Methods: The present prospective, observational study included patients aged 18-65 years undergoing major upper abdominal surgery. The participants of Group A received Sugammadex and Group B received Neostigmine-Glycopyrrolate as reversal agent. Time of extubation and diaphragmatic thickness was noted at base line, 10 min-30 min postextubation. The statistical analysis was done using SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) Version 21.0.

Results: The time required to extubate was significantly shorter in Group A as compared to Group B (81.96 ± 37.30 s vs. 204.20 ± 99.91 s, P < 0.001). The diaphragm thickness at 10 min after extubation was higher in Group A compared to Group B (0.42 ± 0.04 cm vs. 0.4 ± 0.04 cm, P = 0.043).

Conclusion: Sugammadex is more effective in achieving rapid reversal of NMB compared to neostigmine. The use of diaphragm ultrasonography provides valuable insights into respiratory function and the risk of PORC postoperatively.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: IJCIIS encourages research, education and dissemination of knowledge in the field of Critical Illness and Injury Science across the world thus promoting translational research by striking a synergy between basic science, clinical medicine and public health. The Journal intends to bring together scientists and academicians in the emergency intensive care and promote translational synergy between Laboratory Science, Clinical Medicine and Public Health. The Journal invites Original Articles, Clinical Investigations, Epidemiological Analysis, Data Protocols, Case Reports, Clinical Photographs, review articles and special commentaries. Students, Residents, Academicians, Public Health experts and scientists are all encouraged to be a part of this initiative by contributing, reviewing and promoting scientific works and science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信