实施药物审查以优化瑞士养老院药物的使用:一项混合方法研究。

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Stephanie Mena, Julie Dubois, Marie Schneider, Anne Niquille
{"title":"实施药物审查以优化瑞士养老院药物的使用:一项混合方法研究。","authors":"Stephanie Mena, Julie Dubois, Marie Schneider, Anne Niquille","doi":"10.1186/s12913-025-13042-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polypharmacy, can cause drug related problems (DRPs), including the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Services such as medication reviews (MRs) have been initiated to address DRPs and PIMs, but their implementation remains underreported. In 2021 and 2022, a pilot project was developed with the goal of reorganizing the care of a pharmacy service to introduce a patient-centered, interprofessional MR service. The project, Medication Reviews in Nursing Homes (MRNH), took place in 10 Swiss nursing homes (NHs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation and impact of the MRNH project in order to gain a better understanding of the processes involved in implementing MR in nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study followed a Type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design using quantitative and qualitative analyses. Relevant implementation outcomes were defined through the Framework for the Implementation of Services in Pharmacy (FISpH) and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance RE-AIM framework. Data were collected via questionnaires, focus groups and administrative records. The study evaluates factors and strategies related to the implementation of MRs and assesses the impact of MRs based on the proportion of resolved DRPs at a four-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The target was for each NH to perform MRs for 10% of the NHs population. Seven of the NHs achieved this goal, which results in 55 MRs presented of a theoretical total of 75. Following interprofessional team discussions, treatment plans including 145 modifications were created, of which 128 were effectively implemented. As 120 of them were maintained at follow-up, MRs performed lead to a 83% of a partial or complete resolution of the DRPs detected (CI: 74.5-90.7%; 43 MRs). Implementation strategies were considered as useful by HCPs, including pharmacist training, clinical support and audit & feedback and defining their own sub-process. Seven of 10 participating NHs continued MRs after MRNH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of MRs in NHs was successful in seven of the 10 participating NHs. The service was considered feasible and accepted, and its dissemination was recommended by the participating healthcare professionals. The results of the study support the decision of the regional health department to extend the service to more NHs and may help identify strategies to further sustain its implementation.</p>","PeriodicalId":9012,"journal":{"name":"BMC Health Services Research","volume":"25 1","pages":"943"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239413/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of medication reviews to optimize the use of medications in Swiss nursing homes: a mixed-methods study.\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie Mena, Julie Dubois, Marie Schneider, Anne Niquille\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12913-025-13042-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Polypharmacy, can cause drug related problems (DRPs), including the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Services such as medication reviews (MRs) have been initiated to address DRPs and PIMs, but their implementation remains underreported. In 2021 and 2022, a pilot project was developed with the goal of reorganizing the care of a pharmacy service to introduce a patient-centered, interprofessional MR service. The project, Medication Reviews in Nursing Homes (MRNH), took place in 10 Swiss nursing homes (NHs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation and impact of the MRNH project in order to gain a better understanding of the processes involved in implementing MR in nursing homes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This observational study followed a Type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design using quantitative and qualitative analyses. Relevant implementation outcomes were defined through the Framework for the Implementation of Services in Pharmacy (FISpH) and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance RE-AIM framework. Data were collected via questionnaires, focus groups and administrative records. The study evaluates factors and strategies related to the implementation of MRs and assesses the impact of MRs based on the proportion of resolved DRPs at a four-month follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The target was for each NH to perform MRs for 10% of the NHs population. Seven of the NHs achieved this goal, which results in 55 MRs presented of a theoretical total of 75. Following interprofessional team discussions, treatment plans including 145 modifications were created, of which 128 were effectively implemented. As 120 of them were maintained at follow-up, MRs performed lead to a 83% of a partial or complete resolution of the DRPs detected (CI: 74.5-90.7%; 43 MRs). Implementation strategies were considered as useful by HCPs, including pharmacist training, clinical support and audit & feedback and defining their own sub-process. Seven of 10 participating NHs continued MRs after MRNH.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The implementation of MRs in NHs was successful in seven of the 10 participating NHs. The service was considered feasible and accepted, and its dissemination was recommended by the participating healthcare professionals. The results of the study support the decision of the regional health department to extend the service to more NHs and may help identify strategies to further sustain its implementation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9012,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12239413/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Health Services Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13042-8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Health Services Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-025-13042-8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:多种用药可导致药物相关问题(DRPs),包括使用潜在不适当的药物(pim)。已经启动了诸如药物审查(MRs)之类的服务,以解决drp和pim问题,但其实施情况仍未得到充分报道。在2021年和2022年,开发了一个试点项目,其目标是重组药房服务的护理,以引入以患者为中心的跨专业MR服务。该项目名为“养老院药物审查”(MRNH),在瑞士10家养老院(NHs)开展。本研究的目的是评估MRNH项目的实施和影响,以便更好地了解在养老院实施MR的过程。方法:本观察性研究采用3型实施-效果混合设计,采用定量和定性分析。相关的实施结果是通过药房服务实施框架(FISpH)和Reach、Effectiveness、Adoption、implementation、Maintenance RE-AIM框架来定义的。通过问卷调查、焦点小组和行政记录收集数据。该研究评估了与实施mr相关的因素和策略,并根据四个月随访中解决drp的比例评估mr的影响。结果:目标是每个NH为10%的NHs人口执行MRs。七个NHs实现了这一目标,这导致55个MRs的理论总数为75。经过跨专业团队讨论,制定了包括145项修改的治疗计划,其中128项得到有效实施。由于其中120例在随访中得到维持,MRs导致83%的DRPs检测部分或完全解决(CI: 74.5-90.7%;43岁的夫人)。HCPs认为实施策略是有用的,包括药师培训、临床支持、审计和反馈以及定义自己的子流程。参与NHs的10人中有7人在MRNH后继续进行MRs。结论:在10个参与的NHs中,有7个成功实施了MRs。参与的医护专业人员认为这项服务是可行和可接受的,并建议推广这项服务。这项研究的结果支持了地区卫生部门将这项服务扩大到更多国家医疗服务体系的决定,并可能有助于确定进一步维持其实施的战略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of medication reviews to optimize the use of medications in Swiss nursing homes: a mixed-methods study.

Background: Polypharmacy, can cause drug related problems (DRPs), including the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Services such as medication reviews (MRs) have been initiated to address DRPs and PIMs, but their implementation remains underreported. In 2021 and 2022, a pilot project was developed with the goal of reorganizing the care of a pharmacy service to introduce a patient-centered, interprofessional MR service. The project, Medication Reviews in Nursing Homes (MRNH), took place in 10 Swiss nursing homes (NHs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation and impact of the MRNH project in order to gain a better understanding of the processes involved in implementing MR in nursing homes.

Methods: This observational study followed a Type 3 hybrid implementation-effectiveness design using quantitative and qualitative analyses. Relevant implementation outcomes were defined through the Framework for the Implementation of Services in Pharmacy (FISpH) and the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance RE-AIM framework. Data were collected via questionnaires, focus groups and administrative records. The study evaluates factors and strategies related to the implementation of MRs and assesses the impact of MRs based on the proportion of resolved DRPs at a four-month follow-up.

Results: The target was for each NH to perform MRs for 10% of the NHs population. Seven of the NHs achieved this goal, which results in 55 MRs presented of a theoretical total of 75. Following interprofessional team discussions, treatment plans including 145 modifications were created, of which 128 were effectively implemented. As 120 of them were maintained at follow-up, MRs performed lead to a 83% of a partial or complete resolution of the DRPs detected (CI: 74.5-90.7%; 43 MRs). Implementation strategies were considered as useful by HCPs, including pharmacist training, clinical support and audit & feedback and defining their own sub-process. Seven of 10 participating NHs continued MRs after MRNH.

Conclusions: The implementation of MRs in NHs was successful in seven of the 10 participating NHs. The service was considered feasible and accepted, and its dissemination was recommended by the participating healthcare professionals. The results of the study support the decision of the regional health department to extend the service to more NHs and may help identify strategies to further sustain its implementation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Health Services Research
BMC Health Services Research 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
1372
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: BMC Health Services Research is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on all aspects of health services research, including delivery of care, management of health services, assessment of healthcare needs, measurement of outcomes, allocation of healthcare resources, evaluation of different health markets and health services organizations, international comparative analysis of health systems, health economics and the impact of health policies and regulations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信