肝硬化患者程序性出血的预防与处理进展。

IF 5.9 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Jessica P E Davis, Alberto Q Farias, Nicolas M Intagliata
{"title":"肝硬化患者程序性出血的预防与处理进展。","authors":"Jessica P E Davis, Alberto Q Farias, Nicolas M Intagliata","doi":"10.1007/s12072-025-10834-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with cirrhosis frequently require procedures and are at risk of bleeding related to interventions. Procedural bleeding adversely impacts patients with cirrhosis and is associated with mortality. Assessment of bleeding risk in these patients is complex due to changes in hemostasis, portal hypertension, elevated thrombosis risk, and comorbid infection and renal disease. This clinical review will discuss current data regarding risk assessment, prevention, and management of procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Risk of procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis involves patient-related and procedure-related factors. Conventional hemostasis parameters such as prothrombin time and platelet count are not predictive of bleeding in cirrhosis and may lead providers to overestimate bleeding risk. Hepatic decompensation, kidney injury, metabolic syndrome, alcohol use, and infections are all associated with increased bleeding risk. Procedure type, urgency, and operator experience also influence procedural bleeding risk. Historically pre-procedural transfusion support has been used in attempt to mitigate procedural bleeding risk. However, mounting data argues against this approach. Patient optimization, procedure conditions, and procedure technique can minimize bleeding risk. Viscoelastic testing may be useful to reduce the use of prophylactic transfusion and reassure proceduralists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Historically, the risk of procedural bleeding has been overestimated in patients with cirrhosis due to abnormal conventional coagulation testing including prolonged prothrombin time and thrombocytopenia. Prophylactic transfusion has not been consistently demonstrated to reduce bleeding risk and carries some risks. Performing only necessary procedures under optimal conditions with safe technique and preparation for rescue transfusion can minimize procedural-associated bleeding and its consequences.</p>","PeriodicalId":12901,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances in the prevention and management of procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.\",\"authors\":\"Jessica P E Davis, Alberto Q Farias, Nicolas M Intagliata\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12072-025-10834-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Patients with cirrhosis frequently require procedures and are at risk of bleeding related to interventions. Procedural bleeding adversely impacts patients with cirrhosis and is associated with mortality. Assessment of bleeding risk in these patients is complex due to changes in hemostasis, portal hypertension, elevated thrombosis risk, and comorbid infection and renal disease. This clinical review will discuss current data regarding risk assessment, prevention, and management of procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Risk of procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis involves patient-related and procedure-related factors. Conventional hemostasis parameters such as prothrombin time and platelet count are not predictive of bleeding in cirrhosis and may lead providers to overestimate bleeding risk. Hepatic decompensation, kidney injury, metabolic syndrome, alcohol use, and infections are all associated with increased bleeding risk. Procedure type, urgency, and operator experience also influence procedural bleeding risk. Historically pre-procedural transfusion support has been used in attempt to mitigate procedural bleeding risk. However, mounting data argues against this approach. Patient optimization, procedure conditions, and procedure technique can minimize bleeding risk. Viscoelastic testing may be useful to reduce the use of prophylactic transfusion and reassure proceduralists.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Historically, the risk of procedural bleeding has been overestimated in patients with cirrhosis due to abnormal conventional coagulation testing including prolonged prothrombin time and thrombocytopenia. Prophylactic transfusion has not been consistently demonstrated to reduce bleeding risk and carries some risks. Performing only necessary procedures under optimal conditions with safe technique and preparation for rescue transfusion can minimize procedural-associated bleeding and its consequences.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12901,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hepatology International\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hepatology International\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-025-10834-2\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-025-10834-2","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:肝硬化患者经常需要手术,并且存在与干预相关的出血风险。程序性出血对肝硬化患者有不利影响,并与死亡率相关。由于止血变化、门脉高压、血栓形成风险升高、合并症感染和肾脏疾病,这些患者出血风险的评估是复杂的。本临床综述将讨论肝硬化患者程序性出血的风险评估、预防和处理的最新数据。讨论:肝硬化患者的程序性出血风险涉及患者相关因素和手术相关因素。传统的止血参数,如凝血酶原时间和血小板计数不能预测肝硬化出血,并可能导致提供者高估出血风险。肝失代偿、肾损伤、代谢综合征、饮酒和感染都与出血风险增加有关。手术类型、紧急程度和手术经验也会影响手术出血风险。历史上,手术前输血支持已被用于减轻手术出血风险。然而,越来越多的数据反对这种做法。患者优化,手术条件和手术技术可以最大限度地降低出血风险。粘弹性试验可能有助于减少预防性输血的使用,并使程序主义者放心。结论:历史上,由于常规凝血检查异常,包括凝血酶原时间延长和血小板减少,肝硬化患者的程序性出血风险被高估。预防性输血并没有一贯证明能降低出血风险,而且存在一些风险。仅在最佳条件下使用安全技术和急救输血准备进行必要的手术,可最大限度地减少手术相关出血及其后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advances in the prevention and management of procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

Introduction: Patients with cirrhosis frequently require procedures and are at risk of bleeding related to interventions. Procedural bleeding adversely impacts patients with cirrhosis and is associated with mortality. Assessment of bleeding risk in these patients is complex due to changes in hemostasis, portal hypertension, elevated thrombosis risk, and comorbid infection and renal disease. This clinical review will discuss current data regarding risk assessment, prevention, and management of procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis.

Discussion: Risk of procedural bleeding in patients with cirrhosis involves patient-related and procedure-related factors. Conventional hemostasis parameters such as prothrombin time and platelet count are not predictive of bleeding in cirrhosis and may lead providers to overestimate bleeding risk. Hepatic decompensation, kidney injury, metabolic syndrome, alcohol use, and infections are all associated with increased bleeding risk. Procedure type, urgency, and operator experience also influence procedural bleeding risk. Historically pre-procedural transfusion support has been used in attempt to mitigate procedural bleeding risk. However, mounting data argues against this approach. Patient optimization, procedure conditions, and procedure technique can minimize bleeding risk. Viscoelastic testing may be useful to reduce the use of prophylactic transfusion and reassure proceduralists.

Conclusion: Historically, the risk of procedural bleeding has been overestimated in patients with cirrhosis due to abnormal conventional coagulation testing including prolonged prothrombin time and thrombocytopenia. Prophylactic transfusion has not been consistently demonstrated to reduce bleeding risk and carries some risks. Performing only necessary procedures under optimal conditions with safe technique and preparation for rescue transfusion can minimize procedural-associated bleeding and its consequences.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hepatology International
Hepatology International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). This is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal will focus mainly on new and emerging technologies, cutting-edge science and advances in liver and biliary disorders. Types of articles published: -Original Research Articles related to clinical care and basic research -Review Articles -Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment -Clinical cases, images -Selected Author Summaries -Video Submissions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信