伦敦低交通街区减少道路交通伤害:控制前后分析(2012-2024)。

Jamie Furlong, David Fevyer, Ben Armstrong, Phil Edwards, Rachel Aldred, Anna Goodman
{"title":"伦敦低交通街区减少道路交通伤害:控制前后分析(2012-2024)。","authors":"Jamie Furlong, David Fevyer, Ben Armstrong, Phil Edwards, Rachel Aldred, Anna Goodman","doi":"10.1136/ip-2024-045571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2015 and 2024, 113 Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) were implemented across Greater London, with 27 subsequently removed. We investigated their impacts on road traffic injuries inside LTNs and on 'boundary roads' immediately surrounding the LTNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We matched police-recorded injuries from STATS19 data to Ordnance Survey road links that were spatially intersected with LTNs/boundary roads. Conditional fixed-effects Poisson regression models used the number of injuries per road link per quarter of each year (January 2012 to June 2024) to test whether LTN implementation was associated with changes in injury rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LTN implementation was associated with a 35% (95% CI 29% to 40%; p<0.001) decrease in all injuries and a 37% (95% CI 24% to 48%; p<0.001) decrease in people Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI). Injuries decreased across a range of casualty and LTN characteristics. However, there was evidence of a smaller benefit in LTNs implemented in Outer London since 2020. Following the removal of an LTN, injury numbers increased back to pre-intervention levels. On boundary roads, there was no evidence of a change in total injury numbers (estimate -2%, 95% CI -5% to +2%) or KSI injury numbers (estimate 0%, 95% CI -7% to +8%). This reflected decreased numbers of injuries on boundary roads for cyclists and motorcyclists, and no change for pedestrians and other motor vehicle users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LTNs in London reduced road traffic injuries among all road users inside the LTN areas, with no evidence of overall impact (and for cyclists and motorcyclists a benefit) on boundary roads.</p>","PeriodicalId":520647,"journal":{"name":"Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Low Traffic Neighbourhoods in London reduce road traffic injuries: a controlled before-and-after analysis (2012-2024).\",\"authors\":\"Jamie Furlong, David Fevyer, Ben Armstrong, Phil Edwards, Rachel Aldred, Anna Goodman\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/ip-2024-045571\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Between 2015 and 2024, 113 Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) were implemented across Greater London, with 27 subsequently removed. We investigated their impacts on road traffic injuries inside LTNs and on 'boundary roads' immediately surrounding the LTNs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We matched police-recorded injuries from STATS19 data to Ordnance Survey road links that were spatially intersected with LTNs/boundary roads. Conditional fixed-effects Poisson regression models used the number of injuries per road link per quarter of each year (January 2012 to June 2024) to test whether LTN implementation was associated with changes in injury rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>LTN implementation was associated with a 35% (95% CI 29% to 40%; p<0.001) decrease in all injuries and a 37% (95% CI 24% to 48%; p<0.001) decrease in people Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI). Injuries decreased across a range of casualty and LTN characteristics. However, there was evidence of a smaller benefit in LTNs implemented in Outer London since 2020. Following the removal of an LTN, injury numbers increased back to pre-intervention levels. On boundary roads, there was no evidence of a change in total injury numbers (estimate -2%, 95% CI -5% to +2%) or KSI injury numbers (estimate 0%, 95% CI -7% to +8%). This reflected decreased numbers of injuries on boundary roads for cyclists and motorcyclists, and no change for pedestrians and other motor vehicle users.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>LTNs in London reduced road traffic injuries among all road users inside the LTN areas, with no evidence of overall impact (and for cyclists and motorcyclists a benefit) on boundary roads.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520647,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045571\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury prevention : journal of the International Society for Child and Adolescent Injury Prevention","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ip-2024-045571","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:2015年至2024年间,大伦敦地区实施了113个低交通街区(ltn),其中27个随后被拆除。我们调查了它们对ltn内部和ltn周围“边界道路”的道路交通伤害的影响。方法:我们将STATS19数据中警方记录的伤害与与ltn /边界道路在空间上相交的地形测量道路相匹配。条件固定效应泊松回归模型使用每年每个季度(2012年1月至2024年6月)每条道路的受伤人数来测试LTN的实施是否与受伤率的变化有关。结果:LTN实施与35% (95% CI 29%至40%;结论:伦敦的LTN减少了LTN区域内所有道路使用者的道路交通伤害,没有证据表明对边界道路有总体影响(骑自行车和骑摩托车的人受益)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Low Traffic Neighbourhoods in London reduce road traffic injuries: a controlled before-and-after analysis (2012-2024).

Background: Between 2015 and 2024, 113 Low Traffic Neighbourhoods (LTNs) were implemented across Greater London, with 27 subsequently removed. We investigated their impacts on road traffic injuries inside LTNs and on 'boundary roads' immediately surrounding the LTNs.

Methods: We matched police-recorded injuries from STATS19 data to Ordnance Survey road links that were spatially intersected with LTNs/boundary roads. Conditional fixed-effects Poisson regression models used the number of injuries per road link per quarter of each year (January 2012 to June 2024) to test whether LTN implementation was associated with changes in injury rates.

Results: LTN implementation was associated with a 35% (95% CI 29% to 40%; p<0.001) decrease in all injuries and a 37% (95% CI 24% to 48%; p<0.001) decrease in people Killed or Seriously Injured (KSI). Injuries decreased across a range of casualty and LTN characteristics. However, there was evidence of a smaller benefit in LTNs implemented in Outer London since 2020. Following the removal of an LTN, injury numbers increased back to pre-intervention levels. On boundary roads, there was no evidence of a change in total injury numbers (estimate -2%, 95% CI -5% to +2%) or KSI injury numbers (estimate 0%, 95% CI -7% to +8%). This reflected decreased numbers of injuries on boundary roads for cyclists and motorcyclists, and no change for pedestrians and other motor vehicle users.

Conclusion: LTNs in London reduced road traffic injuries among all road users inside the LTN areas, with no evidence of overall impact (and for cyclists and motorcyclists a benefit) on boundary roads.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信