Marco Allinovi, Matteo Accinno, Cecilia Finocchi, Tommaso Mazzierli, Leonardo Caroti, Daniela Lazzarini, Lorenzo Cosmi, Andrea Matucci, Marco Del Carria, Michael Diomaiuti, Calogero Lino Cirami, Francesco Peyronel, Alessandra Vultaggio
{"title":"膜性肾病患者尿中利妥昔单抗损失及治疗失败率。","authors":"Marco Allinovi, Matteo Accinno, Cecilia Finocchi, Tommaso Mazzierli, Leonardo Caroti, Daniela Lazzarini, Lorenzo Cosmi, Andrea Matucci, Marco Del Carria, Michael Diomaiuti, Calogero Lino Cirami, Francesco Peyronel, Alessandra Vultaggio","doi":"10.1093/ndt/gfaf127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rituximab is a first-line treatment for primary membranous nephropathy, but approximately one-third of patients fail to respond. Among the proposed mechanisms of rituximab resistance, urinary rituximab loss due to non-selective proteinuria could lead to drug underexposure and treatment failure. Although hypothesized, this has never been objectively measured with a practical and reproducible method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, observational study of 25 patients with biopsy-proven primary membranous nephropathy treated with rituximab (two infusions of 1 g, two weeks apart) at Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy. Rituximab levels were measured in serum and urine using a commercially available ELISA adapted for urinary samples. Urinary rituximab concentrations were assessed in 60 individuals to identify a threshold below which rituximab is considered not present in urine. Eight non-responders with urinary rituximab ≥2 µg/mL (potentially underexposed) received a second treatment course to test whether a higher rituximab dose would provide benefits in terms of kidney outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Urinary rituximab loss was associated with markers of disease severity, including lower eGFR (r= -0.50; p =0.01), higher proteinuria (r=0.46; p =0.02), and non-selective proteinuria (r=0.61; p =0.001). Patients with urinary rituximab ≥2 µg/mL had lower serum rituximab peak levels at 1 month (p=0.04), possibly reflecting drug underexposure, and significantly lower response rates (43% vs 100%, p=0.003). PLA2R antibody depletion was significantly more frequent in patients with lower urinary rituximab levels (80% vs 17%, p=0.008). In the re-treated subgroup, five of eight non-responders showing significant urinary rituximab loss and receiving a second course of treatment achieved clinical response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In primary membranous nephropathy, urinary rituximab loss is associated with disease severity, drug underexposure, and treatment failure. Measuring urinary rituximab could help identify patients at risk of resistance who could benefit from additional rituximab dosing. This approach could improve outcome prediction and support personalized immunosuppressive strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":520717,"journal":{"name":"Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Urinary rituximab loss and rate of treatment failure in membranous nephropathy.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Allinovi, Matteo Accinno, Cecilia Finocchi, Tommaso Mazzierli, Leonardo Caroti, Daniela Lazzarini, Lorenzo Cosmi, Andrea Matucci, Marco Del Carria, Michael Diomaiuti, Calogero Lino Cirami, Francesco Peyronel, Alessandra Vultaggio\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ndt/gfaf127\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Rituximab is a first-line treatment for primary membranous nephropathy, but approximately one-third of patients fail to respond. Among the proposed mechanisms of rituximab resistance, urinary rituximab loss due to non-selective proteinuria could lead to drug underexposure and treatment failure. Although hypothesized, this has never been objectively measured with a practical and reproducible method.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a prospective, observational study of 25 patients with biopsy-proven primary membranous nephropathy treated with rituximab (two infusions of 1 g, two weeks apart) at Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy. Rituximab levels were measured in serum and urine using a commercially available ELISA adapted for urinary samples. Urinary rituximab concentrations were assessed in 60 individuals to identify a threshold below which rituximab is considered not present in urine. Eight non-responders with urinary rituximab ≥2 µg/mL (potentially underexposed) received a second treatment course to test whether a higher rituximab dose would provide benefits in terms of kidney outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Urinary rituximab loss was associated with markers of disease severity, including lower eGFR (r= -0.50; p =0.01), higher proteinuria (r=0.46; p =0.02), and non-selective proteinuria (r=0.61; p =0.001). Patients with urinary rituximab ≥2 µg/mL had lower serum rituximab peak levels at 1 month (p=0.04), possibly reflecting drug underexposure, and significantly lower response rates (43% vs 100%, p=0.003). PLA2R antibody depletion was significantly more frequent in patients with lower urinary rituximab levels (80% vs 17%, p=0.008). In the re-treated subgroup, five of eight non-responders showing significant urinary rituximab loss and receiving a second course of treatment achieved clinical response.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In primary membranous nephropathy, urinary rituximab loss is associated with disease severity, drug underexposure, and treatment failure. Measuring urinary rituximab could help identify patients at risk of resistance who could benefit from additional rituximab dosing. This approach could improve outcome prediction and support personalized immunosuppressive strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520717,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf127\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nephrology, dialysis, transplantation : official publication of the European Dialysis and Transplant Association - European Renal Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfaf127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:利妥昔单抗是原发性膜性肾病的一线治疗药物,但大约三分之一的患者没有反应。在已提出的利妥昔单抗耐药机制中,非选择性蛋白尿导致尿中利妥昔单抗丢失可能导致药物暴露不足和治疗失败。虽然这是假设的,但从未用实际和可重复的方法客观地测量过。方法:我们在意大利佛罗伦萨Careggi大学医院对25例经活检证实的原发性膜性肾病患者进行了一项前瞻性观察性研究,患者接受了利妥昔单抗治疗(两次输注1g,间隔两周)。使用市售的适用于尿液样本的ELISA测定血清和尿液中的利妥昔单抗水平。对60例个体的尿中利妥昔单抗浓度进行了评估,以确定一个阈值,低于该阈值,利妥昔单抗被认为不存在于尿中。8例尿中利妥昔单抗≥2 μ g/mL(可能暴露不足)无反应的患者接受了第二个疗程,以测试更高的利妥昔单抗剂量是否会对肾脏预后有利。结果:尿中利妥昔单抗丢失与疾病严重程度标志物相关,包括eGFR降低(r= -0.50;P =0.01),高蛋白尿(r=0.46;P =0.02),非选择性蛋白尿(r=0.61;p = 0.001)。尿利妥昔单抗≥2µg/mL的患者在1个月时血清利妥昔单抗峰值水平较低(p=0.04),可能反映了药物暴露不足,且应答率明显较低(43% vs 100%, p=0.003)。PLA2R抗体耗损在尿中利妥昔单抗水平较低的患者中更为常见(80% vs 17%, p=0.008)。在再治疗亚组中,8名无反应者中有5名表现出明显的尿利妥昔单抗损失并接受第二疗程治疗,达到了临床反应。结论:在原发性膜性肾病中,尿中利妥昔单抗丢失与疾病严重程度、药物暴露不足和治疗失败相关。测量尿中的利妥昔单抗可以帮助识别有耐药风险的患者,这些患者可以从额外的利妥昔单抗剂量中获益。这种方法可以改善预后预测,并支持个性化的免疫抑制策略。
Urinary rituximab loss and rate of treatment failure in membranous nephropathy.
Background: Rituximab is a first-line treatment for primary membranous nephropathy, but approximately one-third of patients fail to respond. Among the proposed mechanisms of rituximab resistance, urinary rituximab loss due to non-selective proteinuria could lead to drug underexposure and treatment failure. Although hypothesized, this has never been objectively measured with a practical and reproducible method.
Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study of 25 patients with biopsy-proven primary membranous nephropathy treated with rituximab (two infusions of 1 g, two weeks apart) at Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy. Rituximab levels were measured in serum and urine using a commercially available ELISA adapted for urinary samples. Urinary rituximab concentrations were assessed in 60 individuals to identify a threshold below which rituximab is considered not present in urine. Eight non-responders with urinary rituximab ≥2 µg/mL (potentially underexposed) received a second treatment course to test whether a higher rituximab dose would provide benefits in terms of kidney outcomes.
Results: Urinary rituximab loss was associated with markers of disease severity, including lower eGFR (r= -0.50; p =0.01), higher proteinuria (r=0.46; p =0.02), and non-selective proteinuria (r=0.61; p =0.001). Patients with urinary rituximab ≥2 µg/mL had lower serum rituximab peak levels at 1 month (p=0.04), possibly reflecting drug underexposure, and significantly lower response rates (43% vs 100%, p=0.003). PLA2R antibody depletion was significantly more frequent in patients with lower urinary rituximab levels (80% vs 17%, p=0.008). In the re-treated subgroup, five of eight non-responders showing significant urinary rituximab loss and receiving a second course of treatment achieved clinical response.
Conclusions: In primary membranous nephropathy, urinary rituximab loss is associated with disease severity, drug underexposure, and treatment failure. Measuring urinary rituximab could help identify patients at risk of resistance who could benefit from additional rituximab dosing. This approach could improve outcome prediction and support personalized immunosuppressive strategies.