非手术室麻醉镇静技术的考虑:叙述回顾和更新。

IF 2.1
Current opinion in anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001541
Alan D Kaye, Brianna N Rogers, Camila Y Carrera, Richard D Urman, Saajid Azhar, Sahar Shekoohi
{"title":"非手术室麻醉镇静技术的考虑:叙述回顾和更新。","authors":"Alan D Kaye, Brianna N Rogers, Camila Y Carrera, Richard D Urman, Saajid Azhar, Sahar Shekoohi","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001541","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Sedation techniques for nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) are vital for ensuring patient comfort and cooperation during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures outside traditional operating rooms. The increasing prevalence of these procedures in diverse settings necessitates adapting sedation practices to unique challenges in monitoring, equipment availability, and emergency preparedness.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The choice of sedation technique depends on the procedure, patient health status, and the nonsurgical environment's resources. Common techniques include moderate sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia. Agents like propofol, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and midazolam are frequently used due to their rapid onset, short half-lives, and predictable three pharmacokinetics. Balanced sedation techniques combining agents help minimize side effects while achieving desired sedation levels.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>To maintain safety and efficacy, NORA practices must adhere to the same high standards as operating rooms, including sedation protocols and American Society of Anesthesiologists standard monitoring. Portable monitoring systems and robust emergency preparedness are essential in these settings. As NORA cases rise, the development of tailored sedation protocols and refinement of safety standards are crucial to enhancing patient outcomes in diverse procedural environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":"38 4","pages":"435-442"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sedation technique considerations for nonoperating room anesthesia: a narrative review and update.\",\"authors\":\"Alan D Kaye, Brianna N Rogers, Camila Y Carrera, Richard D Urman, Saajid Azhar, Sahar Shekoohi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001541\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Sedation techniques for nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) are vital for ensuring patient comfort and cooperation during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures outside traditional operating rooms. The increasing prevalence of these procedures in diverse settings necessitates adapting sedation practices to unique challenges in monitoring, equipment availability, and emergency preparedness.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>The choice of sedation technique depends on the procedure, patient health status, and the nonsurgical environment's resources. Common techniques include moderate sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia. Agents like propofol, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and midazolam are frequently used due to their rapid onset, short half-lives, and predictable three pharmacokinetics. Balanced sedation techniques combining agents help minimize side effects while achieving desired sedation levels.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>To maintain safety and efficacy, NORA practices must adhere to the same high standards as operating rooms, including sedation protocols and American Society of Anesthesiologists standard monitoring. Portable monitoring systems and robust emergency preparedness are essential in these settings. As NORA cases rise, the development of tailored sedation protocols and refinement of safety standards are crucial to enhancing patient outcomes in diverse procedural environments.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"435-442\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001541\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001541","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:在传统手术室外的诊断和治疗过程中,镇静技术对于确保患者的舒适和合作至关重要。这些程序在不同环境中越来越普遍,需要调整镇静实践以适应监测,设备可用性和应急准备方面的独特挑战。最新发现:镇静技术的选择取决于手术、患者健康状况和非手术环境的资源。常用的技术包括中度镇静、深度镇静和全身麻醉。异丙酚、右美托咪定、芬太尼和咪达唑仑等药物由于起效快、半衰期短和可预测的三种药代动力学而经常被使用。平衡镇静技术结合药剂有助于减少副作用,同时达到所需的镇静水平。摘要:为了保持安全性和有效性,NORA的操作必须遵循与手术室相同的高标准,包括镇静协议和美国麻醉医师协会的标准监测。在这些情况下,便携式监测系统和强有力的应急准备是必不可少的。随着NORA病例的增加,制定量身定制的镇静方案和完善安全标准对于提高患者在不同手术环境中的预后至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Sedation technique considerations for nonoperating room anesthesia: a narrative review and update.

Purpose of review: Sedation techniques for nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) are vital for ensuring patient comfort and cooperation during diagnostic and therapeutic procedures outside traditional operating rooms. The increasing prevalence of these procedures in diverse settings necessitates adapting sedation practices to unique challenges in monitoring, equipment availability, and emergency preparedness.

Recent findings: The choice of sedation technique depends on the procedure, patient health status, and the nonsurgical environment's resources. Common techniques include moderate sedation, deep sedation, and general anesthesia. Agents like propofol, dexmedetomidine, fentanyl, and midazolam are frequently used due to their rapid onset, short half-lives, and predictable three pharmacokinetics. Balanced sedation techniques combining agents help minimize side effects while achieving desired sedation levels.

Summary: To maintain safety and efficacy, NORA practices must adhere to the same high standards as operating rooms, including sedation protocols and American Society of Anesthesiologists standard monitoring. Portable monitoring systems and robust emergency preparedness are essential in these settings. As NORA cases rise, the development of tailored sedation protocols and refinement of safety standards are crucial to enhancing patient outcomes in diverse procedural environments.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信