Estela Blanco, Johanna Acevedo, Liliana Pérez, Marian Herrera, Viviana Durán, Teresa Barlaro, Rodrigo Meza, Juan Carlos Roa, Roxana Parra, Hugo Benitez, Molly E Schwalb, Craig Steinmaus, Catterina Ferreccio
{"title":"饮用水中的砷与乳腺癌:一项来自智利北部高暴露地区的病例对照研究。","authors":"Estela Blanco, Johanna Acevedo, Liliana Pérez, Marian Herrera, Viviana Durán, Teresa Barlaro, Rodrigo Meza, Juan Carlos Roa, Roxana Parra, Hugo Benitez, Molly E Schwalb, Craig Steinmaus, Catterina Ferreccio","doi":"10.1007/s10549-025-07765-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exposure to arsenic in drinking water is a cause of lung, bladder, and skin cancer, however the relation between arsenic and breast cancer is unclear. Northern Chile had high levels of arsenic in drinking water (up to 900 µg/l) between 1950 and 1970, facilitating the study of outcomes with long latency. We conducted a breast cancer case-control study in Northern Chile (2014-2018) and analyzed 505 incident breast cancer cases and 409 population-based female controls with data collected on lifetime exposure to arsenic and potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified cases in collaboration with cancer committees, hospitals, and medical facilities in the study area. Controls were recruited from the Chile Voter Registry. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between arsenic exposure and breast cancer adjusting for education and age. We evaluated cumulative, lifetime average and highest single year exposure with tertiles and quartiles and population weighted controls based on age and region of residence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure levels were high in both cases and controls, with median (interquartile range) values of: 52 (15-84) and 42 (10-106) μg/L for average lifetime concentration, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for tertile of cumulative exposure to arsenic concentrations in water (< 1.17, 1.17-5.16, and ≥ 5.17 mg) were 1.00, 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-1.18], and 1.10 (0.79-1.55). Results were similar for lifetime average and single-highest year exposure metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find evidence of increased odds of higher arsenic exposure among incident breast cancer cases compared to female population controls.</p>","PeriodicalId":9133,"journal":{"name":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","volume":" ","pages":"127-135"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arsenic in drinking water and breast cancer: a case-control study from a high exposure area in Northern Chile.\",\"authors\":\"Estela Blanco, Johanna Acevedo, Liliana Pérez, Marian Herrera, Viviana Durán, Teresa Barlaro, Rodrigo Meza, Juan Carlos Roa, Roxana Parra, Hugo Benitez, Molly E Schwalb, Craig Steinmaus, Catterina Ferreccio\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10549-025-07765-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Exposure to arsenic in drinking water is a cause of lung, bladder, and skin cancer, however the relation between arsenic and breast cancer is unclear. Northern Chile had high levels of arsenic in drinking water (up to 900 µg/l) between 1950 and 1970, facilitating the study of outcomes with long latency. We conducted a breast cancer case-control study in Northern Chile (2014-2018) and analyzed 505 incident breast cancer cases and 409 population-based female controls with data collected on lifetime exposure to arsenic and potential confounders.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We identified cases in collaboration with cancer committees, hospitals, and medical facilities in the study area. Controls were recruited from the Chile Voter Registry. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between arsenic exposure and breast cancer adjusting for education and age. We evaluated cumulative, lifetime average and highest single year exposure with tertiles and quartiles and population weighted controls based on age and region of residence.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Exposure levels were high in both cases and controls, with median (interquartile range) values of: 52 (15-84) and 42 (10-106) μg/L for average lifetime concentration, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for tertile of cumulative exposure to arsenic concentrations in water (< 1.17, 1.17-5.16, and ≥ 5.17 mg) were 1.00, 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-1.18], and 1.10 (0.79-1.55). Results were similar for lifetime average and single-highest year exposure metrics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We did not find evidence of increased odds of higher arsenic exposure among incident breast cancer cases compared to female population controls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"127-135\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07765-9\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Breast Cancer Research and Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-025-07765-9","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Arsenic in drinking water and breast cancer: a case-control study from a high exposure area in Northern Chile.
Purpose: Exposure to arsenic in drinking water is a cause of lung, bladder, and skin cancer, however the relation between arsenic and breast cancer is unclear. Northern Chile had high levels of arsenic in drinking water (up to 900 µg/l) between 1950 and 1970, facilitating the study of outcomes with long latency. We conducted a breast cancer case-control study in Northern Chile (2014-2018) and analyzed 505 incident breast cancer cases and 409 population-based female controls with data collected on lifetime exposure to arsenic and potential confounders.
Methods: We identified cases in collaboration with cancer committees, hospitals, and medical facilities in the study area. Controls were recruited from the Chile Voter Registry. Logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between arsenic exposure and breast cancer adjusting for education and age. We evaluated cumulative, lifetime average and highest single year exposure with tertiles and quartiles and population weighted controls based on age and region of residence.
Results: Exposure levels were high in both cases and controls, with median (interquartile range) values of: 52 (15-84) and 42 (10-106) μg/L for average lifetime concentration, respectively. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) for tertile of cumulative exposure to arsenic concentrations in water (< 1.17, 1.17-5.16, and ≥ 5.17 mg) were 1.00, 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.60-1.18], and 1.10 (0.79-1.55). Results were similar for lifetime average and single-highest year exposure metrics.
Conclusion: We did not find evidence of increased odds of higher arsenic exposure among incident breast cancer cases compared to female population controls.
期刊介绍:
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment provides the surgeon, radiotherapist, medical oncologist, endocrinologist, epidemiologist, immunologist or cell biologist investigating problems in breast cancer a single forum for communication. The journal creates a "market place" for breast cancer topics which cuts across all the usual lines of disciplines, providing a site for presenting pertinent investigations, and for discussing critical questions relevant to the entire field. It seeks to develop a new focus and new perspectives for all those concerned with breast cancer.