{"title":"自然联系、自然接触与积极心理结果之间的关系:一项荟萃分析","authors":"Qing Zeng , Zhiying Yang , Zhiqiang Chen , Ping Chen","doi":"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Engagement with natural surroundings is essential in fostering the psychological connection between individuals and the environment, which can significantly improve people's mental health. This study adopted a comprehensive meta-analytic approach to examine the relationships between nature connectedness and nature contact, and between nature connectedness and positive psychological outcomes, respectively. In addition, the moderating effects of several variables (i.e., gender, age, geographic area, data collection method, measurement instrument, nature contact timing, and type of nature contact) were examined. The meta-analysis synthesized findings from 70 cross-sectional studies published between 2013 and 2024, comprising 68 peer-reviewed journal articles and 2 theses. The included studies exhibited considerable variation in sample sizes, ranging from 102 to 4960 participants. A three-level meta-analytic model was employed to analyze the pooled data, revealing a positive correlation between nature connectedness and nature contact. Participants with higher levels of nature connectedness exhibited greater well-being, enhanced meaning in life, and increased life satisfaction. The type of measurement instrument significantly moderated the relationship between nature connectedness and nature contact, with studies employing standardized scales reporting significantly larger effect sizes than those using single-item or question-based measures. Geographic area emerged as a significant moderator in the connection between nature connectedness, well-being, and meaning in life. Studies conducted in Asia reported larger effect sizes compared to those conducted in other regions. These findings highlight the importance of nature connectedness and its associations with both nature contact and positive psychological outcomes, offering valuable practical implications.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48439,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 102675"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relationships between nature connectedness, nature contact, and positive psychological outcomes: A meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Qing Zeng , Zhiying Yang , Zhiqiang Chen , Ping Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jenvp.2025.102675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Engagement with natural surroundings is essential in fostering the psychological connection between individuals and the environment, which can significantly improve people's mental health. This study adopted a comprehensive meta-analytic approach to examine the relationships between nature connectedness and nature contact, and between nature connectedness and positive psychological outcomes, respectively. In addition, the moderating effects of several variables (i.e., gender, age, geographic area, data collection method, measurement instrument, nature contact timing, and type of nature contact) were examined. The meta-analysis synthesized findings from 70 cross-sectional studies published between 2013 and 2024, comprising 68 peer-reviewed journal articles and 2 theses. The included studies exhibited considerable variation in sample sizes, ranging from 102 to 4960 participants. A three-level meta-analytic model was employed to analyze the pooled data, revealing a positive correlation between nature connectedness and nature contact. Participants with higher levels of nature connectedness exhibited greater well-being, enhanced meaning in life, and increased life satisfaction. The type of measurement instrument significantly moderated the relationship between nature connectedness and nature contact, with studies employing standardized scales reporting significantly larger effect sizes than those using single-item or question-based measures. Geographic area emerged as a significant moderator in the connection between nature connectedness, well-being, and meaning in life. Studies conducted in Asia reported larger effect sizes compared to those conducted in other regions. These findings highlight the importance of nature connectedness and its associations with both nature contact and positive psychological outcomes, offering valuable practical implications.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48439,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"volume\":\"105 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102675\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001586\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0272494425001586","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
The relationships between nature connectedness, nature contact, and positive psychological outcomes: A meta-analysis
Engagement with natural surroundings is essential in fostering the psychological connection between individuals and the environment, which can significantly improve people's mental health. This study adopted a comprehensive meta-analytic approach to examine the relationships between nature connectedness and nature contact, and between nature connectedness and positive psychological outcomes, respectively. In addition, the moderating effects of several variables (i.e., gender, age, geographic area, data collection method, measurement instrument, nature contact timing, and type of nature contact) were examined. The meta-analysis synthesized findings from 70 cross-sectional studies published between 2013 and 2024, comprising 68 peer-reviewed journal articles and 2 theses. The included studies exhibited considerable variation in sample sizes, ranging from 102 to 4960 participants. A three-level meta-analytic model was employed to analyze the pooled data, revealing a positive correlation between nature connectedness and nature contact. Participants with higher levels of nature connectedness exhibited greater well-being, enhanced meaning in life, and increased life satisfaction. The type of measurement instrument significantly moderated the relationship between nature connectedness and nature contact, with studies employing standardized scales reporting significantly larger effect sizes than those using single-item or question-based measures. Geographic area emerged as a significant moderator in the connection between nature connectedness, well-being, and meaning in life. Studies conducted in Asia reported larger effect sizes compared to those conducted in other regions. These findings highlight the importance of nature connectedness and its associations with both nature contact and positive psychological outcomes, offering valuable practical implications.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Environmental Psychology is the premier journal in the field, serving individuals in a wide range of disciplines who have an interest in the scientific study of the transactions and interrelationships between people and their surroundings (including built, social, natural and virtual environments, the use and abuse of nature and natural resources, and sustainability-related behavior). The journal publishes internationally contributed empirical studies and reviews of research on these topics that advance new insights. As an important forum for the field, the journal publishes some of the most influential papers in the discipline that reflect the scientific development of environmental psychology. Contributions on theoretical, methodological, and practical aspects of all human-environment interactions are welcome, along with innovative or interdisciplinary approaches that have a psychological emphasis. Research areas include: •Psychological and behavioral aspects of people and nature •Cognitive mapping, spatial cognition and wayfinding •Ecological consequences of human actions •Theories of place, place attachment, and place identity •Environmental risks and hazards: perception, behavior, and management •Perception and evaluation of buildings and natural landscapes •Effects of physical and natural settings on human cognition and health •Theories of proenvironmental behavior, norms, attitudes, and personality •Psychology of sustainability and climate change •Psychological aspects of resource management and crises •Social use of space: crowding, privacy, territoriality, personal space •Design of, and experiences related to, the physical aspects of workplaces, schools, residences, public buildings and public space