澳大利亚重症监护患者参与姑息治疗的四年回顾性研究。

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Mark P Collins, Patrick Steele, Lewis Hackenberger, Christopher MacIsaac, Jeffrey Presneill
{"title":"澳大利亚重症监护患者参与姑息治疗的四年回顾性研究。","authors":"Mark P Collins, Patrick Steele, Lewis Hackenberger, Christopher MacIsaac, Jeffrey Presneill","doi":"10.1177/0310057X251334659","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This study aimed to characterise specialist palliative care service involvement within the intensive care unit (ICU) and subsequently in post-ICU hospital wards, and compare current ICU referral practices with those suggested by an internationally utilised ICU palliative care referral tool. This was a retrospective cohort study, carried out at a large university-associated ICU in Melbourne, Australia, and was conducted on adult patients aged at least 18 years admitted to ICU between July 2019 and July 2023. The study included 11,449 ICU admission episodes relating to 10,171 patients. The overall ICU mortality for all patients was 9% in ICU with a further 4.3% post-ICU. Within non-survivors, specialist palliative care involvement was uncommon for patients who died in ICU (78/1035, 7.5%), but substantial (287/488, 59%) for those ICU patients who died on a hospital ward after ICU discharge. Compared with ICU patients who did not have an identified palliative care referral, ICU patients with palliative care input averaged longer ICU stays with shorter hospital stays post-ICU discharge. The referral tool showed low sensitivity (39%) when compared with observed current ICU palliative care referral practice. Clinical staff within the ICU provided the majority of palliative care for ICU patients, with a palliative care consultative service taking a proportionally much greater role in post-ICU hospital wards. The selected criteria appeared inadequate for use as an effective referral tool. Future research may explore the quality of palliative care provided by ICU staff and specialist palliative care staff, and the role of decision support tools, so as to provide optimal care for critically ill patients approaching the end of life.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"310057X251334659"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A four-year retrospective study of palliative care involvement with Australian intensive care patients.\",\"authors\":\"Mark P Collins, Patrick Steele, Lewis Hackenberger, Christopher MacIsaac, Jeffrey Presneill\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/0310057X251334659\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This study aimed to characterise specialist palliative care service involvement within the intensive care unit (ICU) and subsequently in post-ICU hospital wards, and compare current ICU referral practices with those suggested by an internationally utilised ICU palliative care referral tool. This was a retrospective cohort study, carried out at a large university-associated ICU in Melbourne, Australia, and was conducted on adult patients aged at least 18 years admitted to ICU between July 2019 and July 2023. The study included 11,449 ICU admission episodes relating to 10,171 patients. The overall ICU mortality for all patients was 9% in ICU with a further 4.3% post-ICU. Within non-survivors, specialist palliative care involvement was uncommon for patients who died in ICU (78/1035, 7.5%), but substantial (287/488, 59%) for those ICU patients who died on a hospital ward after ICU discharge. Compared with ICU patients who did not have an identified palliative care referral, ICU patients with palliative care input averaged longer ICU stays with shorter hospital stays post-ICU discharge. The referral tool showed low sensitivity (39%) when compared with observed current ICU palliative care referral practice. Clinical staff within the ICU provided the majority of palliative care for ICU patients, with a palliative care consultative service taking a proportionally much greater role in post-ICU hospital wards. The selected criteria appeared inadequate for use as an effective referral tool. Future research may explore the quality of palliative care provided by ICU staff and specialist palliative care staff, and the role of decision support tools, so as to provide optimal care for critically ill patients approaching the end of life.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7746,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"310057X251334659\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X251334659\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X251334659","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在描述专科姑息治疗服务在重症监护室(ICU)以及随后在ICU后病房的参与情况,并将当前ICU转诊做法与国际上使用的ICU姑息治疗转诊工具所建议的做法进行比较。这是一项回顾性队列研究,在澳大利亚墨尔本的一所大型大学附属ICU进行,研究对象是2019年7月至2023年7月期间入住ICU的18岁以上成年患者。该研究包括11,449例ICU入院事件,涉及10,171例患者。所有患者的ICU总死亡率为9%,ICU后死亡率为4.3%。在非幸存者中,在ICU中死亡的患者很少参与专科姑息治疗(78/1035,7.5%),但在ICU出院后在医院病房中死亡的ICU患者参与专科姑息治疗(287/488,59%)。与没有确定姑息治疗转诊的ICU患者相比,接受姑息治疗的ICU患者平均住院时间更长,出院后住院时间更短。与目前观察到的ICU姑息治疗转诊实践相比,转诊工具的敏感性较低(39%)。ICU内的临床工作人员为ICU患者提供了大部分姑息治疗,姑息治疗咨询服务在ICU后医院病房中发挥了更大的作用。所选的标准似乎不足以作为有效的转诊工具。未来的研究可能会探讨ICU和专科姑息治疗人员提供的姑息治疗质量,以及决策支持工具的作用,从而为接近生命终点的危重患者提供最佳护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A four-year retrospective study of palliative care involvement with Australian intensive care patients.

This study aimed to characterise specialist palliative care service involvement within the intensive care unit (ICU) and subsequently in post-ICU hospital wards, and compare current ICU referral practices with those suggested by an internationally utilised ICU palliative care referral tool. This was a retrospective cohort study, carried out at a large university-associated ICU in Melbourne, Australia, and was conducted on adult patients aged at least 18 years admitted to ICU between July 2019 and July 2023. The study included 11,449 ICU admission episodes relating to 10,171 patients. The overall ICU mortality for all patients was 9% in ICU with a further 4.3% post-ICU. Within non-survivors, specialist palliative care involvement was uncommon for patients who died in ICU (78/1035, 7.5%), but substantial (287/488, 59%) for those ICU patients who died on a hospital ward after ICU discharge. Compared with ICU patients who did not have an identified palliative care referral, ICU patients with palliative care input averaged longer ICU stays with shorter hospital stays post-ICU discharge. The referral tool showed low sensitivity (39%) when compared with observed current ICU palliative care referral practice. Clinical staff within the ICU provided the majority of palliative care for ICU patients, with a palliative care consultative service taking a proportionally much greater role in post-ICU hospital wards. The selected criteria appeared inadequate for use as an effective referral tool. Future research may explore the quality of palliative care provided by ICU staff and specialist palliative care staff, and the role of decision support tools, so as to provide optimal care for critically ill patients approaching the end of life.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信