非手术室麻醉的安全性:一个叙述性的回顾。

IF 2.1
Current opinion in anaesthesiology Pub Date : 2025-08-01 Epub Date: 2025-06-24 DOI:10.1097/ACO.0000000000001542
Alan D Kaye, Brianna N Rogers, Sydney Mashaw, Chizoba N Mosieri, Richard D Urman, Sahar Shekoohi
{"title":"非手术室麻醉的安全性:一个叙述性的回顾。","authors":"Alan D Kaye, Brianna N Rogers, Sydney Mashaw, Chizoba N Mosieri, Richard D Urman, Sahar Shekoohi","doi":"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) has become increasingly relevant as diagnostic and therapeutic procedures move beyond traditional surgical settings. This shift introduces unique safety challenges, making it crucial to evaluate how NORA can maintain patient safety and procedural efficiency despite the lack of standardized environments and resources typical of operating rooms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Studies reveal that NORA often involves patients with complex comorbidities, requiring meticulous risk assessment and preparation. Common challenges include limited equipment availability, difficulties in patient monitoring, and restricted access to emergency support. Portable 3 monitoring devices, streamlined sedation techniques, and advancements in anesthesia technology have contributed to improved safety. However, these advancements underscore the importance of adhering to protocols tailored to the unique needs of each procedural setting.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Addressing NORA's safety challenges requires rigorous preoperative evaluation, adherence to high monitoring standards, and effective communication between anesthesia teams and procedural staff. Further research and standardized guidelines are essential to optimize patient outcomes, minimize risks, and ensure the safe delivery of anesthesia in nontraditional settings. These measures will support the continued evolution and success of NORA in modern healthcare.</p>","PeriodicalId":520600,"journal":{"name":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","volume":"38 4","pages":"425-434"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety of nonoperating room anesthesia: a narrative review.\",\"authors\":\"Alan D Kaye, Brianna N Rogers, Sydney Mashaw, Chizoba N Mosieri, Richard D Urman, Sahar Shekoohi\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ACO.0000000000001542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) has become increasingly relevant as diagnostic and therapeutic procedures move beyond traditional surgical settings. This shift introduces unique safety challenges, making it crucial to evaluate how NORA can maintain patient safety and procedural efficiency despite the lack of standardized environments and resources typical of operating rooms.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Studies reveal that NORA often involves patients with complex comorbidities, requiring meticulous risk assessment and preparation. Common challenges include limited equipment availability, difficulties in patient monitoring, and restricted access to emergency support. Portable 3 monitoring devices, streamlined sedation techniques, and advancements in anesthesia technology have contributed to improved safety. However, these advancements underscore the importance of adhering to protocols tailored to the unique needs of each procedural setting.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Addressing NORA's safety challenges requires rigorous preoperative evaluation, adherence to high monitoring standards, and effective communication between anesthesia teams and procedural staff. Further research and standardized guidelines are essential to optimize patient outcomes, minimize risks, and ensure the safe delivery of anesthesia in nontraditional settings. These measures will support the continued evolution and success of NORA in modern healthcare.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520600,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Current opinion in anaesthesiology\",\"volume\":\"38 4\",\"pages\":\"425-434\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Current opinion in anaesthesiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/24 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current opinion in anaesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACO.0000000000001542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

综述目的:随着诊断和治疗程序超越传统的外科环境,非手术室麻醉(NORA)变得越来越重要。这种转变带来了独特的安全挑战,使得评估NORA如何在缺乏标准化环境和手术室典型资源的情况下保持患者安全和程序效率变得至关重要。近期发现:研究表明,NORA常涉及有复杂合并症的患者,需要细致的风险评估和准备。常见的挑战包括设备供应有限、患者监测困难以及获得紧急支持的机会受限。便携式监测设备、简化的镇静技术和麻醉技术的进步都有助于提高安全性。然而,这些进步强调了遵守针对每种程序设置的独特需求量身定制的协议的重要性。总结:应对NORA的安全挑战需要严格的术前评估,坚持高监测标准,以及麻醉小组和手术人员之间的有效沟通。进一步的研究和标准化的指导方针对于优化患者的预后、最大限度地降低风险和确保在非传统环境下麻醉的安全交付至关重要。这些措施将支持NORA在现代医疗保健中的持续发展和成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safety of nonoperating room anesthesia: a narrative review.

Purpose of review: Nonoperating room anesthesia (NORA) has become increasingly relevant as diagnostic and therapeutic procedures move beyond traditional surgical settings. This shift introduces unique safety challenges, making it crucial to evaluate how NORA can maintain patient safety and procedural efficiency despite the lack of standardized environments and resources typical of operating rooms.

Recent findings: Studies reveal that NORA often involves patients with complex comorbidities, requiring meticulous risk assessment and preparation. Common challenges include limited equipment availability, difficulties in patient monitoring, and restricted access to emergency support. Portable 3 monitoring devices, streamlined sedation techniques, and advancements in anesthesia technology have contributed to improved safety. However, these advancements underscore the importance of adhering to protocols tailored to the unique needs of each procedural setting.

Summary: Addressing NORA's safety challenges requires rigorous preoperative evaluation, adherence to high monitoring standards, and effective communication between anesthesia teams and procedural staff. Further research and standardized guidelines are essential to optimize patient outcomes, minimize risks, and ensure the safe delivery of anesthesia in nontraditional settings. These measures will support the continued evolution and success of NORA in modern healthcare.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信