手术体位是否影响经皮经椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术的结果和患者满意度:一项单中心回顾性研究。

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Wangxin Liu, Qi Zhang, Enpeng Gu, Huihui Sun, Lei Liu, Zhicheng Pan
{"title":"手术体位是否影响经皮经椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术的结果和患者满意度:一项单中心回顾性研究。","authors":"Wangxin Liu, Qi Zhang, Enpeng Gu, Huihui Sun, Lei Liu, Zhicheng Pan","doi":"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001875","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of different surgical positions on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The effect of lateral position (LP) versus prone position (PP) on PTED efficacy and patient satisfaction has not been entirely investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes 85 patients who underwent PTED surgery for lumbar disc herniation from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, at Binhai New District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The patients were categorized into the LP group (n=43) and the PP group (n=42) according to the different positions when they underwent PTED surgery. The demographic data, preoperative data, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, operative duration time, length of postoperative hospital stay, VAS scores, lumbar JOA scores, complications, and patient satisfaction were all compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PP in PTED reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy times and operative duration compared with LP. The mean intraoperative fluoroscopy times for the 42 patients in the PP group were 7.52 (SD: 1.79) compared with 12.26 (SD: 2.11) for 43 patients in the LP group, a statistically significant difference (95% CI: 3.88-5.59, P<0.001). The mean operative duration time was 84.16 minutes (SD: 11.67) in the PP group and 76.48 minutes (SD: 8.77) in the LP group, with a statistically significant difference (95% CI: 9.17- 18.21, P<0.001). Forty-one patients in the PP group (97.62%) and 38 patients in the PP group (88.37%) were satisfied with the surgery (P=0.027). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the length of postoperative hospital stay, complications, postoperative VAS scores (1 d, 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo) and postoperative JOA scores (1 wk, 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTED performed in the PP has fewer fluoroscopy times, shorter operative duration, and higher satisfaction with postoperative rehabilitation after the surgery. No difference existed in postoperative recovery between the 2 groups. However, more studies are needed to further evaluate the effect of surgical position on surgery and clinical outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":10457,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Spine Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Does Surgical Position Affect Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.\",\"authors\":\"Wangxin Liu, Qi Zhang, Enpeng Gu, Huihui Sun, Lei Liu, Zhicheng Pan\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/BSD.0000000000001875\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>A retrospective, single-center study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of different surgical positions on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED).</p><p><strong>Summary of background data: </strong>The effect of lateral position (LP) versus prone position (PP) on PTED efficacy and patient satisfaction has not been entirely investigated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study includes 85 patients who underwent PTED surgery for lumbar disc herniation from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, at Binhai New District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The patients were categorized into the LP group (n=43) and the PP group (n=42) according to the different positions when they underwent PTED surgery. The demographic data, preoperative data, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, operative duration time, length of postoperative hospital stay, VAS scores, lumbar JOA scores, complications, and patient satisfaction were all compared between the 2 groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>PP in PTED reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy times and operative duration compared with LP. The mean intraoperative fluoroscopy times for the 42 patients in the PP group were 7.52 (SD: 1.79) compared with 12.26 (SD: 2.11) for 43 patients in the LP group, a statistically significant difference (95% CI: 3.88-5.59, P<0.001). The mean operative duration time was 84.16 minutes (SD: 11.67) in the PP group and 76.48 minutes (SD: 8.77) in the LP group, with a statistically significant difference (95% CI: 9.17- 18.21, P<0.001). Forty-one patients in the PP group (97.62%) and 38 patients in the PP group (88.37%) were satisfied with the surgery (P=0.027). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the length of postoperative hospital stay, complications, postoperative VAS scores (1 d, 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo) and postoperative JOA scores (1 wk, 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PTED performed in the PP has fewer fluoroscopy times, shorter operative duration, and higher satisfaction with postoperative rehabilitation after the surgery. No difference existed in postoperative recovery between the 2 groups. However, more studies are needed to further evaluate the effect of surgical position on surgery and clinical outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Spine Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001875\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000001875","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究设计:回顾性单中心研究。目的:探讨不同手术体位对经皮经椎间孔内镜椎间盘切除术(PTED)临床疗效及患者满意度的影响。背景资料摘要:侧卧位(LP)与俯卧位(PP)对PTED疗效和患者满意度的影响尚未完全调查。方法:本研究纳入2021年1月1日至2023年12月31日在滨海新区中医医院行PTED手术治疗腰椎间盘突出症的85例患者。根据PTED手术时体位的不同,将患者分为LP组(n=43)和PP组(n=42)。比较两组患者的人口学资料、术前资料、术中透视次数、手术时间、术后住院时间、VAS评分、腰椎JOA评分、并发症及患者满意度。结果:与LP相比,PP可减少PTED术中透视次数和手术时间。PP组42例患者平均术中透视次数为7.52次(SD: 1.79), LP组43例患者平均术中透视次数为12.26次(SD: 2.11),差异有统计学意义(95% CI: 3.88 ~ 5.59)。结论:PP组行PTED术中透视次数少,手术时间短,术后康复满意度高。两组术后恢复无差异。然而,需要更多的研究来进一步评估手术体位对手术和临床结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Does Surgical Position Affect Percutaneous Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy Outcomes and Patient Satisfaction: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Study design: A retrospective, single-center study.

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effects of different surgical positions on clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction of percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED).

Summary of background data: The effect of lateral position (LP) versus prone position (PP) on PTED efficacy and patient satisfaction has not been entirely investigated.

Methods: This study includes 85 patients who underwent PTED surgery for lumbar disc herniation from January 1, 2021, to December 31, 2023, at Binhai New District Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine. The patients were categorized into the LP group (n=43) and the PP group (n=42) according to the different positions when they underwent PTED surgery. The demographic data, preoperative data, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, operative duration time, length of postoperative hospital stay, VAS scores, lumbar JOA scores, complications, and patient satisfaction were all compared between the 2 groups.

Results: PP in PTED reduced intraoperative fluoroscopy times and operative duration compared with LP. The mean intraoperative fluoroscopy times for the 42 patients in the PP group were 7.52 (SD: 1.79) compared with 12.26 (SD: 2.11) for 43 patients in the LP group, a statistically significant difference (95% CI: 3.88-5.59, P<0.001). The mean operative duration time was 84.16 minutes (SD: 11.67) in the PP group and 76.48 minutes (SD: 8.77) in the LP group, with a statistically significant difference (95% CI: 9.17- 18.21, P<0.001). Forty-one patients in the PP group (97.62%) and 38 patients in the PP group (88.37%) were satisfied with the surgery (P=0.027). There were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the length of postoperative hospital stay, complications, postoperative VAS scores (1 d, 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo) and postoperative JOA scores (1 wk, 1 mo, 3 mo, 6 mo).

Conclusion: PTED performed in the PP has fewer fluoroscopy times, shorter operative duration, and higher satisfaction with postoperative rehabilitation after the surgery. No difference existed in postoperative recovery between the 2 groups. However, more studies are needed to further evaluate the effect of surgical position on surgery and clinical outcomes.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Spine Surgery
Clinical Spine Surgery Medicine-Surgery
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
5.30%
发文量
236
期刊介绍: Clinical Spine Surgery is the ideal journal for the busy practicing spine surgeon or trainee, as it is the only journal necessary to keep up to date with new clinical research and surgical techniques. Readers get to watch leaders in the field debate controversial topics in a new controversies section, and gain access to evidence-based reviews of important pathologies in the systematic reviews section. The journal features a surgical technique complete with a video, and a tips and tricks section that allows surgeons to review the important steps prior to a complex procedure. Clinical Spine Surgery provides readers with primary research studies, specifically level 1, 2 and 3 studies, ensuring that articles that may actually change a surgeon’s practice will be read and published. Each issue includes a brief article that will help a surgeon better understand the business of healthcare, as well as an article that will help a surgeon understand how to interpret increasingly complex research methodology. Clinical Spine Surgery is your single source for up-to-date, evidence-based recommendations for spine care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信