微创和标准后路全髋关节置换术治疗Crowe 2型发育不良髋关节的比较:临床、影像学和功能结果

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Mehmet Faruk Çatma, Sinan Yüksel, Mustafa Kemal Yenidünya, Orhan Kunu, İbrahim Faruk Adıgüzel, Önder Ersan
{"title":"微创和标准后路全髋关节置换术治疗Crowe 2型发育不良髋关节的比较:临床、影像学和功能结果","authors":"Mehmet Faruk Çatma, Sinan Yüksel, Mustafa Kemal Yenidünya, Orhan Kunu, İbrahim Faruk Adıgüzel, Önder Ersan","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-05965-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The debate continues regarding the advantages of minimally invasive techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to standard approaches. However, data on the use of minimally invasive approaches in dysplastic hips are limited. This study aims to compare the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and standard surgery (SS) techniques in THA for Crowe type 2 dysplastic hips.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study included 48 patients with Crowe type 2 dysplastic coxarthrosis who underwent primary THA between November 2022 and January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the incision technique: MIS (n = 22) and SS (n = 23). Demographic data, intraoperative variables, and complications were recorded. Clinical evaluation included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Joint Position Sense (JPS) test at 3 months and 1-year follow-up. Radiological assessment involved component positioning, femoral offset, and leg length discrepancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MIS group demonstrated significantly shorter incision length (8.5 cm vs. 14 cm; p < 0.001), reduced intraoperative blood loss (223.9 ml vs. 281.7 ml; p < 0.05), and shorter operative time (49.9 min vs. 58.8 min; p < 0.05) compared to the SS group. Both groups showed significant improvement in HHS at 3 months and 1-year follow-up. Early postoperative HHS, BBS, and JPS scores were significantly better in the MIS group at 3 months (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed between groups at 1-year follow-up. Radiological parameters, including component positioning and leg length discrepancy, were similar between groups, except for femoral offset, which was higher in the MIS group. No major complications, including dislocation, infection, or nerve injury, were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MIS posterior approach in THA for Crowe type 2 dysplastic hips is a safe and effective technique providing advantages of reduced blood loss, shorter operative time, and smaller incision without component malposition or increased complication rates. Although early functional outcomes were better in the MIS group, the 1-year results were similar between the two techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":"368"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of minimally invasive and standard posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type 2 dysplastic coxarthrosis: clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes.\",\"authors\":\"Mehmet Faruk Çatma, Sinan Yüksel, Mustafa Kemal Yenidünya, Orhan Kunu, İbrahim Faruk Adıgüzel, Önder Ersan\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00402-025-05965-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The debate continues regarding the advantages of minimally invasive techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to standard approaches. However, data on the use of minimally invasive approaches in dysplastic hips are limited. This study aims to compare the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and standard surgery (SS) techniques in THA for Crowe type 2 dysplastic hips.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This retrospective, single-center study included 48 patients with Crowe type 2 dysplastic coxarthrosis who underwent primary THA between November 2022 and January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the incision technique: MIS (n = 22) and SS (n = 23). Demographic data, intraoperative variables, and complications were recorded. Clinical evaluation included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Joint Position Sense (JPS) test at 3 months and 1-year follow-up. Radiological assessment involved component positioning, femoral offset, and leg length discrepancy.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The MIS group demonstrated significantly shorter incision length (8.5 cm vs. 14 cm; p < 0.001), reduced intraoperative blood loss (223.9 ml vs. 281.7 ml; p < 0.05), and shorter operative time (49.9 min vs. 58.8 min; p < 0.05) compared to the SS group. Both groups showed significant improvement in HHS at 3 months and 1-year follow-up. Early postoperative HHS, BBS, and JPS scores were significantly better in the MIS group at 3 months (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed between groups at 1-year follow-up. Radiological parameters, including component positioning and leg length discrepancy, were similar between groups, except for femoral offset, which was higher in the MIS group. No major complications, including dislocation, infection, or nerve injury, were observed in either group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The MIS posterior approach in THA for Crowe type 2 dysplastic hips is a safe and effective technique providing advantages of reduced blood loss, shorter operative time, and smaller incision without component malposition or increased complication rates. Although early functional outcomes were better in the MIS group, the 1-year results were similar between the two techniques.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8326,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"volume\":\"145 1\",\"pages\":\"368\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05965-y\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ORTHOPEDICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-025-05965-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

引言:与标准入路相比,微创技术在全髋关节置换术(THA)中的优势仍在继续争论。然而,使用微创入路治疗发育不良髋关节的数据有限。本研究旨在比较微创手术(MIS)和标准手术(SS)技术治疗Crowe 2型发育不良髋关节的临床、放射学和功能结果。材料和方法:这项回顾性、单中心研究纳入了48例Crowe 2型发育不良关节病患者,这些患者在2022年11月至2024年1月期间接受了原发性THA手术。根据切口技术将患者分为两组:MIS组(22例)和SS组(23例)。记录人口统计数据、术中变量和并发症。临床评价包括Harris髋关节评分(HHS)、Berg平衡量表(BBS)和关节体位感(JPS)测试,随访3个月和1年。放射学评估包括假体定位、股骨偏移和腿长差异。结果:MIS组切口长度明显缩短(8.5 cm vs. 14 cm;结论:MIS后路入路THA治疗Crowe 2型发育不良髋关节是一种安全有效的技术,具有出血量少、手术时间短、切口小、无假体错位或并发症增加等优点。虽然MIS组的早期功能结果更好,但两种技术的1年结果相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of minimally invasive and standard posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type 2 dysplastic coxarthrosis: clinical, radiographic, and functional outcomes.

Introduction: The debate continues regarding the advantages of minimally invasive techniques in total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to standard approaches. However, data on the use of minimally invasive approaches in dysplastic hips are limited. This study aims to compare the clinical, radiological, and functional outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and standard surgery (SS) techniques in THA for Crowe type 2 dysplastic hips.

Materials and methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 48 patients with Crowe type 2 dysplastic coxarthrosis who underwent primary THA between November 2022 and January 2024. Patients were divided into two groups based on the incision technique: MIS (n = 22) and SS (n = 23). Demographic data, intraoperative variables, and complications were recorded. Clinical evaluation included the Harris Hip Score (HHS), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), and Joint Position Sense (JPS) test at 3 months and 1-year follow-up. Radiological assessment involved component positioning, femoral offset, and leg length discrepancy.

Results: The MIS group demonstrated significantly shorter incision length (8.5 cm vs. 14 cm; p < 0.001), reduced intraoperative blood loss (223.9 ml vs. 281.7 ml; p < 0.05), and shorter operative time (49.9 min vs. 58.8 min; p < 0.05) compared to the SS group. Both groups showed significant improvement in HHS at 3 months and 1-year follow-up. Early postoperative HHS, BBS, and JPS scores were significantly better in the MIS group at 3 months (p < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed between groups at 1-year follow-up. Radiological parameters, including component positioning and leg length discrepancy, were similar between groups, except for femoral offset, which was higher in the MIS group. No major complications, including dislocation, infection, or nerve injury, were observed in either group.

Conclusions: The MIS posterior approach in THA for Crowe type 2 dysplastic hips is a safe and effective technique providing advantages of reduced blood loss, shorter operative time, and smaller incision without component malposition or increased complication rates. Although early functional outcomes were better in the MIS group, the 1-year results were similar between the two techniques.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信