食管腺癌在ESOPEC III期试验中的复发模式比较围手术期化疗和术前放化疗。

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Jens Hoeppner,Claudia Schmoor,Thomas Brunner,Peter Bronsert,Patrick Sven Plum,Fabian Nimczewski,Zsolt Madarasz,Florian Lordick
{"title":"食管腺癌在ESOPEC III期试验中的复发模式比较围手术期化疗和术前放化疗。","authors":"Jens Hoeppner,Claudia Schmoor,Thomas Brunner,Peter Bronsert,Patrick Sven Plum,Fabian Nimczewski,Zsolt Madarasz,Florian Lordick","doi":"10.1200/jco-25-00948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The ESOPEC trial showed that perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/docetaxel (FLOT) improved survival in patients with nonmetastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma compared with preoperative chemoradiotherapy with CROSS (41.4Gy/carboplatin/paclitaxel). For this analysis, patients from the ESOPEC trial who underwent tumor resection were eligible. The reported end points here include cause-specific mortality, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and sites of recurrence. Of the 438 patients enrolled in ESOPEC, 192 of 221 (86.9%) FLOT patients and 179 of 217 (82.5%) CROSS patients underwent tumor resection. After a median follow-up of 56 months, 178 experienced disease recurrence (81 FLOT; 97 CROSS) and 28 died without recurrence (12 FLOT; 16 CROSS). The 3-year RFS rate was 54.5% in FLOT patients versus 39.0% in CROSS patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.89]; P = .005). Locoregional recurrence occurred in 39 FLOT versus 32 CROSS patients (3-year cumulative incidences 20.2% v 17.4%, HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.61]; P = .99). Distant recurrence occurred in 64 FLOT versus 89 CROSS patients (3-year cumulative incidences 31.5% v 47.2%, HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.82]; P = .002). Compared with CROSS, perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT improved survival through better systemic tumor control with a reduction in distant tumor recurrences, while locoregional efficacy was similar.","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":"4 1","pages":"JCO2500948"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Recurrence Patterns of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Phase III ESOPEC Trial Comparing Perioperative Chemotherapy With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.\",\"authors\":\"Jens Hoeppner,Claudia Schmoor,Thomas Brunner,Peter Bronsert,Patrick Sven Plum,Fabian Nimczewski,Zsolt Madarasz,Florian Lordick\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/jco-25-00948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The ESOPEC trial showed that perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/docetaxel (FLOT) improved survival in patients with nonmetastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma compared with preoperative chemoradiotherapy with CROSS (41.4Gy/carboplatin/paclitaxel). For this analysis, patients from the ESOPEC trial who underwent tumor resection were eligible. The reported end points here include cause-specific mortality, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and sites of recurrence. Of the 438 patients enrolled in ESOPEC, 192 of 221 (86.9%) FLOT patients and 179 of 217 (82.5%) CROSS patients underwent tumor resection. After a median follow-up of 56 months, 178 experienced disease recurrence (81 FLOT; 97 CROSS) and 28 died without recurrence (12 FLOT; 16 CROSS). The 3-year RFS rate was 54.5% in FLOT patients versus 39.0% in CROSS patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.89]; P = .005). Locoregional recurrence occurred in 39 FLOT versus 32 CROSS patients (3-year cumulative incidences 20.2% v 17.4%, HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.61]; P = .99). Distant recurrence occurred in 64 FLOT versus 89 CROSS patients (3-year cumulative incidences 31.5% v 47.2%, HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.82]; P = .002). Compared with CROSS, perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT improved survival through better systemic tumor control with a reduction in distant tumor recurrences, while locoregional efficacy was similar.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"JCO2500948\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":42.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-00948\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-25-00948","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

ESOPEC试验显示,与术前化疗CROSS (41.4Gy/卡铂/紫杉醇)相比,围手术期化疗氟尿嘧啶(FU)/亚叶酸蛋白/奥沙利铂/多西紫杉醇(FLOT)可改善非转移性食管腺癌患者的生存。在这项分析中,ESOPEC试验中接受肿瘤切除术的患者符合条件。报告的终点包括病因特异性死亡率、无复发生存率(RFS)和复发部位。在ESOPEC纳入的438例患者中,221例FLOT患者中有192例(86.9%)行肿瘤切除术,217例CROSS患者中有179例(82.5%)行肿瘤切除术。中位随访56个月后,178例出现疾病复发(81例FLOT;CROSS 97例,28例无复发死亡(FLOT 12例;16交叉)。FLOT患者的3年RFS率为54.5%,而CROSS患者为39.0%(风险比[HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.51 ~ 0.89];P = .005)。39例FLOT患者出现局部复发,32例CROSS患者出现局部复发(3年累积发病率20.2% vs 17.4%, HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.62 ~ 1.61];P = 0.99)。64例FLOT患者发生远处复发,89例CROSS患者发生远处复发(3年累积发病率31.5% vs 47.2%, HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.43 ~ 0.82];P = .002)。与CROSS相比,FLOT围手术期化疗通过更好的全身肿瘤控制和减少远处肿瘤复发来改善生存,而局部区域疗效相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Recurrence Patterns of Esophageal Adenocarcinoma in the Phase III ESOPEC Trial Comparing Perioperative Chemotherapy With Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy.
The ESOPEC trial showed that perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin/oxaliplatin/docetaxel (FLOT) improved survival in patients with nonmetastatic esophageal adenocarcinoma compared with preoperative chemoradiotherapy with CROSS (41.4Gy/carboplatin/paclitaxel). For this analysis, patients from the ESOPEC trial who underwent tumor resection were eligible. The reported end points here include cause-specific mortality, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and sites of recurrence. Of the 438 patients enrolled in ESOPEC, 192 of 221 (86.9%) FLOT patients and 179 of 217 (82.5%) CROSS patients underwent tumor resection. After a median follow-up of 56 months, 178 experienced disease recurrence (81 FLOT; 97 CROSS) and 28 died without recurrence (12 FLOT; 16 CROSS). The 3-year RFS rate was 54.5% in FLOT patients versus 39.0% in CROSS patients (hazard ratio [HR], 0.67 [95% CI, 0.51 to 0.89]; P = .005). Locoregional recurrence occurred in 39 FLOT versus 32 CROSS patients (3-year cumulative incidences 20.2% v 17.4%, HR, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.62 to 1.61]; P = .99). Distant recurrence occurred in 64 FLOT versus 89 CROSS patients (3-year cumulative incidences 31.5% v 47.2%, HR, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.43 to 0.82]; P = .002). Compared with CROSS, perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT improved survival through better systemic tumor control with a reduction in distant tumor recurrences, while locoregional efficacy was similar.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信