大颈静脉曲张:前置胎盘出血的关键危险因素。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Akio Kamiya, Takahiro Yamada, Aya Yoshida, Shuhei Nishibata, Kaede Oku, Mamoru Morikawa, Hidetaka Okada
{"title":"大颈静脉曲张:前置胎盘出血的关键危险因素。","authors":"Akio Kamiya, Takahiro Yamada, Aya Yoshida, Shuhei Nishibata, Kaede Oku, Mamoru Morikawa, Hidetaka Okada","doi":"10.1159/000547269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether the volume of cervical varices, quantified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), predicts massive intraoperative blood loss in placenta previa. The secondary objective was to examine the relationship between cervical varices volume and placental location, sponge-like findings on transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), and active lower uterine segment bleeding.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials, setting, methods: </strong>This study included 98 individuals with singleton pregnancies and placenta previa who underwent prenatal MRI and cesarean section (CS) at a tertiary care center in Japan between April 2012 and March 2021. MRI was performed around 34 weeks of gestation as part of routine PAS screening. Cervical varices were defined as high-signal vascular structures located within the cervix and lower uterine segment on sagittal T2-weighted MRI. Their volume was manually calculated as an approximate cervical varices volume (aVCV). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal aVCV cutoff for predicting massive blood loss (defined as ≥1500 mL). Logistic regression was used to assess independent predictors of bleeding. A subgroup analysis was conducted among patients with posterior placenta previa without placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cervical varices were detected by MRI in 94.9% of cases. ROC analysis identified 36.0 cm³ as the optimal aVCV cutoff (AUC: 0.63), with a specificity of 86.2% and positive predictive value of 75.9%. Large cervical varices (aVCV > 36.0 cm³) were significantly associated with massive bleeding (adjusted odds ratio: 9.44; 95% CI: 3.11-28.7). They also correlated with sponge-like findings on TVUS and posterior placental location, but were smaller in cases with anterior placenta or PAS despite high bleeding volumes. Active bleeding from the lower uterine segment was more common in the large aVCV group and was associated with massive hemorrhage in non-PAS cases. In a subgroup of patients with posterior placenta previa without PAS (n = 43), predictive performance improved (AUC: 0.72; specificity: 95.8%; odds ratio: 9.53; 95% CI: 2.19-41.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large cervical varices are an independent predictor of massive blood loss in placenta previa, particularly in posterior previa without PAS. Recognition of cervical venous enlargement as a core hemorrhagic risk factor may improve preoperative preparedness and promote broader efforts to refine diagnostic approaches.</p>","PeriodicalId":12952,"journal":{"name":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","volume":" ","pages":"1-19"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Large Cervical Varices: A Key Risk Factor for Hemorrhage in Placenta Previa.\",\"authors\":\"Akio Kamiya, Takahiro Yamada, Aya Yoshida, Shuhei Nishibata, Kaede Oku, Mamoru Morikawa, Hidetaka Okada\",\"doi\":\"10.1159/000547269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine whether the volume of cervical varices, quantified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), predicts massive intraoperative blood loss in placenta previa. The secondary objective was to examine the relationship between cervical varices volume and placental location, sponge-like findings on transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), and active lower uterine segment bleeding.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective cohort study.</p><p><strong>Participants/materials, setting, methods: </strong>This study included 98 individuals with singleton pregnancies and placenta previa who underwent prenatal MRI and cesarean section (CS) at a tertiary care center in Japan between April 2012 and March 2021. MRI was performed around 34 weeks of gestation as part of routine PAS screening. Cervical varices were defined as high-signal vascular structures located within the cervix and lower uterine segment on sagittal T2-weighted MRI. Their volume was manually calculated as an approximate cervical varices volume (aVCV). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal aVCV cutoff for predicting massive blood loss (defined as ≥1500 mL). Logistic regression was used to assess independent predictors of bleeding. A subgroup analysis was conducted among patients with posterior placenta previa without placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Cervical varices were detected by MRI in 94.9% of cases. ROC analysis identified 36.0 cm³ as the optimal aVCV cutoff (AUC: 0.63), with a specificity of 86.2% and positive predictive value of 75.9%. Large cervical varices (aVCV > 36.0 cm³) were significantly associated with massive bleeding (adjusted odds ratio: 9.44; 95% CI: 3.11-28.7). They also correlated with sponge-like findings on TVUS and posterior placental location, but were smaller in cases with anterior placenta or PAS despite high bleeding volumes. Active bleeding from the lower uterine segment was more common in the large aVCV group and was associated with massive hemorrhage in non-PAS cases. In a subgroup of patients with posterior placenta previa without PAS (n = 43), predictive performance improved (AUC: 0.72; specificity: 95.8%; odds ratio: 9.53; 95% CI: 2.19-41.4).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Large cervical varices are an independent predictor of massive blood loss in placenta previa, particularly in posterior previa without PAS. Recognition of cervical venous enlargement as a core hemorrhagic risk factor may improve preoperative preparedness and promote broader efforts to refine diagnostic approaches.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547269\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000547269","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:通过磁共振成像(MRI)量化颈静脉曲张的体积,以确定是否可以预测前置胎盘术中大量失血。次要目的是探讨宫颈静脉曲张体积与胎盘位置、经阴道超声(TVUS)的海绵状发现和活跃的下子宫段出血之间的关系。设计:回顾性队列研究。参与者/材料、环境、方法:本研究包括2012年4月至2021年3月期间在日本一家三级保健中心接受产前MRI和剖宫产(CS)检查的98例单胎妊娠和前置胎盘患者。MRI在妊娠34周左右进行,作为常规PAS筛查的一部分。在矢状面t2加权MRI上,宫颈静脉曲张被定义为位于宫颈和子宫下段的高信号血管结构。它们的体积被人工计算为近似的颈静脉曲张体积(aVCV)。采用受试者工作特征(ROC)分析确定预测大量失血(定义为≥1500ml)的最佳aVCV截止值。采用Logistic回归评估出血的独立预测因素。对无增生性胎盘谱(PAS)的后前置胎盘患者进行亚组分析。结果:MRI检查颈静脉曲张检出率为94.9%。ROC分析确定36.0 cm³为最佳aVCV临界值(AUC: 0.63),特异性为86.2%,阳性预测值为75.9%。大颈静脉曲张(aVCV bb0 36.0 cm³)与大出血显著相关(校正优势比:9.44;95% ci: 3.11-28.7)。它们也与TVUS和后胎盘位置的海绵状发现相关,但在前胎盘或PAS患者中,尽管出血量大,但它们较小。子宫下段活动性出血在大aVCV组中更为常见,在非pas病例中与大出血相关。在没有PAS的后前置胎盘患者亚组中(n = 43),预测性能得到改善(AUC: 0.72;特异性:95.8%;优势比:9.53;95% ci: 2.19-41.4)。结论:大颈静脉曲张是前置胎盘大量失血的独立预测因子,特别是在没有PAS的后前置胎盘。认识到宫颈静脉肿大是一个核心的出血危险因素,可以改善术前准备,促进更广泛的努力,以完善诊断方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Large Cervical Varices: A Key Risk Factor for Hemorrhage in Placenta Previa.

Objectives: To determine whether the volume of cervical varices, quantified by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), predicts massive intraoperative blood loss in placenta previa. The secondary objective was to examine the relationship between cervical varices volume and placental location, sponge-like findings on transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS), and active lower uterine segment bleeding.

Design: Retrospective cohort study.

Participants/materials, setting, methods: This study included 98 individuals with singleton pregnancies and placenta previa who underwent prenatal MRI and cesarean section (CS) at a tertiary care center in Japan between April 2012 and March 2021. MRI was performed around 34 weeks of gestation as part of routine PAS screening. Cervical varices were defined as high-signal vascular structures located within the cervix and lower uterine segment on sagittal T2-weighted MRI. Their volume was manually calculated as an approximate cervical varices volume (aVCV). Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to determine the optimal aVCV cutoff for predicting massive blood loss (defined as ≥1500 mL). Logistic regression was used to assess independent predictors of bleeding. A subgroup analysis was conducted among patients with posterior placenta previa without placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).

Results: Cervical varices were detected by MRI in 94.9% of cases. ROC analysis identified 36.0 cm³ as the optimal aVCV cutoff (AUC: 0.63), with a specificity of 86.2% and positive predictive value of 75.9%. Large cervical varices (aVCV > 36.0 cm³) were significantly associated with massive bleeding (adjusted odds ratio: 9.44; 95% CI: 3.11-28.7). They also correlated with sponge-like findings on TVUS and posterior placental location, but were smaller in cases with anterior placenta or PAS despite high bleeding volumes. Active bleeding from the lower uterine segment was more common in the large aVCV group and was associated with massive hemorrhage in non-PAS cases. In a subgroup of patients with posterior placenta previa without PAS (n = 43), predictive performance improved (AUC: 0.72; specificity: 95.8%; odds ratio: 9.53; 95% CI: 2.19-41.4).

Conclusions: Large cervical varices are an independent predictor of massive blood loss in placenta previa, particularly in posterior previa without PAS. Recognition of cervical venous enlargement as a core hemorrhagic risk factor may improve preoperative preparedness and promote broader efforts to refine diagnostic approaches.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
44
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: This journal covers the most active and promising areas of current research in gynecology and obstetrics. Invited, well-referenced reviews by noted experts keep readers in touch with the general framework and direction of international study. Original papers report selected experimental and clinical investigations in all fields related to gynecology, obstetrics and reproduction. Short communications are published to allow immediate discussion of new data. The international and interdisciplinary character of this periodical provides an avenue to less accessible sources and to worldwide research for investigators and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信