遗传学服务在俄亥俄州新生儿听力损失诊断中的应用。

IF 1.8 Q4 GENETICS & HEREDITY
Journal of Community Genetics Pub Date : 2025-10-01 Epub Date: 2025-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s12687-025-00816-0
Cara L Barnett, Prashant Malhotra, Allyson VanHorn, Boriana Zaharieva, John Myers, William J Riggs, Elizabeth Jordan
{"title":"遗传学服务在俄亥俄州新生儿听力损失诊断中的应用。","authors":"Cara L Barnett, Prashant Malhotra, Allyson VanHorn, Boriana Zaharieva, John Myers, William J Riggs, Elizabeth Jordan","doi":"10.1007/s12687-025-00816-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 50-60% of confirmed congenital hearing loss (HL) diagnoses, the etiology is genetic. The importance of a genetic evaluation for HL is recognized by several national organizations in the United States. This study aimed to evaluate provider practice patterns, beliefs, and knowledge of the role of genetics in the medical diagnosis of HL and assess parent experience and knowledge regarding the role of genetics in the diagnostic process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two surveys were designed using published guidance on optimal care of newborns with HL. Participants included providers (otolaryngologists (ENT) and audiologists) and parents of a newborn with confirmed HL in the state of Ohio from 2017 to 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 providers (14 ENT; 81 audiologist) and 39 parent responses were included in the analysis. Only 51% of providers refer for a genetics evaluation (n = 49), and less than 10% order genetic testing (n = 9). However, 96% of providers believe families should be presented with the opportunity to pursue a genetics evaluation. In this study, only 46% (n = 18) of parents reported that they were referred to genetics, and 36% (n = 14) reported that their child had genetic testing for HL. For parentss whose child did not have a genetic evaluation, 53% (n = 17/32) were very likely or likely, 25% (n = 8/32) were unsure, and 22% (n = 7/32) were very unlikely or unlikely to pursue an evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is inconsistent implementation of guideline directed care for genetic services for HL. As opportunities for gene therapies for HL advance, there is a need to expand access to genetic evaluation for HL.</p>","PeriodicalId":46965,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Community Genetics","volume":" ","pages":"603-613"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401789/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Utilization of genetics services in the diagnosis of hearing loss in newborns in the state of Ohio.\",\"authors\":\"Cara L Barnett, Prashant Malhotra, Allyson VanHorn, Boriana Zaharieva, John Myers, William J Riggs, Elizabeth Jordan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12687-025-00816-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In 50-60% of confirmed congenital hearing loss (HL) diagnoses, the etiology is genetic. The importance of a genetic evaluation for HL is recognized by several national organizations in the United States. This study aimed to evaluate provider practice patterns, beliefs, and knowledge of the role of genetics in the medical diagnosis of HL and assess parent experience and knowledge regarding the role of genetics in the diagnostic process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two surveys were designed using published guidance on optimal care of newborns with HL. Participants included providers (otolaryngologists (ENT) and audiologists) and parents of a newborn with confirmed HL in the state of Ohio from 2017 to 2018.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>95 providers (14 ENT; 81 audiologist) and 39 parent responses were included in the analysis. Only 51% of providers refer for a genetics evaluation (n = 49), and less than 10% order genetic testing (n = 9). However, 96% of providers believe families should be presented with the opportunity to pursue a genetics evaluation. In this study, only 46% (n = 18) of parents reported that they were referred to genetics, and 36% (n = 14) reported that their child had genetic testing for HL. For parentss whose child did not have a genetic evaluation, 53% (n = 17/32) were very likely or likely, 25% (n = 8/32) were unsure, and 22% (n = 7/32) were very unlikely or unlikely to pursue an evaluation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is inconsistent implementation of guideline directed care for genetic services for HL. As opportunities for gene therapies for HL advance, there is a need to expand access to genetic evaluation for HL.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Community Genetics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"603-613\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12401789/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Community Genetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-025-00816-0\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/9 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"GENETICS & HEREDITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Community Genetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12687-025-00816-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GENETICS & HEREDITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在50-60%确诊的先天性听力损失(HL)诊断中,病因是遗传的。遗传评估对HL的重要性得到了美国几个国家组织的认可。本研究旨在评估提供者的实践模式、信念和遗传学在HL医学诊断中的作用的知识,并评估父母关于遗传学在诊断过程中作用的经验和知识。方法:采用已出版的新生儿HL最佳护理指南设计两项调查。参与者包括2017年至2018年俄亥俄州确认患有HL的新生儿的提供者(耳鼻喉科医生(ENT)和听力学家)和父母。结果:95名提供者(耳鼻喉科14名;81名听力学家)和39名家长的回复被纳入分析。只有51%的医疗服务提供者要求进行基因评估(n = 49),不到10%的人要求进行基因检测(n = 9)。然而,96%的提供者认为家庭应该有机会进行遗传评估。在这项研究中,只有46% (n = 18)的父母报告他们被转到遗传学,36% (n = 14)的父母报告他们的孩子进行了HL基因检测。对于孩子没有进行遗传评估的父母,53% (n = 17/32)非常可能或可能,25% (n = 8/32)不确定,22% (n = 7/32)非常不可能或不太可能进行评估。结论:在HL遗传服务的指导照护中存在不一致的执行情况。随着HL基因治疗机会的增加,有必要扩大HL基因评估的途径。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Utilization of genetics services in the diagnosis of hearing loss in newborns in the state of Ohio.

Introduction: In 50-60% of confirmed congenital hearing loss (HL) diagnoses, the etiology is genetic. The importance of a genetic evaluation for HL is recognized by several national organizations in the United States. This study aimed to evaluate provider practice patterns, beliefs, and knowledge of the role of genetics in the medical diagnosis of HL and assess parent experience and knowledge regarding the role of genetics in the diagnostic process.

Methods: Two surveys were designed using published guidance on optimal care of newborns with HL. Participants included providers (otolaryngologists (ENT) and audiologists) and parents of a newborn with confirmed HL in the state of Ohio from 2017 to 2018.

Results: 95 providers (14 ENT; 81 audiologist) and 39 parent responses were included in the analysis. Only 51% of providers refer for a genetics evaluation (n = 49), and less than 10% order genetic testing (n = 9). However, 96% of providers believe families should be presented with the opportunity to pursue a genetics evaluation. In this study, only 46% (n = 18) of parents reported that they were referred to genetics, and 36% (n = 14) reported that their child had genetic testing for HL. For parentss whose child did not have a genetic evaluation, 53% (n = 17/32) were very likely or likely, 25% (n = 8/32) were unsure, and 22% (n = 7/32) were very unlikely or unlikely to pursue an evaluation.

Conclusion: There is inconsistent implementation of guideline directed care for genetic services for HL. As opportunities for gene therapies for HL advance, there is a need to expand access to genetic evaluation for HL.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Community Genetics
Journal of Community Genetics GENETICS & HEREDITY-
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: The Journal of Community Genetics is an international forum for research in the ever-expanding field of community genetics, the art and science of applying medical genetics to human communities for the benefit of their individuals. Community genetics comprises all activities which identify persons at increased genetic risk and has an interest in assessing this risk, in order to enable those at risk to make informed decisions. Community genetics services thus encompass such activities as genetic screening, registration of genetic conditions in the population, routine preconceptional and prenatal genetic consultations, public education on genetic issues, and public debate on related ethical issues. The Journal of Community Genetics has a multidisciplinary scope. It covers medical genetics, epidemiology, genetics in primary care, public health aspects of genetics, and ethical, legal, social and economic issues. Its intention is to serve as a forum for community genetics worldwide, with a focus on low- and middle-income countries. The journal features original research papers, reviews, short communications, program reports, news, and correspondence. Program reports describe illustrative projects in the field of community genetics, e.g., design and progress of an educational program or the protocol and achievement of a gene bank. Case reports describing individual patients are not accepted.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信