Luana P. P. Cunha, Larissa P. N. M. Pinto, Willian T. G. Novato, Hélio F. Dos Santos, Diego F. S. Paschoal
{"title":"基于dft的金(III)配合物结构和反应性建模方法","authors":"Luana P. P. Cunha, Larissa P. N. M. Pinto, Willian T. G. Novato, Hélio F. Dos Santos, Diego F. S. Paschoal","doi":"10.1002/jcc.70179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this study, distinct computational protocols were employed to investigate the structure and kinetic properties of the aquation reaction of the [Au(dien-H)Cl]<sup>+</sup> Au(III) complex. A total of 154 protocols with nonrelativistic Hamiltonians were initially assessed, comprising 31 basis sets for Au, 52 basis sets for ligand atoms, and 71 levels of theory (including HF, MP2, and 69 DFT-functionals). Additionally, seven protocols with relativistic Hamiltonians, using all-electron basis sets for Au, were evaluated. The results indicate that the structure is relatively insensitive to the computational protocol. In contrast, the activation Gibbs free energy (<span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <msubsup>\n <mrow>\n <mi>Δ</mi>\n <mi>G</mi>\n </mrow>\n <mi>aq</mi>\n <mo>‡</mo>\n </msubsup>\n </mrow>\n <annotation>$$ {\\Delta G}_{\\mathrm{aq}}^{\\ddagger } $$</annotation>\n </semantics></math>) are highly sensitive to both the level of theory and basis sets choice. Notably, the basis set used for ligand atoms plays a key role in accurately predicting kinetic parameters. Among the tested 397 combinations, the B3LYP/def2-SVP/6-31G(d,p) protocol yielded the overall best agreement with experimental data for the reference complex. However, for bulkier [Au(R-dien-H)Cl]<sup>+</sup> derivatives, diffuse functions on ligand atoms are essential, making 6-31+G(d) the recommended basis set. When all five Au(III) complexes are considered, the optimal performance is achieved using B3LYP with the Stuttgart-RSC ECP for Au and 6-31+G(d) for ligand atoms. This combination offers a good balance between accuracy and computational cost, making it a practical choice even for larger Au(III) complexes.</p>","PeriodicalId":188,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","volume":"46 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcc.70179","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A DFT-Based Protocol for Modeling the Structure and Reactivity of Gold(III) Complexes\",\"authors\":\"Luana P. P. Cunha, Larissa P. N. M. Pinto, Willian T. G. Novato, Hélio F. Dos Santos, Diego F. S. Paschoal\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jcc.70179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In this study, distinct computational protocols were employed to investigate the structure and kinetic properties of the aquation reaction of the [Au(dien-H)Cl]<sup>+</sup> Au(III) complex. A total of 154 protocols with nonrelativistic Hamiltonians were initially assessed, comprising 31 basis sets for Au, 52 basis sets for ligand atoms, and 71 levels of theory (including HF, MP2, and 69 DFT-functionals). Additionally, seven protocols with relativistic Hamiltonians, using all-electron basis sets for Au, were evaluated. The results indicate that the structure is relatively insensitive to the computational protocol. In contrast, the activation Gibbs free energy (<span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <msubsup>\\n <mrow>\\n <mi>Δ</mi>\\n <mi>G</mi>\\n </mrow>\\n <mi>aq</mi>\\n <mo>‡</mo>\\n </msubsup>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation>$$ {\\\\Delta G}_{\\\\mathrm{aq}}^{\\\\ddagger } $$</annotation>\\n </semantics></math>) are highly sensitive to both the level of theory and basis sets choice. Notably, the basis set used for ligand atoms plays a key role in accurately predicting kinetic parameters. Among the tested 397 combinations, the B3LYP/def2-SVP/6-31G(d,p) protocol yielded the overall best agreement with experimental data for the reference complex. However, for bulkier [Au(R-dien-H)Cl]<sup>+</sup> derivatives, diffuse functions on ligand atoms are essential, making 6-31+G(d) the recommended basis set. When all five Au(III) complexes are considered, the optimal performance is achieved using B3LYP with the Stuttgart-RSC ECP for Au and 6-31+G(d) for ligand atoms. This combination offers a good balance between accuracy and computational cost, making it a practical choice even for larger Au(III) complexes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Computational Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"46 19\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jcc.70179\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Computational Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.70179\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"化学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computational Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jcc.70179","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在这项研究中,采用不同的计算方案来研究[Au(dien-H)Cl]+ Au(III)配合物的水化反应的结构和动力学性质。初步评估了154种具有非相对论性哈密顿算子的方案,包括31个Au基集,52个配体原子基集和71个理论水平(包括HF, MP2和69个dft泛函)。此外,使用Au的全电子基集,对7种具有相对论性哈密顿量的协议进行了评估。结果表明,该结构对计算协议相对不敏感。相反,激活吉布斯自由能(Δ G aq‡$$ {\Delta G}_{\mathrm{aq}}^{\ddagger } $$)对理论水平和基集选择都高度敏感。值得注意的是,用于配体原子的基集在准确预测动力学参数方面起着关键作用。在测试的397个组合中,B3LYP/def2-SVP/6-31G(d,p)方案与参考复合物的实验数据总体上一致性最好。然而,对于体积较大的[Au(R-dien-H)Cl]+衍生物,配体原子上的扩散函数是必不可少的,因此6-31+G(d)是推荐的基集。当考虑所有五种Au(III)配合物时,使用B3LYP与Stuttgart-RSC ECP和6-31+G(d)配体原子获得最佳性能。这种组合在精度和计算成本之间提供了很好的平衡,使其成为即使是较大的Au(III)配合物的实用选择。
A DFT-Based Protocol for Modeling the Structure and Reactivity of Gold(III) Complexes
In this study, distinct computational protocols were employed to investigate the structure and kinetic properties of the aquation reaction of the [Au(dien-H)Cl]+ Au(III) complex. A total of 154 protocols with nonrelativistic Hamiltonians were initially assessed, comprising 31 basis sets for Au, 52 basis sets for ligand atoms, and 71 levels of theory (including HF, MP2, and 69 DFT-functionals). Additionally, seven protocols with relativistic Hamiltonians, using all-electron basis sets for Au, were evaluated. The results indicate that the structure is relatively insensitive to the computational protocol. In contrast, the activation Gibbs free energy () are highly sensitive to both the level of theory and basis sets choice. Notably, the basis set used for ligand atoms plays a key role in accurately predicting kinetic parameters. Among the tested 397 combinations, the B3LYP/def2-SVP/6-31G(d,p) protocol yielded the overall best agreement with experimental data for the reference complex. However, for bulkier [Au(R-dien-H)Cl]+ derivatives, diffuse functions on ligand atoms are essential, making 6-31+G(d) the recommended basis set. When all five Au(III) complexes are considered, the optimal performance is achieved using B3LYP with the Stuttgart-RSC ECP for Au and 6-31+G(d) for ligand atoms. This combination offers a good balance between accuracy and computational cost, making it a practical choice even for larger Au(III) complexes.
期刊介绍:
This distinguished journal publishes articles concerned with all aspects of computational chemistry: analytical, biological, inorganic, organic, physical, and materials. The Journal of Computational Chemistry presents original research, contemporary developments in theory and methodology, and state-of-the-art applications. Computational areas that are featured in the journal include ab initio and semiempirical quantum mechanics, density functional theory, molecular mechanics, molecular dynamics, statistical mechanics, cheminformatics, biomolecular structure prediction, molecular design, and bioinformatics.