测量医院护理弹性:系统的文献综述。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Marina Cavalieri, Stefania Fontana, Calogero Guccio, Domenico Lisi, Marco Ferdinando Martorana, Giacomo Pignataro, Domenica Romeo
{"title":"测量医院护理弹性:系统的文献综述。","authors":"Marina Cavalieri, Stefania Fontana, Calogero Guccio, Domenico Lisi, Marco Ferdinando Martorana, Giacomo Pignataro, Domenica Romeo","doi":"10.1007/s10198-025-01807-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The recent Covid-19 pandemic has shown how even high-performing healthcare systems are often unprepared to cope with sudden and unforeseen surges in demand for healthcare services, drawing further attention on crucial factors ensuring their resilience in the face of extreme disruptive events. Despite extensive efforts to define health system resilience, a lack of consensus persists, making it difficult to operationalize the existing conceptual frameworks and to guide policy makers in developing adequate response strategies. Grounded on this, the present paper aims to systematically review how hospital resilience has been measured in high-income countries. Particularly, we intend to map out the different indicators and metrics used to quantitatively assess the hospitals' capacity to proactively face sudden health shocks, which can put clinical activity under pressure and at risk of disruption. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted until March 2023, by combining three databases. The review identified 1,261 studies of which 45 studies met the eligibility criteria. We found a wide range of methodological approaches that shared a narrow focus on single aspects of hospital resilience, without being able to measure it comprehensively and systematically and without accounting for its dynamic and feedback loop nature. Specifically, most of the studies looked at how to measure hospitals' capacity to absorb the shock and adapt to it, while almost neglecting their transformative capacity as well as the legacy or enduring impact of shocks.</p>","PeriodicalId":51416,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Health Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Measuring hospital care resilience: a systematic literature review.\",\"authors\":\"Marina Cavalieri, Stefania Fontana, Calogero Guccio, Domenico Lisi, Marco Ferdinando Martorana, Giacomo Pignataro, Domenica Romeo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10198-025-01807-1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The recent Covid-19 pandemic has shown how even high-performing healthcare systems are often unprepared to cope with sudden and unforeseen surges in demand for healthcare services, drawing further attention on crucial factors ensuring their resilience in the face of extreme disruptive events. Despite extensive efforts to define health system resilience, a lack of consensus persists, making it difficult to operationalize the existing conceptual frameworks and to guide policy makers in developing adequate response strategies. Grounded on this, the present paper aims to systematically review how hospital resilience has been measured in high-income countries. Particularly, we intend to map out the different indicators and metrics used to quantitatively assess the hospitals' capacity to proactively face sudden health shocks, which can put clinical activity under pressure and at risk of disruption. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted until March 2023, by combining three databases. The review identified 1,261 studies of which 45 studies met the eligibility criteria. We found a wide range of methodological approaches that shared a narrow focus on single aspects of hospital resilience, without being able to measure it comprehensively and systematically and without accounting for its dynamic and feedback loop nature. Specifically, most of the studies looked at how to measure hospitals' capacity to absorb the shock and adapt to it, while almost neglecting their transformative capacity as well as the legacy or enduring impact of shocks.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Health Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01807-1\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Health Economics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-025-01807-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最近的2019冠状病毒病大流行表明,即使是表现良好的医疗保健系统也往往没有准备好应对医疗服务需求的突然和不可预见的激增,这促使人们进一步关注确保其在面对极端破坏性事件时具有复原力的关键因素。尽管为确定卫生系统的复原力作出了广泛的努力,但仍然缺乏共识,因此难以实施现有的概念框架并指导决策者制定适当的应对战略。基于此,本文旨在系统地回顾如何在高收入国家测量医院的恢复力。特别是,我们打算制定用于定量评估医院主动应对突发健康冲击的能力的不同指标和指标,突发健康冲击可能使临床活动面临压力和中断的风险。遵循PRISMA指南,结合三个数据库进行了系统的文献检索,直至2023年3月。该综述确定了1261项研究,其中45项研究符合入选标准。我们发现了广泛的方法方法,这些方法都只关注医院恢复力的单个方面,无法全面系统地测量它,也没有考虑到它的动态和反馈循环性质。具体来说,大多数研究着眼于如何衡量医院吸收冲击和适应冲击的能力,而几乎忽视了医院的变革能力以及冲击的遗留问题或持久影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Measuring hospital care resilience: a systematic literature review.

The recent Covid-19 pandemic has shown how even high-performing healthcare systems are often unprepared to cope with sudden and unforeseen surges in demand for healthcare services, drawing further attention on crucial factors ensuring their resilience in the face of extreme disruptive events. Despite extensive efforts to define health system resilience, a lack of consensus persists, making it difficult to operationalize the existing conceptual frameworks and to guide policy makers in developing adequate response strategies. Grounded on this, the present paper aims to systematically review how hospital resilience has been measured in high-income countries. Particularly, we intend to map out the different indicators and metrics used to quantitatively assess the hospitals' capacity to proactively face sudden health shocks, which can put clinical activity under pressure and at risk of disruption. Adhering to PRISMA guidelines, a systematic literature search was conducted until March 2023, by combining three databases. The review identified 1,261 studies of which 45 studies met the eligibility criteria. We found a wide range of methodological approaches that shared a narrow focus on single aspects of hospital resilience, without being able to measure it comprehensively and systematically and without accounting for its dynamic and feedback loop nature. Specifically, most of the studies looked at how to measure hospitals' capacity to absorb the shock and adapt to it, while almost neglecting their transformative capacity as well as the legacy or enduring impact of shocks.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
2.30%
发文量
131
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Health Economics is a journal of Health Economics and associated disciplines. The growing demand for health economics and the introduction of new guidelines in various European countries were the motivation to generate a highly scientific and at the same time practice oriented journal considering the requirements of various health care systems in Europe. The international scientific board of opinion leaders guarantees high-quality, peer-reviewed publications as well as articles for pragmatic approaches in the field of health economics. We intend to cover all aspects of health economics: • Basics of health economic approaches and methods • Pharmacoeconomics • Health Care Systems • Pricing and Reimbursement Systems • Quality-of-Life-Studies The editors reserve the right to reject manuscripts that do not comply with the above-mentioned requirements. The author will be held responsible for false statements or for failure to fulfill the above-mentioned requirements. Officially cited as: Eur J Health Econ
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信