Meng Qi, Yiting Huang, Runru Mai, Zhaoxian Yan, Biyun Xu, Bo Liu, Yue Zhang
{"title":"基础前脑-皮质回路的基线功能连通性预测taVNS治疗原发性失眠的反应:一项随机对照试验和fMRI研究。","authors":"Meng Qi, Yiting Huang, Runru Mai, Zhaoxian Yan, Biyun Xu, Bo Liu, Yue Zhang","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-04126-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysfunctional basal forebrain (BF) connectivity contributes to primary insomnia (PI). This study investigated whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) modulates BF functional connectivity (FC) in patients with PI and whether baseline FC predicts taVNS treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients with PI were randomized to real or sham taVNS for 4 weeks. Clinical assessments-including Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI], Insomnia Severity Index (ISI] and Zung's Self-Rating Anxiety (SAS], and Depression Scale (SDS)-and resting-state fMRI data were collected at baseline and after treatment. FC of the bilateral BF subregions (Ch_123, Ch_4) was analyzed, and pre-to-post intervention changes in FC and clinical scores were compared between groups. Baseline FC was used to predict treatment response using a support vector regression (SVR) model, validated on an independent dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven patients completed the study (33 real taVNS, 34 sham taVNS). Changes in clinical outcomes showed that real taVNS significantly reduce PSQI, ISI, and SAS scores compared to sham. FC analysis revealed reduced connectivity between bilateral BF and areas involved in visual (superior occipital gyrus, SOG; middle occipital gyrus, MOG; fusiform gyrus, FFG), somatosensory (supplementary motor area, SMA) cortex and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) after taVNS treatment. Reduced FC between bilateral BF and left MOG correlated positively with ISI improvement (r = 0.490, p = 0.008, Bonferroni correction). The SVR model effectively predicted treatment response based on BF-visual circuit connectivity (r = 0.520, p = 0.0014, 5000 permutation test) and generalized well to an independent dataset (r = 0.443, p = 0.0354, 5000 permutation test).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that taVNS may alleviate symptoms of primary insomnia through modulation of basal forebrain connectivity with visual, sensorimotor, and medial prefrontal cortical regions. Preliminary investigations indicate that baseline functional connectivity in the BF-visual circuit could represent a candidate biomarker for taVNS response, potentially informing personalized treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry (Clinical Trial No. ChiCTR1900022535).</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"412"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Baseline functional connectivity of the basal forebrain-cortical circuit predict taVNS treatment response in primary insomnia: a randomized controlled trial and fMRI study.\",\"authors\":\"Meng Qi, Yiting Huang, Runru Mai, Zhaoxian Yan, Biyun Xu, Bo Liu, Yue Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12916-025-04126-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Dysfunctional basal forebrain (BF) connectivity contributes to primary insomnia (PI). This study investigated whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) modulates BF functional connectivity (FC) in patients with PI and whether baseline FC predicts taVNS treatment response.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Seventy patients with PI were randomized to real or sham taVNS for 4 weeks. Clinical assessments-including Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI], Insomnia Severity Index (ISI] and Zung's Self-Rating Anxiety (SAS], and Depression Scale (SDS)-and resting-state fMRI data were collected at baseline and after treatment. FC of the bilateral BF subregions (Ch_123, Ch_4) was analyzed, and pre-to-post intervention changes in FC and clinical scores were compared between groups. Baseline FC was used to predict treatment response using a support vector regression (SVR) model, validated on an independent dataset.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-seven patients completed the study (33 real taVNS, 34 sham taVNS). Changes in clinical outcomes showed that real taVNS significantly reduce PSQI, ISI, and SAS scores compared to sham. FC analysis revealed reduced connectivity between bilateral BF and areas involved in visual (superior occipital gyrus, SOG; middle occipital gyrus, MOG; fusiform gyrus, FFG), somatosensory (supplementary motor area, SMA) cortex and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) after taVNS treatment. Reduced FC between bilateral BF and left MOG correlated positively with ISI improvement (r = 0.490, p = 0.008, Bonferroni correction). The SVR model effectively predicted treatment response based on BF-visual circuit connectivity (r = 0.520, p = 0.0014, 5000 permutation test) and generalized well to an independent dataset (r = 0.443, p = 0.0354, 5000 permutation test).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that taVNS may alleviate symptoms of primary insomnia through modulation of basal forebrain connectivity with visual, sensorimotor, and medial prefrontal cortical regions. Preliminary investigations indicate that baseline functional connectivity in the BF-visual circuit could represent a candidate biomarker for taVNS response, potentially informing personalized treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>The study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry (Clinical Trial No. ChiCTR1900022535).</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239473/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04126-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-04126-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:基底前脑(BF)连接功能障碍导致原发性失眠(PI)。本研究探讨经皮耳迷走神经刺激(taVNS)是否调节PI患者BF功能连接(FC),以及基线FC是否预测taVNS治疗反应。方法:将70例PI患者随机分为真taVNS组和假taVNS组,治疗4周。临床评估包括匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)、失眠严重指数(ISI)、Zung焦虑自评量表(SAS)和抑郁量表(SDS)以及静息状态功能磁共振成像(fMRI)数据在基线和治疗后收集。分析双侧BF分区(Ch_123, Ch_4) FC,比较干预前后两组FC及临床评分的变化。基线FC使用支持向量回归(SVR)模型预测治疗反应,并在独立数据集上进行验证。结果:67例患者完成了研究(33例真taVNS, 34例假taVNS)。临床结果的变化表明,与假手术相比,真正的taVNS显著降低了PSQI、ISI和SAS评分。FC分析显示双侧BF与视觉相关区域(枕上回,SOG;枕中回;fusiform gyrus, FFG),体感觉(辅助运动区,SMA)皮质和内侧前额叶皮质(mPFC)。双侧BF和左侧MOG之间FC减少与ISI改善呈正相关(r = 0.490, p = 0.008, Bonferroni校正)。SVR模型基于bf -视觉回路连通性有效预测治疗反应(r = 0.520, p = 0.0014, 5000个排列检验),并且可以很好地推广到独立数据集(r = 0.443, p = 0.03554, 5000个排列检验)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,taVNS可能通过调节基底前脑与视觉、感觉运动和内侧前额皮质区的连通性来缓解原发性失眠症状。初步研究表明,bf -视觉回路的基线功能连通性可能代表taVNS反应的候选生物标志物,可能为个性化治疗策略提供信息。试验注册:本研究已在中国临床试验注册中心注册(临床试验号:ChiCTR1900022535)。
Baseline functional connectivity of the basal forebrain-cortical circuit predict taVNS treatment response in primary insomnia: a randomized controlled trial and fMRI study.
Background: Dysfunctional basal forebrain (BF) connectivity contributes to primary insomnia (PI). This study investigated whether transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) modulates BF functional connectivity (FC) in patients with PI and whether baseline FC predicts taVNS treatment response.
Methods: Seventy patients with PI were randomized to real or sham taVNS for 4 weeks. Clinical assessments-including Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI], Insomnia Severity Index (ISI] and Zung's Self-Rating Anxiety (SAS], and Depression Scale (SDS)-and resting-state fMRI data were collected at baseline and after treatment. FC of the bilateral BF subregions (Ch_123, Ch_4) was analyzed, and pre-to-post intervention changes in FC and clinical scores were compared between groups. Baseline FC was used to predict treatment response using a support vector regression (SVR) model, validated on an independent dataset.
Results: Sixty-seven patients completed the study (33 real taVNS, 34 sham taVNS). Changes in clinical outcomes showed that real taVNS significantly reduce PSQI, ISI, and SAS scores compared to sham. FC analysis revealed reduced connectivity between bilateral BF and areas involved in visual (superior occipital gyrus, SOG; middle occipital gyrus, MOG; fusiform gyrus, FFG), somatosensory (supplementary motor area, SMA) cortex and medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC) after taVNS treatment. Reduced FC between bilateral BF and left MOG correlated positively with ISI improvement (r = 0.490, p = 0.008, Bonferroni correction). The SVR model effectively predicted treatment response based on BF-visual circuit connectivity (r = 0.520, p = 0.0014, 5000 permutation test) and generalized well to an independent dataset (r = 0.443, p = 0.0354, 5000 permutation test).
Conclusions: Our findings suggest that taVNS may alleviate symptoms of primary insomnia through modulation of basal forebrain connectivity with visual, sensorimotor, and medial prefrontal cortical regions. Preliminary investigations indicate that baseline functional connectivity in the BF-visual circuit could represent a candidate biomarker for taVNS response, potentially informing personalized treatment strategies.
Trial registration: The study was registered with the China Clinical Trial Registry (Clinical Trial No. ChiCTR1900022535).
期刊介绍:
BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.