{"title":"胸肋间筋膜平面阻滞减少胸骨切开心脏手术术后阿片类药物总消耗的有效性:一项荟萃分析。","authors":"Ardyan Wardhana, Halim Sudono, Juni Kurniawaty","doi":"10.4103/aca.aca_248_24","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The pecto-intercostal fascia plane block (PIFB) is gaining recognition for its potential to reduce postoperative opioid use after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PIFB compared with conventional intravenous regimens in reducing total postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery involving sternotomy. A meta-analysis of relevant studies, published up to August 13, 2024, retrieved from the PubMed and CENTRAL databases was performed. The inclusion criteria were studies involving a superficial parasternal block or PIFB for patients undergoing cardiac surgery involving sternotomy. Studies comparing PIFB with other blocks or local anesthetic regimens were excluded. Data analysis was performed using an inverse variance random-effects model using RevMan 5.4.1 software, with the effect measure expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) to account for the different opioids used. Of 88 studies retrieved in the literature search, 16 fulfilled the inclusion criteria [ten ultrasound (US)-guided and six non-US-guided]. PIFB significantly reduced total opioid consumption [SMD -1.55 (95% CI -2.15 to -0.95); P < 0.001] and time to extubation [SMD -1.22 (95% CI -2.05 to -0.38); P < 0.001]. A subgroup analysis of multiple- versus single-shot injections yielded consistent results. Analyses including only US-guided PIFB revealed consistent reductions in total opioid consumption [SMD -1.18 (95% CI -1.79 to -0.56); P < 0.001] and time to extubation [SMD -0.82 (95% CI -1.01 to -0.63); P < 0.001]. PIFB effectively reduced opioid consumption and shortened postoperative time to extubation in cardiac surgery involving sternotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7997,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","volume":"28 3","pages":"219-227"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Pecto-Intercostal Fascia Plane Block in Reducing Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Cardiac Surgery Involving Sternotomy: A Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Ardyan Wardhana, Halim Sudono, Juni Kurniawaty\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/aca.aca_248_24\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>The pecto-intercostal fascia plane block (PIFB) is gaining recognition for its potential to reduce postoperative opioid use after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PIFB compared with conventional intravenous regimens in reducing total postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery involving sternotomy. A meta-analysis of relevant studies, published up to August 13, 2024, retrieved from the PubMed and CENTRAL databases was performed. The inclusion criteria were studies involving a superficial parasternal block or PIFB for patients undergoing cardiac surgery involving sternotomy. Studies comparing PIFB with other blocks or local anesthetic regimens were excluded. Data analysis was performed using an inverse variance random-effects model using RevMan 5.4.1 software, with the effect measure expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) to account for the different opioids used. Of 88 studies retrieved in the literature search, 16 fulfilled the inclusion criteria [ten ultrasound (US)-guided and six non-US-guided]. PIFB significantly reduced total opioid consumption [SMD -1.55 (95% CI -2.15 to -0.95); P < 0.001] and time to extubation [SMD -1.22 (95% CI -2.05 to -0.38); P < 0.001]. A subgroup analysis of multiple- versus single-shot injections yielded consistent results. Analyses including only US-guided PIFB revealed consistent reductions in total opioid consumption [SMD -1.18 (95% CI -1.79 to -0.56); P < 0.001] and time to extubation [SMD -0.82 (95% CI -1.01 to -0.63); P < 0.001]. PIFB effectively reduced opioid consumption and shortened postoperative time to extubation in cardiac surgery involving sternotomy.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7997,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"volume\":\"28 3\",\"pages\":\"219-227\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_248_24\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/8 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANESTHESIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aca.aca_248_24","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
摘要:胸肋间筋膜平面阻滞(PIFB)因其减少心脏手术后阿片类药物使用的潜力而获得认可。本研究旨在评估PIFB与传统静脉注射方案在减少胸骨切开心脏手术患者术后阿片类药物总消耗方面的有效性。对从PubMed和CENTRAL数据库中检索到的截止到2024年8月13日发表的相关研究进行荟萃分析。纳入标准是涉及胸骨切开术的心脏手术患者的浅胸骨旁阻滞或PIFB的研究。将PIFB与其他阻滞或局部麻醉方案进行比较的研究被排除在外。数据分析采用RevMan 5.4.1软件建立逆方差随机效应模型,效应测度以标准化平均差(SMD)表示,以考虑不同阿片类药物的使用。在文献检索中检索到的88项研究中,16项符合纳入标准[10项超声(超声)引导和6项非超声引导]。PIFB显著降低阿片类药物总消费量[SMD -1.55 (95% CI -2.15至-0.95);P < 0.001]和拔管时间[SMD -1.22 (95% CI -2.05 ~ -0.38);P < 0.001]。多次注射与单次注射的亚组分析结果一致。仅包括美国引导的PIFB的分析显示,阿片类药物总消费量持续下降[SMD -1.18 (95% CI -1.79至-0.56);P < 0.001]和拔管时间[SMD -0.82 (95% CI -1.01 ~ -0.63);P < 0.001]。PIFB有效减少阿片类药物消耗,缩短胸骨切开心脏手术术后拔管时间。
Effectiveness of Pecto-Intercostal Fascia Plane Block in Reducing Total Postoperative Opioid Consumption in Cardiac Surgery Involving Sternotomy: A Meta-Analysis.
Abstract: The pecto-intercostal fascia plane block (PIFB) is gaining recognition for its potential to reduce postoperative opioid use after cardiac surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PIFB compared with conventional intravenous regimens in reducing total postoperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing cardiac surgery involving sternotomy. A meta-analysis of relevant studies, published up to August 13, 2024, retrieved from the PubMed and CENTRAL databases was performed. The inclusion criteria were studies involving a superficial parasternal block or PIFB for patients undergoing cardiac surgery involving sternotomy. Studies comparing PIFB with other blocks or local anesthetic regimens were excluded. Data analysis was performed using an inverse variance random-effects model using RevMan 5.4.1 software, with the effect measure expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) to account for the different opioids used. Of 88 studies retrieved in the literature search, 16 fulfilled the inclusion criteria [ten ultrasound (US)-guided and six non-US-guided]. PIFB significantly reduced total opioid consumption [SMD -1.55 (95% CI -2.15 to -0.95); P < 0.001] and time to extubation [SMD -1.22 (95% CI -2.05 to -0.38); P < 0.001]. A subgroup analysis of multiple- versus single-shot injections yielded consistent results. Analyses including only US-guided PIFB revealed consistent reductions in total opioid consumption [SMD -1.18 (95% CI -1.79 to -0.56); P < 0.001] and time to extubation [SMD -0.82 (95% CI -1.01 to -0.63); P < 0.001]. PIFB effectively reduced opioid consumption and shortened postoperative time to extubation in cardiac surgery involving sternotomy.
期刊介绍:
Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia (ACA) is the official journal of the Indian Association of Cardiovascular Thoracic Anaesthesiologists. The journal is indexed with PubMed/MEDLINE, Excerpta Medica/EMBASE, IndMed and MedInd. The journal’s full text is online at www.annals.in. With the aim of faster and better dissemination of knowledge, we will be publishing articles ‘Ahead of Print’ immediately on acceptance. In addition, the journal would allow free access (Open Access) to its contents, which is likely to attract more readers and citations to articles published in ACA. Authors do not have to pay for submission, processing or publication of articles in ACA.