评估将非专利美沙酮引入安大略省公共药物处方的影响

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 SUBSTANCE ABUSE
Bisola Hamzat , Tianru Wang , Ria Garg , Anita Iacono , Mina Tadrous , Fangyun Wu , Jennifer Wyman , Zoë Dodd , Shauna Pinkerton , Ashley Smoke , Tara Gomes
{"title":"评估将非专利美沙酮引入安大略省公共药物处方的影响","authors":"Bisola Hamzat ,&nbsp;Tianru Wang ,&nbsp;Ria Garg ,&nbsp;Anita Iacono ,&nbsp;Mina Tadrous ,&nbsp;Fangyun Wu ,&nbsp;Jennifer Wyman ,&nbsp;Zoë Dodd ,&nbsp;Shauna Pinkerton ,&nbsp;Ashley Smoke ,&nbsp;Tara Gomes","doi":"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Two new generic methadone products—Jamp-methadone and Odan-methadone—were added to Ontario’s public drug formulary in August 2022 and listed as interchangeable with the brand-name product, Methadose®. Concerns have been raised by people receiving methadone and their prescribers about potential risks of treatment destabilization as a result of switching between methadone-containing products.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective population-based time series analysis of weekly methadone claims in Ontario, Canada between January 5, 2017, and March 31, 2023. Using interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models, we assessed the impact of the formulary listing on product market-share, maximum dose dispensed, methadone discontinuation, and opioid toxicities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The market share of Methadose® declined from 99.7 % to 52.3 % between the listing of generic methadone and March 2023, whereas generic products increased from 0.27 % to 40.0 % (Jamp-methadone) and 0.0 % to 7.7 % (Odan-methadone). We observed a significant short-term increase in the percentage of individuals dispensed methadone doses ≥130 mg (+1.30 %; 95 % CI: 0.85 %, 1.76 %) following formulary listing; however the introduction of generic methadone did not result in a significant change in methadone discontinuation among those stabilized (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.5) and not yet stabilized on treatment (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.7) or opioid-related toxicity events (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings did not indicate broad treatment destabilization or increased opioid-related toxicity among methadone recipients in the months following the introduction of generic products. Early notification of formulary changes, phased implementation of the policy, as well as information resources developed for patients and clinicians may have played a role in mitigating potential disruptions for this population.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48364,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Drug Policy","volume":"143 ","pages":"Article 104918"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the impact of the introduction of generic methadone to the Ontario public drug formulary\",\"authors\":\"Bisola Hamzat ,&nbsp;Tianru Wang ,&nbsp;Ria Garg ,&nbsp;Anita Iacono ,&nbsp;Mina Tadrous ,&nbsp;Fangyun Wu ,&nbsp;Jennifer Wyman ,&nbsp;Zoë Dodd ,&nbsp;Shauna Pinkerton ,&nbsp;Ashley Smoke ,&nbsp;Tara Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.drugpo.2025.104918\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Two new generic methadone products—Jamp-methadone and Odan-methadone—were added to Ontario’s public drug formulary in August 2022 and listed as interchangeable with the brand-name product, Methadose®. Concerns have been raised by people receiving methadone and their prescribers about potential risks of treatment destabilization as a result of switching between methadone-containing products.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a retrospective population-based time series analysis of weekly methadone claims in Ontario, Canada between January 5, 2017, and March 31, 2023. Using interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models, we assessed the impact of the formulary listing on product market-share, maximum dose dispensed, methadone discontinuation, and opioid toxicities.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The market share of Methadose® declined from 99.7 % to 52.3 % between the listing of generic methadone and March 2023, whereas generic products increased from 0.27 % to 40.0 % (Jamp-methadone) and 0.0 % to 7.7 % (Odan-methadone). We observed a significant short-term increase in the percentage of individuals dispensed methadone doses ≥130 mg (+1.30 %; 95 % CI: 0.85 %, 1.76 %) following formulary listing; however the introduction of generic methadone did not result in a significant change in methadone discontinuation among those stabilized (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.5) and not yet stabilized on treatment (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.7) or opioid-related toxicity events (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.1).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our findings did not indicate broad treatment destabilization or increased opioid-related toxicity among methadone recipients in the months following the introduction of generic products. Early notification of formulary changes, phased implementation of the policy, as well as information resources developed for patients and clinicians may have played a role in mitigating potential disruptions for this population.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48364,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"volume\":\"143 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104918\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Drug Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925002166\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SUBSTANCE ABUSE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Drug Policy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0955395925002166","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SUBSTANCE ABUSE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

两种新的美沙酮非专利产品- jamp -methadone和odan -methadone于2022年8月被添加到安大略省的公共药物处方中,并与品牌产品Methadose®可互换。接受美沙酮治疗的患者及其处方医生对在含美沙酮产品之间切换可能导致治疗不稳定的风险表示担忧。方法对2017年1月5日至2023年3月31日期间加拿大安大略省每周美沙酮索赔进行回顾性人群时间序列分析。使用介入自回归综合移动平均模型,我们评估了处方清单对产品市场份额、最大分配剂量、美沙酮停药和阿片类药物毒性的影响。结果美沙酮仿制药上市至2023年3月,美沙酮的市场占有率从99.7%下降到52.3%,而仿制药从0.27%上升到40.0% (jamp -美沙酮),从0.0%上升到7.7% (odan -美沙酮)。我们观察到,分配美沙酮剂量≥130 mg的个体百分比显着短期增加(+ 1.30%;95% CI: 0.85%, 1.76%);然而,非专利美沙酮的引入并未导致稳定患者美沙酮停药的显著变化(p >;0.5),治疗后尚未稳定(p >;0.7)或阿片类药物相关毒性事件(p >;0.1)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在引入仿制药后的几个月内,美沙酮接受者中没有广泛的治疗不稳定或阿片类药物相关毒性增加。处方变更的早期通知、政策的分阶段实施以及为患者和临床医生开发的信息资源可能在减轻对这一人群的潜在干扰方面发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Assessing the impact of the introduction of generic methadone to the Ontario public drug formulary

Background

Two new generic methadone products—Jamp-methadone and Odan-methadone—were added to Ontario’s public drug formulary in August 2022 and listed as interchangeable with the brand-name product, Methadose®. Concerns have been raised by people receiving methadone and their prescribers about potential risks of treatment destabilization as a result of switching between methadone-containing products.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective population-based time series analysis of weekly methadone claims in Ontario, Canada between January 5, 2017, and March 31, 2023. Using interventional autoregressive integrated moving average models, we assessed the impact of the formulary listing on product market-share, maximum dose dispensed, methadone discontinuation, and opioid toxicities.

Results

The market share of Methadose® declined from 99.7 % to 52.3 % between the listing of generic methadone and March 2023, whereas generic products increased from 0.27 % to 40.0 % (Jamp-methadone) and 0.0 % to 7.7 % (Odan-methadone). We observed a significant short-term increase in the percentage of individuals dispensed methadone doses ≥130 mg (+1.30 %; 95 % CI: 0.85 %, 1.76 %) following formulary listing; however the introduction of generic methadone did not result in a significant change in methadone discontinuation among those stabilized (p > 0.5) and not yet stabilized on treatment (p > 0.7) or opioid-related toxicity events (p > 0.1).

Conclusion

Our findings did not indicate broad treatment destabilization or increased opioid-related toxicity among methadone recipients in the months following the introduction of generic products. Early notification of formulary changes, phased implementation of the policy, as well as information resources developed for patients and clinicians may have played a role in mitigating potential disruptions for this population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
11.40%
发文量
307
审稿时长
62 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Drug Policy provides a forum for the dissemination of current research, reviews, debate, and critical analysis on drug use and drug policy in a global context. It seeks to publish material on the social, political, legal, and health contexts of psychoactive substance use, both licit and illicit. The journal is particularly concerned to explore the effects of drug policy and practice on drug-using behaviour and its health and social consequences. It is the policy of the journal to represent a wide range of material on drug-related matters from around the world.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信