老年心力衰竭患者的初级与心脏病学护理-一项基于登记的研究。

IF 5.2
Eric Chen, Mozhu Ding, Karolina Szummer, Monica Bergqvist, Karin Modig, Katharina Schmidt-Mende
{"title":"老年心力衰竭患者的初级与心脏病学护理-一项基于登记的研究。","authors":"Eric Chen, Mozhu Ding, Karolina Szummer, Monica Bergqvist, Karin Modig, Katharina Schmidt-Mende","doi":"10.3399/BJGP.2025.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b> Adherence to guideline-recommended drug treatment for heart failure (HF) is lower among patients managed in primary care (PC) compared to cardiology care (CC). We need to understand more about the patient group managed in PC only. <b>Aim</b> To compare sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, care use, and drug dispensation, of older HF patients managed exclusively in PC or also in CC. <b>Design and setting</b> Register-based study using real world administrative data from Stockholm, Sweden. <b>Method</b> The study population comprised all individuals aged ≥60 years resident in Stockholm per 31 December 2022 with HF diagnosis. The Total Population Register and several national health registers were linked, providing information on comorbidities, HF hospitalisations, PC visits, and dispensed drugs. Individuals were categorised into managed exclusively in PC or also in CC by the absence/presence of an in/outpatient appointment with a cardiologist during the last five years. <b>Results</b> HF was prevalent in 33,872 (6.5%) individuals of which 50.4% were exclusively managed in PC. Among patients also managed in CC, two thirds of HF drugs were prescribed by PC. PC patients were on average three years older, more often female, of lower socioeconomic status, had fewer comorbidities, received less guideline-recommended drugs, and had lower HF hospitalisations rates than CC patients. Residing in nursing home and having dementia were factors most strongly associated with exclusive PC management. <b>Conclusion</b> PC manages the majority of individuals with HF, who are typically older. These characteristics may explain differences in drug use.</p>","PeriodicalId":520790,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Older heart failure patients in primary versus cardiology care - a register based study.\",\"authors\":\"Eric Chen, Mozhu Ding, Karolina Szummer, Monica Bergqvist, Karin Modig, Katharina Schmidt-Mende\",\"doi\":\"10.3399/BJGP.2025.0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b> Adherence to guideline-recommended drug treatment for heart failure (HF) is lower among patients managed in primary care (PC) compared to cardiology care (CC). We need to understand more about the patient group managed in PC only. <b>Aim</b> To compare sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, care use, and drug dispensation, of older HF patients managed exclusively in PC or also in CC. <b>Design and setting</b> Register-based study using real world administrative data from Stockholm, Sweden. <b>Method</b> The study population comprised all individuals aged ≥60 years resident in Stockholm per 31 December 2022 with HF diagnosis. The Total Population Register and several national health registers were linked, providing information on comorbidities, HF hospitalisations, PC visits, and dispensed drugs. Individuals were categorised into managed exclusively in PC or also in CC by the absence/presence of an in/outpatient appointment with a cardiologist during the last five years. <b>Results</b> HF was prevalent in 33,872 (6.5%) individuals of which 50.4% were exclusively managed in PC. Among patients also managed in CC, two thirds of HF drugs were prescribed by PC. PC patients were on average three years older, more often female, of lower socioeconomic status, had fewer comorbidities, received less guideline-recommended drugs, and had lower HF hospitalisations rates than CC patients. Residing in nursing home and having dementia were factors most strongly associated with exclusive PC management. <b>Conclusion</b> PC manages the majority of individuals with HF, who are typically older. These characteristics may explain differences in drug use.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520790,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2025.0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3399/BJGP.2025.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:与心脏病学护理(CC)相比,初级护理(PC)患者对心力衰竭(HF)指南推荐药物治疗的依从性较低。我们需要更多地了解仅在PC中管理的患者组。目的比较老年心衰患者的社会人口学特征、合并症、护理使用和药物分配。设计和设置基于注册的研究,使用来自瑞典斯德哥尔摩的真实世界管理数据。方法研究人群包括2022年12月31日居住在斯德哥尔摩的所有年龄≥60岁的HF诊断患者。总人口登记册与若干国家健康登记册相联系,提供有关合并症、心衰住院、PC就诊和配药的信息。在过去的五年中,通过与心脏病专家的缺席/门诊预约,个体被分类为专门管理PC或CC。结果HF患者33,872例(6.5%),其中50.4%仅在PC中得到治疗。在同样接受CC治疗的患者中,三分之二的HF药物是由PC处方的。与CC患者相比,PC患者平均年龄大3岁,多为女性,社会经济地位较低,合并症较少,使用指南推荐的药物较少,心衰住院率较低。住在养老院和患有痴呆症是与个人电脑管理最密切相关的因素。结论心衰患者多数采用PC治疗,且以老年人为主。这些特征可以解释药物使用的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Older heart failure patients in primary versus cardiology care - a register based study.

Background Adherence to guideline-recommended drug treatment for heart failure (HF) is lower among patients managed in primary care (PC) compared to cardiology care (CC). We need to understand more about the patient group managed in PC only. Aim To compare sociodemographic characteristics, comorbidities, care use, and drug dispensation, of older HF patients managed exclusively in PC or also in CC. Design and setting Register-based study using real world administrative data from Stockholm, Sweden. Method The study population comprised all individuals aged ≥60 years resident in Stockholm per 31 December 2022 with HF diagnosis. The Total Population Register and several national health registers were linked, providing information on comorbidities, HF hospitalisations, PC visits, and dispensed drugs. Individuals were categorised into managed exclusively in PC or also in CC by the absence/presence of an in/outpatient appointment with a cardiologist during the last five years. Results HF was prevalent in 33,872 (6.5%) individuals of which 50.4% were exclusively managed in PC. Among patients also managed in CC, two thirds of HF drugs were prescribed by PC. PC patients were on average three years older, more often female, of lower socioeconomic status, had fewer comorbidities, received less guideline-recommended drugs, and had lower HF hospitalisations rates than CC patients. Residing in nursing home and having dementia were factors most strongly associated with exclusive PC management. Conclusion PC manages the majority of individuals with HF, who are typically older. These characteristics may explain differences in drug use.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信