Jamie Furlong, David Fevyer, Ben Armstrong, Phil Edwards, Rachel Aldred, Anna Goodman
{"title":"伦敦低交通街区减少道路交通伤害:控制前后分析(2012-2024)。","authors":"Jamie Furlong, David Fevyer, Ben Armstrong, Phil Edwards, Rachel Aldred, Anna Goodman","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2015 and 2024, 113 Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) were implemented across Greater London, with 27 subsequently removed. We investigated their impacts on road traffic injuries inside LTNs and on 'boundary roads' immediately surrounding the LTNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We matched police-recorded injuries from STATS19 data to Ordnance Survey road links that were spatially intersected with LTNs/boundary roads. Conditional fixed-effects Poisson regression models used the number of injuries per road link per quarter of each year (January 2012 to June 2024) to test whether LTN implementation was associated with changes in injury rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LTN implementation was associated with a 35% (95% CI 29% to 40%; p<0.001) decrease in all injuries and a 37% (95% CI 24% to 48%; p<0.001) decrease in people Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI). Injuries decreased across a range of casualty and LTN characteristics. However, there was evidence of a smaller benefit in LTNs implemented in Outer London since 2020. Following the removal of an LTN, injury numbers increased back to pre-intervention levels. On boundary roads, there was no evidence of a change in total injury numbers (estimate -2%, 95% CI -5% to +2%) or KSI injury numbers (estimate 0%, 95% CI -7% to +8%). This reflected decreased numbers of injuries on boundary roads for cyclists and motorcyclists, and no change for pedestrians and other motor vehicle users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LTNs in London reduced road traffic injuries among all road users inside the LTN areas, with no evidence of overall impact (and for cyclists and motorcyclists a benefit) on boundary roads.</p>","PeriodicalId":520647,"journal":{"name":"Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low Traffic Neighbourhoods in London reduce road traffic injuries: a controlled before-and-after analysis (2012-2024).\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Furlong, David Fevyer, Ben Armstrong, Phil Edwards, Rachel Aldred, Anna Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ip-2024-045571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2015 and 2024, 113 Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) were implemented across Greater London, with 27 subsequently removed. We investigated their impacts on road traffic injuries inside LTNs and on 'boundary roads' immediately surrounding the LTNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We matched police-recorded injuries from STATS19 data to Ordnance Survey road links that were spatially intersected with LTNs/boundary roads. Conditional fixed-effects Poisson regression models used the number of injuries per road link per quarter of each year (January 2012 to June 2024) to test whether LTN implementation was associated with changes in injury rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LTN implementation was associated with a 35% (95% CI 29% to 40%; p<0.001) decrease in all injuries and a 37% (95% CI 24% to 48%; p<0.001) decrease in people Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI). Injuries decreased across a range of casualty and LTN characteristics. However, there was evidence of a smaller benefit in LTNs implemented in Outer London since 2020. Following the removal of an LTN, injury numbers increased back to pre-intervention levels. On boundary roads, there was no evidence of a change in total injury numbers (estimate -2%, 95% CI -5% to +2%) or KSI injury numbers (estimate 0%, 95% CI -7% to +8%). This reflected decreased numbers of injuries on boundary roads for cyclists and motorcyclists, and no change for pedestrians and other motor vehicle users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LTNs in London reduced road traffic injuries among all road users inside the LTN areas, with no evidence of overall impact (and for cyclists and motorcyclists a benefit) on boundary roads.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:2015年至2024年间,大伦敦地区实施了113个低交通街区(ltn),其中27个随后被拆除。我们调查了它们对ltn内部和ltn周围“边界道路”的道路交通伤害的影响。方法:我们将STATS19数据中警方记录的伤害与与ltn /边界道路在空间上相交的地形测量道路相匹配。条件固定效应泊松回归模型使用每年每个季度(2012年1月至2024年6月)每条道路的受伤人数来测试LTN的实施是否与受伤率的变化有关。结果:LTN实施与35% (95% CI 29%至40%;结论:伦敦的LTN减少了LTN区域内所有道路使用者的道路交通伤害,没有证据表明对边界道路有总体影响(骑自行车和骑摩托车的人受益)。
Low Traffic Neighbourhoods in London reduce road traffic injuries: a controlled before-and-after analysis (2012-2024).
Background: Between 2015 and 2024, 113 Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) were implemented across Greater London, with 27 subsequently removed. We investigated their impacts on road traffic injuries inside LTNs and on 'boundary roads' immediately surrounding the LTNs.
Methods: We matched police-recorded injuries from STATS19 data to Ordnance Survey road links that were spatially intersected with LTNs/boundary roads. Conditional fixed-effects Poisson regression models used the number of injuries per road link per quarter of each year (January 2012 to June 2024) to test whether LTN implementation was associated with changes in injury rates.
Results: LTN implementation was associated with a 35% (95% CI 29% to 40%; p<0.001) decrease in all injuries and a 37% (95% CI 24% to 48%; p<0.001) decrease in people Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI). Injuries decreased across a range of casualty and LTN characteristics. However, there was evidence of a smaller benefit in LTNs implemented in Outer London since 2020. Following the removal of an LTN, injury numbers increased back to pre-intervention levels. On boundary roads, there was no evidence of a change in total injury numbers (estimate -2%, 95% CI -5% to +2%) or KSI injury numbers (estimate 0%, 95% CI -7% to +8%). This reflected decreased numbers of injuries on boundary roads for cyclists and motorcyclists, and no change for pedestrians and other motor vehicle users.
Conclusion: LTNs in London reduced road traffic injuries among all road users inside the LTN areas, with no evidence of overall impact (and for cyclists and motorcyclists a benefit) on boundary roads.