参与质子治疗临床试验的相关因素:丹麦头颈癌患者的横断面调查。

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Anne Wilhøft Kristensen, Kenneth Jensen, Annesofie L Jensen, Susanne O Dalton, Jesper Eriksen, Jeppe Friborg, Cai Grau
{"title":"参与质子治疗临床试验的相关因素:丹麦头颈癌患者的横断面调查。","authors":"Anne Wilhøft Kristensen, Kenneth Jensen, Annesofie L Jensen, Susanne O Dalton, Jesper Eriksen, Jeppe Friborg, Cai Grau","doi":"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Participation in proton therapy (PT) trials may be affected by structural, clinical, and individual factors, potentially excluding certain patient groups. Such disparities can lead to unequal access to potential research benefits and may limit the generalisability of trial findings. This study aimed to identify factors associated with participation in a Danish randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing proton versus photon radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This national cross-sectional study invited patients with pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, referred for curative-intent radiotherapy at seven Danish radiotherapy clinics between 2022 and 2025, to complete a survey. Respondents were categorised based on enrollment status in a national RCT comparing proton versus photon radiotherapy. Clinical, demographic, psychosocial, and lifestyle data were collected and linked to clinical registry data. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess exposure variables associated with trial participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 304 respondents, 120 (39%) were enrolled in the RCT. Female gender, older age, greater geographical distance to the PT centre, mobility limitations, lower self-rated health status, and lower ability to actively engage with healthcare providers (Health Literacy Questionnaire scale 6) were significantly associated with lower odds of participation. No significant associations were observed for income, education, marital status, or anxiety.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The findings indicate that demographic, geographical, functional, and communication--related factors may limit participation in PT trials. This highlights the need for interventions that enhance the delivery of trial information, strengthen communication between patients and healthcare professionals, and support informed clinical trial decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":7110,"journal":{"name":"Acta Oncologica","volume":"64 ","pages":"879-888"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Factors associated with participation in a proton therapy clinical trial: a cross-sectional survey of Danish patients with head and neck cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Anne Wilhøft Kristensen, Kenneth Jensen, Annesofie L Jensen, Susanne O Dalton, Jesper Eriksen, Jeppe Friborg, Cai Grau\",\"doi\":\"10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>Participation in proton therapy (PT) trials may be affected by structural, clinical, and individual factors, potentially excluding certain patient groups. Such disparities can lead to unequal access to potential research benefits and may limit the generalisability of trial findings. This study aimed to identify factors associated with participation in a Danish randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing proton versus photon radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This national cross-sectional study invited patients with pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, referred for curative-intent radiotherapy at seven Danish radiotherapy clinics between 2022 and 2025, to complete a survey. Respondents were categorised based on enrollment status in a national RCT comparing proton versus photon radiotherapy. Clinical, demographic, psychosocial, and lifestyle data were collected and linked to clinical registry data. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess exposure variables associated with trial participation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 304 respondents, 120 (39%) were enrolled in the RCT. Female gender, older age, greater geographical distance to the PT centre, mobility limitations, lower self-rated health status, and lower ability to actively engage with healthcare providers (Health Literacy Questionnaire scale 6) were significantly associated with lower odds of participation. No significant associations were observed for income, education, marital status, or anxiety.</p><p><strong>Interpretation: </strong>The findings indicate that demographic, geographical, functional, and communication--related factors may limit participation in PT trials. This highlights the need for interventions that enhance the delivery of trial information, strengthen communication between patients and healthcare professionals, and support informed clinical trial decision-making.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7110,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"volume\":\"64 \",\"pages\":\"879-888\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta Oncologica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43912\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Oncologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/1651-226X.2025.43912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景和目的:质子治疗(PT)试验的参与可能受到结构、临床和个体因素的影响,可能会排除某些患者群体。这种差异可能导致获得潜在研究利益的机会不平等,并可能限制试验结果的普遍性。本研究旨在确定参与丹麦随机对照试验(RCT)比较质子与光子放疗治疗头颈癌的相关因素。患者和方法:这项全国性的横断面研究邀请了2022年至2025年间在丹麦7家放疗诊所接受治疗意图放疗的咽喉癌患者完成一项调查。应答者根据在一项比较质子与光子放射治疗的国家随机对照试验中的登记状态进行分类。收集临床、人口学、社会心理和生活方式数据,并将其与临床登记数据联系起来。多重逻辑回归用于评估与试验参与相关的暴露变量。结果:304名应答者中,120名(39%)被纳入RCT。女性性别、年龄较大、距离PT中心较远、行动受限、较低的自评健康状况以及较低的积极参与医疗保健提供者的能力(健康素养问卷量表6)与较低的参与几率显著相关。未观察到收入、教育、婚姻状况或焦虑有显著关联。解释:研究结果表明,人口统计学、地理、功能和通信相关因素可能限制PT试验的参与。这突出了干预措施的必要性,这些干预措施可以增强试验信息的传递,加强患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通,并支持知情的临床试验决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Factors associated with participation in a proton therapy clinical trial: a cross-sectional survey of Danish patients with head and neck cancer.

Background and purpose: Participation in proton therapy (PT) trials may be affected by structural, clinical, and individual factors, potentially excluding certain patient groups. Such disparities can lead to unequal access to potential research benefits and may limit the generalisability of trial findings. This study aimed to identify factors associated with participation in a Danish randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing proton versus photon radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.

Patients and methods: This national cross-sectional study invited patients with pharyngeal and laryngeal cancer, referred for curative-intent radiotherapy at seven Danish radiotherapy clinics between 2022 and 2025, to complete a survey. Respondents were categorised based on enrollment status in a national RCT comparing proton versus photon radiotherapy. Clinical, demographic, psychosocial, and lifestyle data were collected and linked to clinical registry data. Multiple logistic regression was used to assess exposure variables associated with trial participation.

Results: Of 304 respondents, 120 (39%) were enrolled in the RCT. Female gender, older age, greater geographical distance to the PT centre, mobility limitations, lower self-rated health status, and lower ability to actively engage with healthcare providers (Health Literacy Questionnaire scale 6) were significantly associated with lower odds of participation. No significant associations were observed for income, education, marital status, or anxiety.

Interpretation: The findings indicate that demographic, geographical, functional, and communication--related factors may limit participation in PT trials. This highlights the need for interventions that enhance the delivery of trial information, strengthen communication between patients and healthcare professionals, and support informed clinical trial decision-making.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Oncologica
Acta Oncologica 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
301
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Acta Oncologica is a journal for the clinical oncologist and accepts articles within all fields of clinical cancer research. Articles on tumour pathology, experimental oncology, radiobiology, cancer epidemiology and medical radio physics are also welcome, especially if they have a clinical aim or interest. Scientific articles on cancer nursing and psychological or social aspects of cancer are also welcomed. Extensive material may be published as Supplements, for which special conditions apply.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信