慢性非特异性腰背痛的腰方肌僵硬:诊断准确性研究。

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Mónica López-Redondo, Davinia Vicente-Campos, Javier Álvarez-González, Alberto Roldán-Ruiz, Sandra Sánchez-Jorge, Jorge Buffet-García, María José Díaz-Arribas, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero
{"title":"慢性非特异性腰背痛的腰方肌僵硬:诊断准确性研究。","authors":"Mónica López-Redondo, Davinia Vicente-Campos, Javier Álvarez-González, Alberto Roldán-Ruiz, Sandra Sánchez-Jorge, Jorge Buffet-García, María José Díaz-Arribas, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero","doi":"10.1007/s00586-025-09114-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of muscle tenderness is encouraged in the diagnosis of low back pain (LBP). However, manual palpation is poorly reliable and objective methods to quantify muscle stiffness are needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness differences between individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) and pain-free controls, analyze side-to-side stiffness differences, and assess the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted recruiting 40 patients with chronic non-specific LBP and 40 asymptomatic controls. Variables assessed included muscle stiffness using shear wave elastography metrics (shear wave speed (SWS) and Young's modulus (YM)), pain chronicity, pain intensity, pain-related disability (using the Oswestry Disability Index) and symptoms associated with central sensitization (using the Central Sensitization Inventory). Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant side-to-side stiffness differences were observed within either group (both, p > 0.05). Quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness was significantly lower in LBP patients compared to controls (SWS p = 0.010; YM p = 0.008). The receiver operating characteristic analysis for both metrics showed poor discriminatory ability (< 0.7). A modest balance between sensitivity (SWS 70%; YM 75%) and specificity (SWS 97.5%; YM 50%) was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although greater stiffness was expected due to the associated prevalence of trigger points in patients with LBP, quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness was significantly lower in patients suffering chronic non-specific LBP compared to controls. Despite significant differences, the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography was poor, requiring further research to improve the diagnostic utility of shear wave elastography.</p>","PeriodicalId":12323,"journal":{"name":"European Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness in chronic non-specific low back pain: a diagnostic accuracy study.\",\"authors\":\"Mónica López-Redondo, Davinia Vicente-Campos, Javier Álvarez-González, Alberto Roldán-Ruiz, Sandra Sánchez-Jorge, Jorge Buffet-García, María José Díaz-Arribas, Juan Antonio Valera-Calero\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00586-025-09114-2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Evaluation of muscle tenderness is encouraged in the diagnosis of low back pain (LBP). However, manual palpation is poorly reliable and objective methods to quantify muscle stiffness are needed.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness differences between individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) and pain-free controls, analyze side-to-side stiffness differences, and assess the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted recruiting 40 patients with chronic non-specific LBP and 40 asymptomatic controls. Variables assessed included muscle stiffness using shear wave elastography metrics (shear wave speed (SWS) and Young's modulus (YM)), pain chronicity, pain intensity, pain-related disability (using the Oswestry Disability Index) and symptoms associated with central sensitization (using the Central Sensitization Inventory). Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>No significant side-to-side stiffness differences were observed within either group (both, p > 0.05). Quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness was significantly lower in LBP patients compared to controls (SWS p = 0.010; YM p = 0.008). The receiver operating characteristic analysis for both metrics showed poor discriminatory ability (< 0.7). A modest balance between sensitivity (SWS 70%; YM 75%) and specificity (SWS 97.5%; YM 50%) was found.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although greater stiffness was expected due to the associated prevalence of trigger points in patients with LBP, quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness was significantly lower in patients suffering chronic non-specific LBP compared to controls. Despite significant differences, the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography was poor, requiring further research to improve the diagnostic utility of shear wave elastography.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12323,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Spine Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09114-2\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-09114-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在诊断腰痛(LBP)时,鼓励评估肌肉压痛。然而,手工触诊的可靠性较差,需要客观的方法来量化肌肉僵硬度。目的:探讨慢性非特异性腰痛(LBP)患者与无痛对照者腰方肌僵硬度的差异,分析侧对侧僵硬度差异,并评估剪切波弹性成像诊断的准确性。方法:采用横断面研究方法,招募40例慢性非特异性腰痛患者和40例无症状对照。评估的变量包括使用剪切波弹性学指标(剪切波速度(SWS)和杨氏模量(YM))的肌肉僵硬度、疼痛慢性、疼痛强度、疼痛相关残疾(使用Oswestry残疾指数)和与中枢致敏相关的症状(使用中枢致敏量表)。通过敏感性、特异性和受者操作特征分析来评估诊断的准确性。结果:在两组内均未观察到显著的侧对侧刚度差异(均p < 0.05)。与对照组相比,腰痛患者腰方肌僵硬度显著降低(SWS p = 0.010;p = 0.008)。两项指标的受试者操作特征分析均显示出较差的区分能力(结论:尽管由于与LBP患者相关的触发点的流行,预计会有更大的僵硬,但与对照组相比,慢性非特异性LBP患者的腰方肌僵硬度显着降低。尽管存在显著差异,但剪切波弹性成像的诊断准确性较差,需要进一步研究以提高剪切波弹性成像的诊断实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness in chronic non-specific low back pain: a diagnostic accuracy study.

Background: Evaluation of muscle tenderness is encouraged in the diagnosis of low back pain (LBP). However, manual palpation is poorly reliable and objective methods to quantify muscle stiffness are needed.

Objectives: To investigate quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness differences between individuals with chronic non-specific low back pain (LBP) and pain-free controls, analyze side-to-side stiffness differences, and assess the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted recruiting 40 patients with chronic non-specific LBP and 40 asymptomatic controls. Variables assessed included muscle stiffness using shear wave elastography metrics (shear wave speed (SWS) and Young's modulus (YM)), pain chronicity, pain intensity, pain-related disability (using the Oswestry Disability Index) and symptoms associated with central sensitization (using the Central Sensitization Inventory). Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated through sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic analysis.

Results: No significant side-to-side stiffness differences were observed within either group (both, p > 0.05). Quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness was significantly lower in LBP patients compared to controls (SWS p = 0.010; YM p = 0.008). The receiver operating characteristic analysis for both metrics showed poor discriminatory ability (< 0.7). A modest balance between sensitivity (SWS 70%; YM 75%) and specificity (SWS 97.5%; YM 50%) was found.

Conclusions: Although greater stiffness was expected due to the associated prevalence of trigger points in patients with LBP, quadratus lumborum muscle stiffness was significantly lower in patients suffering chronic non-specific LBP compared to controls. Despite significant differences, the diagnostic accuracy of shear wave elastography was poor, requiring further research to improve the diagnostic utility of shear wave elastography.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Spine Journal
European Spine Journal 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
10.70%
发文量
373
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: "European Spine Journal" is a publication founded in response to the increasing trend toward specialization in spinal surgery and spinal pathology in general. The Journal is devoted to all spine related disciplines, including functional and surgical anatomy of the spine, biomechanics and pathophysiology, diagnostic procedures, and neurology, surgery and outcomes. The aim of "European Spine Journal" is to support the further development of highly innovative spine treatments including but not restricted to surgery and to provide an integrated and balanced view of diagnostic, research and treatment procedures as well as outcomes that will enhance effective collaboration among specialists worldwide. The “European Spine Journal” also participates in education by means of videos, interactive meetings and the endorsement of educative efforts. Official publication of EUROSPINE, The Spine Society of Europe
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信