可吸收多糖粉末在心脏手术中的止血作用:一项比较研究。

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2025-07-03 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S509115
Sarah E Schroeder, Robert Oakes, Ryan Shelstad, Richard Thompson
{"title":"可吸收多糖粉末在心脏手术中的止血作用:一项比较研究。","authors":"Sarah E Schroeder, Robert Oakes, Ryan Shelstad, Richard Thompson","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S509115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Redo cardiac surgery outcomes, including increased transfusions and risk of reoperation, worsen with post-operative bleeding. This study aimed to directly compare the use of an absorbable polysaccharide powder to no hemostatic agent use during planned non-emergent redo cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one participants in two cohorts underwent planned non-emergent redo cardiac surgery. The retrospective cohort (n = 26) was chosen from redo cardiac surgeries completed between 2019 and 2020, while the prospective cohort (n = 25) included sequential redo cardiac surgeries with the use of an absorbable polysaccharide powder. Patient operative characteristics, along with first 24-hour transfusion use (packed red blood cells (pRBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets (Plts), chest tube outputs (CTO) at 12, 24 and 48 hours, and reoperation rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a higher non-statistical average of intraoperative pRBC and FFP rates in the retrospective cohort, compared to cases where absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (2 ± 2.9 vs 1.1 ± 1.4 units pRBC, p = 0.414; and 1.4 ± 1.8 vs 0.6 ± 1 units FFP, p = 0.070) while there were statistical differences in Plts use in the retrospective cohort compared to when absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (1 ± 1.3 vs 0.4 ± 0.7 units plts, p = 0.028). Statistically significant lower amounts of CTO in the first 12 hours and the 12-24-hour intervals were found when absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (817 ± 520 vs 558 ± 352 milliliters, p = 0.028; and 1144 ± 704 vs 830 ± 474 milliliters, p = 0.044, respectively). There were three reoperations in the retrospective cohort due to suspected bleeding, compared to no reoperations in the absorbable polysaccharide powder cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights fewer transfusions, lower CTO, and decreased need for reoperation when using absorbable polysaccharide powder in redo cardiac surgeries. Further randomized trials are needed to more accurately define benefits of absorbable polysaccharide powder in redo cardiac surgeries. Word count: 302.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"377-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235016/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hemostatic Benefits of an Absorbable Polysaccharide Powder in Redo Cardiac Surgery: A Comparative Study.\",\"authors\":\"Sarah E Schroeder, Robert Oakes, Ryan Shelstad, Richard Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/MDER.S509115\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Redo cardiac surgery outcomes, including increased transfusions and risk of reoperation, worsen with post-operative bleeding. This study aimed to directly compare the use of an absorbable polysaccharide powder to no hemostatic agent use during planned non-emergent redo cardiac surgery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fifty-one participants in two cohorts underwent planned non-emergent redo cardiac surgery. The retrospective cohort (n = 26) was chosen from redo cardiac surgeries completed between 2019 and 2020, while the prospective cohort (n = 25) included sequential redo cardiac surgeries with the use of an absorbable polysaccharide powder. Patient operative characteristics, along with first 24-hour transfusion use (packed red blood cells (pRBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets (Plts), chest tube outputs (CTO) at 12, 24 and 48 hours, and reoperation rates were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There was a higher non-statistical average of intraoperative pRBC and FFP rates in the retrospective cohort, compared to cases where absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (2 ± 2.9 vs 1.1 ± 1.4 units pRBC, p = 0.414; and 1.4 ± 1.8 vs 0.6 ± 1 units FFP, p = 0.070) while there were statistical differences in Plts use in the retrospective cohort compared to when absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (1 ± 1.3 vs 0.4 ± 0.7 units plts, p = 0.028). Statistically significant lower amounts of CTO in the first 12 hours and the 12-24-hour intervals were found when absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (817 ± 520 vs 558 ± 352 milliliters, p = 0.028; and 1144 ± 704 vs 830 ± 474 milliliters, p = 0.044, respectively). There were three reoperations in the retrospective cohort due to suspected bleeding, compared to no reoperations in the absorbable polysaccharide powder cohort.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study highlights fewer transfusions, lower CTO, and decreased need for reoperation when using absorbable polysaccharide powder in redo cardiac surgeries. Further randomized trials are needed to more accurately define benefits of absorbable polysaccharide powder in redo cardiac surgeries. Word count: 302.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"377-386\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12235016/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S509115\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S509115","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:重做心脏手术的结果,包括输血量增加和再次手术的风险,随着术后出血而恶化。本研究旨在直接比较在计划的非紧急重做心脏手术中使用可吸收多糖粉末和不使用止血剂的效果。方法:两组51名参与者接受了计划中的非紧急心脏手术。回顾性队列(n = 26)选择于2019年至2020年间完成的重做心脏手术,而前瞻性队列(n = 25)包括使用可吸收多糖粉末的顺序重做心脏手术。比较患者的手术特征,以及第一次24小时输血使用情况(红细胞(pRBC)、新鲜冷冻血浆(FFP)和血小板(Plts), 12、24和48小时胸管输出量(CTO)和再手术率。结果:回顾性队列中术中pRBC和FFP率的非统计平均值高于可吸收多糖粉组(2±2.9 vs 1.1±1.4单位pRBC, p = 0.414;1.4±1.8 vs 0.6±1单位FFP, p = 0.070),而在回顾性队列中,使用Plts与使用可吸收多糖粉相比有统计学差异(1±1.3 vs 0.4±0.7单位plp, p = 0.028)。使用可吸收多糖粉末时,前12小时和12-24小时间隔的CTO含量显著降低(817±520 vs 558±352 ml, p = 0.028;1144±704 vs 830±474毫升,p = 0.044)。回顾性队列中有3例因怀疑出血而再次手术,而可吸收多糖粉队列中没有再次手术。结论:本研究强调在心脏重手术中使用可吸收多糖粉可减少输血量,降低CTO,减少再手术需求。需要进一步的随机试验来更准确地确定可吸收多糖粉在心脏手术中的益处。字数:302。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Hemostatic Benefits of an Absorbable Polysaccharide Powder in Redo Cardiac Surgery: A Comparative Study.

Background: Redo cardiac surgery outcomes, including increased transfusions and risk of reoperation, worsen with post-operative bleeding. This study aimed to directly compare the use of an absorbable polysaccharide powder to no hemostatic agent use during planned non-emergent redo cardiac surgery.

Methods: Fifty-one participants in two cohorts underwent planned non-emergent redo cardiac surgery. The retrospective cohort (n = 26) was chosen from redo cardiac surgeries completed between 2019 and 2020, while the prospective cohort (n = 25) included sequential redo cardiac surgeries with the use of an absorbable polysaccharide powder. Patient operative characteristics, along with first 24-hour transfusion use (packed red blood cells (pRBC), fresh frozen plasma (FFP) and platelets (Plts), chest tube outputs (CTO) at 12, 24 and 48 hours, and reoperation rates were compared.

Results: There was a higher non-statistical average of intraoperative pRBC and FFP rates in the retrospective cohort, compared to cases where absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (2 ± 2.9 vs 1.1 ± 1.4 units pRBC, p = 0.414; and 1.4 ± 1.8 vs 0.6 ± 1 units FFP, p = 0.070) while there were statistical differences in Plts use in the retrospective cohort compared to when absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (1 ± 1.3 vs 0.4 ± 0.7 units plts, p = 0.028). Statistically significant lower amounts of CTO in the first 12 hours and the 12-24-hour intervals were found when absorbable polysaccharide powder was used (817 ± 520 vs 558 ± 352 milliliters, p = 0.028; and 1144 ± 704 vs 830 ± 474 milliliters, p = 0.044, respectively). There were three reoperations in the retrospective cohort due to suspected bleeding, compared to no reoperations in the absorbable polysaccharide powder cohort.

Conclusion: This study highlights fewer transfusions, lower CTO, and decreased need for reoperation when using absorbable polysaccharide powder in redo cardiac surgeries. Further randomized trials are needed to more accurately define benefits of absorbable polysaccharide powder in redo cardiac surgeries. Word count: 302.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信