Zhechuan Jin, Jiale Dong, Jian Yang, Chengxiang Li, Zequan Li, Zhaofei Ye, Yuyu Li, Ping Li, Yulin Li, Zhili Ji
{"title":"基于初步实验室结果的机器学习在急性主动脉夹层合并肠系膜灌注不良风险预测中的应用","authors":"Zhechuan Jin, Jiale Dong, Jian Yang, Chengxiang Li, Zequan Li, Zhaofei Ye, Yuyu Li, Ping Li, Yulin Li, Zhili Ji","doi":"10.31083/RCM37827","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesenteric malperfusion (MMP) represents a severe complication of acute aortic dissection (AAD). Research on risk identification models for MMP is currently limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a retrospective study of medical records from the Beijing Anzhen Hospital spanning from January 2016 to June 2022, we included 435 patients with AAD and allocated their data to training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. Key preoperative predictive variables were identified through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Subsequently, six machine learning algorithms were used to develop and validate an MMP risk identification model: logistic regression (LR), support vector classification (SVC), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), naive Bayes (NB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). To determine the optimal model, the performance of the model was evaluated using various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the Brier score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LASSO regression identified white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (NE), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum lactate levels, and arterial blood pH as key predictive variables. Among these, the WBC (OR 1.169, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.086, 1.258; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and LDH levels (OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.000, 1.003; <i>p</i> = 0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for MMP. Among the six assessed machine learning algorithms, the RF model exhibited the best predictive capabilities, yielding AUROCs of 0.888 (95% CI 0.887, 0.889) and 0.797 (95% CI 0.794, 0.800) in the training and testing datasets, respectively, as well as sensitivities of 0.864 (95% CI 0.862, 0.867) and 0.811 (95% CI 0.806, 0.816), respectively, in the corresponding datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study employed machine learning algorithms to develop a model capable of identifying MMP risk based on initial preoperative laboratory test results. This model can serve as a basis for making decisions in the treatment and diagnosis of MMP.</p>","PeriodicalId":20989,"journal":{"name":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","volume":"26 6","pages":"37827"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230842/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Application of Machine Learning in the Prediction of the Acute Aortic Dissection Risk Complicated by Mesenteric Malperfusion Based on Initial Laboratory Results.\",\"authors\":\"Zhechuan Jin, Jiale Dong, Jian Yang, Chengxiang Li, Zequan Li, Zhaofei Ye, Yuyu Li, Ping Li, Yulin Li, Zhili Ji\",\"doi\":\"10.31083/RCM37827\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mesenteric malperfusion (MMP) represents a severe complication of acute aortic dissection (AAD). Research on risk identification models for MMP is currently limited.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Based on a retrospective study of medical records from the Beijing Anzhen Hospital spanning from January 2016 to June 2022, we included 435 patients with AAD and allocated their data to training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. Key preoperative predictive variables were identified through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Subsequently, six machine learning algorithms were used to develop and validate an MMP risk identification model: logistic regression (LR), support vector classification (SVC), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), naive Bayes (NB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). To determine the optimal model, the performance of the model was evaluated using various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the Brier score.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LASSO regression identified white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (NE), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum lactate levels, and arterial blood pH as key predictive variables. Among these, the WBC (OR 1.169, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.086, 1.258; <i>p</i> < 0.001) and LDH levels (OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.000, 1.003; <i>p</i> = 0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for MMP. Among the six assessed machine learning algorithms, the RF model exhibited the best predictive capabilities, yielding AUROCs of 0.888 (95% CI 0.887, 0.889) and 0.797 (95% CI 0.794, 0.800) in the training and testing datasets, respectively, as well as sensitivities of 0.864 (95% CI 0.862, 0.867) and 0.811 (95% CI 0.806, 0.816), respectively, in the corresponding datasets.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study employed machine learning algorithms to develop a model capable of identifying MMP risk based on initial preoperative laboratory test results. This model can serve as a basis for making decisions in the treatment and diagnosis of MMP.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20989,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"volume\":\"26 6\",\"pages\":\"37827\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230842/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM37827\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/6/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reviews in cardiovascular medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/RCM37827","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:肠系膜灌注不良(MMP)是急性主动脉夹层(AAD)的严重并发症。目前对MMP风险识别模型的研究非常有限。方法:基于2016年1月至2022年6月北京安贞医院病历的回顾性研究,我们纳入435例AAD患者,并以7:3的比例将他们的数据分配到训练集和测试集。通过最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)回归确定关键的术前预测变量。随后,使用六种机器学习算法来开发和验证MMP风险识别模型:逻辑回归(LR)、支持向量分类(SVC)、随机森林(RF)、极端梯度增强(XGBoost)、朴素贝叶斯(NB)和多层感知器(MLP)。为了确定最佳模型,使用各种指标评估模型的性能,包括受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、准确性、灵敏度、特异性和Brier评分。结果:LASSO回归确定白细胞计数(WBC)、中性粒细胞计数(NE)、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)、血清乳酸水平和动脉血pH值为关键预测变量。其中,WBC (OR 1.169, 95%可信区间[CI] 1.086, 1.258;p < 0.001)和LDH水平(OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.000, 1.003;p = 0.008)为MMP的独立危险因素。在六种评估的机器学习算法中,RF模型表现出最好的预测能力,在训练和测试数据集中的auroc分别为0.888 (95% CI 0.887, 0.889)和0.797 (95% CI 0.794, 0.800),在相应数据集中的灵敏度分别为0.864 (95% CI 0.862, 0.867)和0.811 (95% CI 0.806, 0.816)。结论:本研究采用机器学习算法开发了一个能够根据初始术前实验室检查结果识别MMP风险的模型。该模型可作为MMP治疗和诊断决策的依据。
Application of Machine Learning in the Prediction of the Acute Aortic Dissection Risk Complicated by Mesenteric Malperfusion Based on Initial Laboratory Results.
Background: Mesenteric malperfusion (MMP) represents a severe complication of acute aortic dissection (AAD). Research on risk identification models for MMP is currently limited.
Methods: Based on a retrospective study of medical records from the Beijing Anzhen Hospital spanning from January 2016 to June 2022, we included 435 patients with AAD and allocated their data to training and testing sets at a ratio of 7:3. Key preoperative predictive variables were identified through the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. Subsequently, six machine learning algorithms were used to develop and validate an MMP risk identification model: logistic regression (LR), support vector classification (SVC), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), naive Bayes (NB), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). To determine the optimal model, the performance of the model was evaluated using various metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the Brier score.
Results: LASSO regression identified white blood cell count (WBC), neutrophil count (NE), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), serum lactate levels, and arterial blood pH as key predictive variables. Among these, the WBC (OR 1.169, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.086, 1.258; p < 0.001) and LDH levels (OR 1.001, 95% CI 1.000, 1.003; p = 0.008) were identified as independent risk factors for MMP. Among the six assessed machine learning algorithms, the RF model exhibited the best predictive capabilities, yielding AUROCs of 0.888 (95% CI 0.887, 0.889) and 0.797 (95% CI 0.794, 0.800) in the training and testing datasets, respectively, as well as sensitivities of 0.864 (95% CI 0.862, 0.867) and 0.811 (95% CI 0.806, 0.816), respectively, in the corresponding datasets.
Conclusions: This study employed machine learning algorithms to develop a model capable of identifying MMP risk based on initial preoperative laboratory test results. This model can serve as a basis for making decisions in the treatment and diagnosis of MMP.
期刊介绍:
RCM is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal. RCM publishes research articles, review papers and short communications on cardiovascular medicine as well as research on cardiovascular disease. We aim to provide a forum for publishing papers which explore the pathogenesis and promote the progression of cardiac and vascular diseases. We also seek to establish an interdisciplinary platform, focusing on translational issues, to facilitate the advancement of research, clinical treatment and diagnostic procedures. Heart surgery, cardiovascular imaging, risk factors and various clinical cardiac & vascular research will be considered.