左室血栓患者抗凝疗效亚组的鉴定。

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine Pub Date : 2025-06-26 eCollection Date: 2025-06-01 DOI:10.31083/RCM27179
Zechen Liu, Boqun Shi, Rui Zhang, Kefei Dou, Weihua Song
{"title":"左室血栓患者抗凝疗效亚组的鉴定。","authors":"Zechen Liu, Boqun Shi, Rui Zhang, Kefei Dou, Weihua Song","doi":"10.31083/RCM27179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is associated with major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Anticoagulation represents the current primary management for LVT; however, current studies in some Asian populations suggest that the anticoagulation benefit in LVT patients is not significant. Given the heterogeneity of clinical phenotypes in LVT patients, the population of LVT patients who benefit from anticoagulation needs to be further explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients diagnosed with LVT at the FuWai Hospital from 2009 to 2021. We performed a latent class analysis (LCA) based on important clinical characteristics to objectively determine the number and dimensionality of clusters. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox analysis were used to explore the relationship between anticoagulation therapy and MACCEs and major bleeding events in LVT patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1085 patients were enrolled in this study, and during a median follow-up time of 36.5 months, 206 patients developed MACCEs, while 16 patients developed major bleeding events. Moreover, 1085 patients were categorized into four clusters following the LCA. In the adjusted model, the risk of MACCEs was significantly lower in LVT patients receiving anticoagulation in cluster 4 (hazard ratio (HR): 0.486, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.243-0.971) than in the group not receiving anticoagulation; however, there were no differences in the other three clusters or the whole population. There was a significant interaction between anticoagulation and the clustered subgroups (<i>p</i> for interaction in MACCEs: 0.046). However, no significant correlation was found for major bleeding events across clusters or for anticoagulant therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that not all LVT patients benefit from anticoagulation therapy; younger LVT patients with fewer complications and more cardiomyopathies are more likely to benefit from anticoagulation therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"27179"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230831/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Identification of Anticoagulation Benefit Subgroups of Patients With Left Ventricular Thrombus.\",\"authors\":\"Zechen Liu, Boqun Shi, Rui Zhang, Kefei Dou, Weihua Song\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/RCM27179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is associated with major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Anticoagulation represents the current primary management for LVT; however, current studies in some Asian populations suggest that the anticoagulation benefit in LVT patients is not significant. Given the heterogeneity of clinical phenotypes in LVT patients, the population of LVT patients who benefit from anticoagulation needs to be further explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study included patients diagnosed with LVT at the FuWai Hospital from 2009 to 2021. We performed a latent class analysis (LCA) based on important clinical characteristics to objectively determine the number and dimensionality of clusters. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox analysis were used to explore the relationship between anticoagulation therapy and MACCEs and major bleeding events in LVT patients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1085 patients were enrolled in this study, and during a median follow-up time of 36.5 months, 206 patients developed MACCEs, while 16 patients developed major bleeding events. Moreover, 1085 patients were categorized into four clusters following the LCA. In the adjusted model, the risk of MACCEs was significantly lower in LVT patients receiving anticoagulation in cluster 4 (hazard ratio (HR): 0.486, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.243-0.971) than in the group not receiving anticoagulation; however, there were no differences in the other three clusters or the whole population. There was a significant interaction between anticoagulation and the clustered subgroups (<i>p</i> for interaction in MACCEs: 0.046). However, no significant correlation was found for major bleeding events across clusters or for anticoagulant therapy.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study suggests that not all LVT patients benefit from anticoagulation therapy; younger LVT patients with fewer complications and more cardiomyopathies are more likely to benefit from anticoagulation therapy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"27179\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230831/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM27179\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM27179","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:左心室血栓(LVT)与主要不良心脑血管事件(MACCEs)相关。抗凝是目前LVT的主要治疗方法;然而,目前在一些亚洲人群中的研究表明,LVT患者的抗凝效果并不显著。鉴于LVT患者临床表型的异质性,从抗凝治疗中获益的LVT患者群体需要进一步探索。方法:本研究纳入阜外医院2009年至2021年诊断为LVT的患者。我们根据重要的临床特征进行了潜在类分析(LCA),以客观地确定聚类的数量和维度。此外,采用Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox分析探讨抗凝治疗与LVT患者MACCEs和大出血事件之间的关系。结果:本研究共纳入1085例患者,在36.5个月的中位随访期间,206例患者发生MACCEs, 16例患者发生大出血事件。此外,1085例患者在LCA后被分为四组。在调整后的模型中,第4组接受抗凝治疗的LVT患者发生MACCEs的风险显著低于未接受抗凝治疗的患者(风险比(HR): 0.486, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.243-0.971);然而,在其他三个群体或整个人群中没有差异。抗凝与聚集亚组之间存在显著的相互作用(MACCEs中相互作用的p为0.046)。然而,没有发现跨集群的大出血事件或抗凝治疗的显著相关性。结论:我们的研究表明,并非所有LVT患者都能从抗凝治疗中获益;并发症少、心肌病多的年轻LVT患者更有可能从抗凝治疗中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Identification of Anticoagulation Benefit Subgroups of Patients With Left Ventricular Thrombus.

Identification of Anticoagulation Benefit Subgroups of Patients With Left Ventricular Thrombus.

Identification of Anticoagulation Benefit Subgroups of Patients With Left Ventricular Thrombus.

Identification of Anticoagulation Benefit Subgroups of Patients With Left Ventricular Thrombus.

Background: Left ventricular thrombus (LVT) is associated with major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs). Anticoagulation represents the current primary management for LVT; however, current studies in some Asian populations suggest that the anticoagulation benefit in LVT patients is not significant. Given the heterogeneity of clinical phenotypes in LVT patients, the population of LVT patients who benefit from anticoagulation needs to be further explored.

Methods: This study included patients diagnosed with LVT at the FuWai Hospital from 2009 to 2021. We performed a latent class analysis (LCA) based on important clinical characteristics to objectively determine the number and dimensionality of clusters. Additionally, Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox analysis were used to explore the relationship between anticoagulation therapy and MACCEs and major bleeding events in LVT patients.

Results: A total of 1085 patients were enrolled in this study, and during a median follow-up time of 36.5 months, 206 patients developed MACCEs, while 16 patients developed major bleeding events. Moreover, 1085 patients were categorized into four clusters following the LCA. In the adjusted model, the risk of MACCEs was significantly lower in LVT patients receiving anticoagulation in cluster 4 (hazard ratio (HR): 0.486, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.243-0.971) than in the group not receiving anticoagulation; however, there were no differences in the other three clusters or the whole population. There was a significant interaction between anticoagulation and the clustered subgroups (p for interaction in MACCEs: 0.046). However, no significant correlation was found for major bleeding events across clusters or for anticoagulant therapy.

Conclusions: Our study suggests that not all LVT patients benefit from anticoagulation therapy; younger LVT patients with fewer complications and more cardiomyopathies are more likely to benefit from anticoagulation therapy.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine
Reviews in cardiovascular medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
3.70%
发文量
377
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信