Lucas Machado Maracci, Gabriela Salatino Liedke, Rubens Spin-Neto
{"title":"使用CBCT检测退行性颞下颌改变:技术参数,评估标准和校准的范围综述。","authors":"Lucas Machado Maracci, Gabriela Salatino Liedke, Rubens Spin-Neto","doi":"10.1093/dmfr/twaf056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To provide an overview of how Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has been used in the assessment of degenerative changes of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), with emphasis on image acquisition protocols, examiner calibration, and the criteria used for assessing and diagnosing TMJ structures. Searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases on March 5, 2025. In vivo studies with a sample of adult individuals and which used CBCT to evaluate degenerative changes were included. Studies that did not discriminate voxel size, kV, or mA parameters and those without information on the degenerative changes assessed or the criteria used for image evaluation were excluded. Twenty-four studies were included. A wide variation in CBCT acquisition parameters was verified (voxel size varied from 0.076 mm to 0.3 mm, kV values were between 70 and 120, and mA between 3 and 38) which appear not to influence the detection of degenerative changes. The diverse criteria for CBCT assessment employed, many of which not validated, demonstrate a lack of standardization in TMJ assessment across the scientific literature. Furthermore, examiner calibration was not reported by 14 studies. Voxel size does not seem to significantly influence the detection of degenerative changes. The studies show a lack of examiner calibration, as well as inconsistencies in the standardization of acquisition parameters and evaluation protocols for CBCT imaging of the TMJ. Standardized and validated criteria are needed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and comparability among studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":11261,"journal":{"name":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","volume":" ","pages":"517-528"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Detection of degenerative temporomandibular changes using cone beam CT: a scoping review on technical parameters, evaluation criteria, and calibration.\",\"authors\":\"Lucas Machado Maracci, Gabriela Salatino Liedke, Rubens Spin-Neto\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/dmfr/twaf056\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>To provide an overview of how Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has been used in the assessment of degenerative changes of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), with emphasis on image acquisition protocols, examiner calibration, and the criteria used for assessing and diagnosing TMJ structures. Searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases on March 5, 2025. In vivo studies with a sample of adult individuals and which used CBCT to evaluate degenerative changes were included. Studies that did not discriminate voxel size, kV, or mA parameters and those without information on the degenerative changes assessed or the criteria used for image evaluation were excluded. Twenty-four studies were included. A wide variation in CBCT acquisition parameters was verified (voxel size varied from 0.076 mm to 0.3 mm, kV values were between 70 and 120, and mA between 3 and 38) which appear not to influence the detection of degenerative changes. The diverse criteria for CBCT assessment employed, many of which not validated, demonstrate a lack of standardization in TMJ assessment across the scientific literature. Furthermore, examiner calibration was not reported by 14 studies. Voxel size does not seem to significantly influence the detection of degenerative changes. The studies show a lack of examiner calibration, as well as inconsistencies in the standardization of acquisition parameters and evaluation protocols for CBCT imaging of the TMJ. Standardized and validated criteria are needed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and comparability among studies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11261,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"517-528\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dento maxillo facial radiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf056\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dento maxillo facial radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/dmfr/twaf056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:概述CBCT如何用于评估颞下颌关节(TMJ)的退行性改变,重点是图像采集方案,审查员校准以及用于评估和诊断TMJ结构的标准。方法:于2025年3月5日在PubMed、Embase、Scopus和Web of Science数据库中进行检索。包括成人样本的体内研究,并使用CBCT评估退行性变化。没有区分体素大小、kV或mA参数的研究,以及没有评估退行性变化信息或用于图像评估的标准的研究被排除在外。结果:共纳入24项研究。验证了CBCT采集参数的广泛变化(体素大小从0.076 mm到0.3 mm不等,kV值在70到120之间,mA在3到38之间),这些参数似乎不会影响对退行性变化的检测。CBCT评估所采用的各种标准,其中许多未经验证,表明在整个科学文献中TMJ评估缺乏标准化。此外,14项研究未报告审查员校准。结论:低剂量CBCT扫描适合评估颞下颌关节的骨结构。这些研究表明,缺乏审查员校准,以及在TMJ CBCT成像的采集参数和评估方案的标准化方面存在不一致。需要标准化和有效的标准来提高诊断的准确性和研究之间的可比性。
Detection of degenerative temporomandibular changes using cone beam CT: a scoping review on technical parameters, evaluation criteria, and calibration.
To provide an overview of how Cone Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) has been used in the assessment of degenerative changes of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ), with emphasis on image acquisition protocols, examiner calibration, and the criteria used for assessing and diagnosing TMJ structures. Searches were performed on PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science databases on March 5, 2025. In vivo studies with a sample of adult individuals and which used CBCT to evaluate degenerative changes were included. Studies that did not discriminate voxel size, kV, or mA parameters and those without information on the degenerative changes assessed or the criteria used for image evaluation were excluded. Twenty-four studies were included. A wide variation in CBCT acquisition parameters was verified (voxel size varied from 0.076 mm to 0.3 mm, kV values were between 70 and 120, and mA between 3 and 38) which appear not to influence the detection of degenerative changes. The diverse criteria for CBCT assessment employed, many of which not validated, demonstrate a lack of standardization in TMJ assessment across the scientific literature. Furthermore, examiner calibration was not reported by 14 studies. Voxel size does not seem to significantly influence the detection of degenerative changes. The studies show a lack of examiner calibration, as well as inconsistencies in the standardization of acquisition parameters and evaluation protocols for CBCT imaging of the TMJ. Standardized and validated criteria are needed to enhance diagnostic accuracy and comparability among studies.
期刊介绍:
Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (DMFR) is the journal of the International Association of Dentomaxillofacial Radiology (IADMFR) and covers the closely related fields of oral radiology and head and neck imaging.
Established in 1972, DMFR is a key resource keeping dentists, radiologists and clinicians and scientists with an interest in Head and Neck imaging abreast of important research and developments in oral and maxillofacial radiology.
The DMFR editorial board features a panel of international experts including Editor-in-Chief Professor Ralf Schulze. Our editorial board provide their expertise and guidance in shaping the content and direction of the journal.
Quick Facts:
- 2015 Impact Factor - 1.919
- Receipt to first decision - average of 3 weeks
- Acceptance to online publication - average of 3 weeks
- Open access option
- ISSN: 0250-832X
- eISSN: 1476-542X