应用性能边界评价非or麻醉(NORA)效率。

IF 5.7 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Justin S Routman, Erik J Zhang, Jonathan D Blocker, Juhan Paiste, Mitchell H Tsai
{"title":"应用性能边界评价非or麻醉(NORA)效率。","authors":"Justin S Routman, Erik J Zhang, Jonathan D Blocker, Juhan Paiste, Mitchell H Tsai","doi":"10.1007/s10916-025-02229-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In high-cost, high-revenue operating room (OR) suites, dashboards displaying key performance indicators are commonplace to optimize efficiency. Given the significant successes attained, further gains may risk compromising safety. In contrast, challenges unique to non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) sites have hindered operational efficiency. Existing productivity evaluation frameworks often fall short in guiding strategic and tactical improvements in NORA delivery. Performance frontiers have proven effective in evaluating OR systems, but their application to NORA remains unexplored. This study applies performance frontiers to assess NORA site efficiency and formulates potential operational strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated anesthesia billing records at our primary hospital from 1 April 2022 to 30 March 2023. Cases from operating room and NORA locations were included, except for sites with irregular volume or financial arrangements. We included only non-holiday weekdays, defining NORA block time as 7 AM to 5 PM. For each room, we calculated under-utilized (time with no anesthesia billing) and over-utilized minutes (time billed outside of NORA block hours). Data for each location were plotted as rolling 4-week sums, normalized to scheduled NORA block time. Performance frontiers were then developed and plotted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 246 non-holiday weekdays, 42,424 cases had billable minutes during NORA block time, comprising 20,003 (47.2%) NORA cases and 22,421 (52.8%) OR cases. Performance frontiers revealed significant variability, with nonparametric tests confirming statistical significance and non-equivalence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Performance frontiers reveal substantial efficiency variability across NORA sites, underscoring the need for targeted interventions. Some sites matched OR efficiency levels, while others showed substantial differences, particularly those with high variability and urgency. Efficient sites can leverage performance frontiers to optimize resource allocation, while inefficient locations may benefit from a shared anesthesia resource pool for real-time resource allocation. Performance frontiers provide a novel approach for operational leaders to make more effective strategic decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16338,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medical Systems","volume":"49 1","pages":"96"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238198/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using Performance Frontiers To Evaluate Non-OR Anesthesia (NORA) Efficiency.\",\"authors\":\"Justin S Routman, Erik J Zhang, Jonathan D Blocker, Juhan Paiste, Mitchell H Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10916-025-02229-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In high-cost, high-revenue operating room (OR) suites, dashboards displaying key performance indicators are commonplace to optimize efficiency. Given the significant successes attained, further gains may risk compromising safety. In contrast, challenges unique to non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) sites have hindered operational efficiency. Existing productivity evaluation frameworks often fall short in guiding strategic and tactical improvements in NORA delivery. Performance frontiers have proven effective in evaluating OR systems, but their application to NORA remains unexplored. This study applies performance frontiers to assess NORA site efficiency and formulates potential operational strategies.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated anesthesia billing records at our primary hospital from 1 April 2022 to 30 March 2023. Cases from operating room and NORA locations were included, except for sites with irregular volume or financial arrangements. We included only non-holiday weekdays, defining NORA block time as 7 AM to 5 PM. For each room, we calculated under-utilized (time with no anesthesia billing) and over-utilized minutes (time billed outside of NORA block hours). Data for each location were plotted as rolling 4-week sums, normalized to scheduled NORA block time. Performance frontiers were then developed and plotted.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Over 246 non-holiday weekdays, 42,424 cases had billable minutes during NORA block time, comprising 20,003 (47.2%) NORA cases and 22,421 (52.8%) OR cases. Performance frontiers revealed significant variability, with nonparametric tests confirming statistical significance and non-equivalence.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Performance frontiers reveal substantial efficiency variability across NORA sites, underscoring the need for targeted interventions. Some sites matched OR efficiency levels, while others showed substantial differences, particularly those with high variability and urgency. Efficient sites can leverage performance frontiers to optimize resource allocation, while inefficient locations may benefit from a shared anesthesia resource pool for real-time resource allocation. Performance frontiers provide a novel approach for operational leaders to make more effective strategic decisions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16338,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"volume\":\"49 1\",\"pages\":\"96\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12238198/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Medical Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02229-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medical Systems","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-025-02229-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:在高成本、高收入的手术室(OR)套房中,显示关键绩效指标的仪表板是优化效率的常见方法。鉴于已取得的重大成就,进一步的进展可能会危及安全。相比之下,非手术室麻醉(NORA)部位特有的挑战阻碍了操作效率。现有的生产力评价框架在指导NORA交付的战略和战术改进方面往往不足。性能边界在评估OR系统方面已被证明是有效的,但它们在NORA中的应用仍未被探索。本研究应用性能前沿评估NORA站点效率,并制定潜在的运营策略。方法:对本院2022年4月1日至2023年3月30日的麻醉计费记录进行评估。包括手术室和NORA地点的病例,但数量或财务安排不正常的地点除外。我们只包括非假日工作日,将NORA块时间定义为早上7点到下午5点。对于每个房间,我们计算了未充分利用的时间(没有麻醉计费的时间)和过度利用的分钟数(计费的时间超出NORA的时段)。每个地点的数据被绘制为滚动的4周总和,归一化为预定的NORA块时间。然后开发和绘制性能边界。结果:246个非假日工作日,42424例患者在NORA阻断时间内有计费分钟,其中NORA病例20003例(47.2%),OR病例22421例(52.8%)。性能前沿显示出显著的可变性,非参数检验证实了统计显著性和非等效性。讨论:性能边界揭示了NORA站点之间的实质性效率差异,强调了有针对性干预的必要性。一些站点匹配OR效率水平,而其他站点则显示出实质性差异,特别是那些高变异性和紧迫性的站点。高效站点可以利用性能边界来优化资源分配,而低效站点可以从共享麻醉资源池中受益,从而实现实时资源分配。绩效边界为业务领导者制定更有效的战略决策提供了一种新颖的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Using Performance Frontiers To Evaluate Non-OR Anesthesia (NORA) Efficiency.

Using Performance Frontiers To Evaluate Non-OR Anesthesia (NORA) Efficiency.

Using Performance Frontiers To Evaluate Non-OR Anesthesia (NORA) Efficiency.

Using Performance Frontiers To Evaluate Non-OR Anesthesia (NORA) Efficiency.

Introduction: In high-cost, high-revenue operating room (OR) suites, dashboards displaying key performance indicators are commonplace to optimize efficiency. Given the significant successes attained, further gains may risk compromising safety. In contrast, challenges unique to non-operating room anesthesia (NORA) sites have hindered operational efficiency. Existing productivity evaluation frameworks often fall short in guiding strategic and tactical improvements in NORA delivery. Performance frontiers have proven effective in evaluating OR systems, but their application to NORA remains unexplored. This study applies performance frontiers to assess NORA site efficiency and formulates potential operational strategies.

Methods: We evaluated anesthesia billing records at our primary hospital from 1 April 2022 to 30 March 2023. Cases from operating room and NORA locations were included, except for sites with irregular volume or financial arrangements. We included only non-holiday weekdays, defining NORA block time as 7 AM to 5 PM. For each room, we calculated under-utilized (time with no anesthesia billing) and over-utilized minutes (time billed outside of NORA block hours). Data for each location were plotted as rolling 4-week sums, normalized to scheduled NORA block time. Performance frontiers were then developed and plotted.

Results: Over 246 non-holiday weekdays, 42,424 cases had billable minutes during NORA block time, comprising 20,003 (47.2%) NORA cases and 22,421 (52.8%) OR cases. Performance frontiers revealed significant variability, with nonparametric tests confirming statistical significance and non-equivalence.

Discussion: Performance frontiers reveal substantial efficiency variability across NORA sites, underscoring the need for targeted interventions. Some sites matched OR efficiency levels, while others showed substantial differences, particularly those with high variability and urgency. Efficient sites can leverage performance frontiers to optimize resource allocation, while inefficient locations may benefit from a shared anesthesia resource pool for real-time resource allocation. Performance frontiers provide a novel approach for operational leaders to make more effective strategic decisions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medical Systems
Journal of Medical Systems 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
1.90%
发文量
83
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Medical Systems provides a forum for the presentation and discussion of the increasingly extensive applications of new systems techniques and methods in hospital clinic and physician''s office administration; pathology radiology and pharmaceutical delivery systems; medical records storage and retrieval; and ancillary patient-support systems. The journal publishes informative articles essays and studies across the entire scale of medical systems from large hospital programs to novel small-scale medical services. Education is an integral part of this amalgamation of sciences and selected articles are published in this area. Since existing medical systems are constantly being modified to fit particular circumstances and to solve specific problems the journal includes a special section devoted to status reports on current installations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信