药物覆盖政策和临床指南的一致性:大多数覆盖决定包括额外的限制。

Julia A Rucker, Molly T Beinfeld, Katherine A Clifford, Jonathan D Campbell, James Motyka, James D Chambers
{"title":"药物覆盖政策和临床指南的一致性:大多数覆盖决定包括额外的限制。","authors":"Julia A Rucker, Molly T Beinfeld, Katherine A Clifford, Jonathan D Campbell, James Motyka, James D Chambers","doi":"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01484","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Utilization management criteria influence patients' access to specialty drugs, yet the processes used by health plans to establish these criteria are not well understood. This study examined the alignment between clinical practice guidelines and plans' utilization management criteria. Using the Tufts Medicine Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database (December 2023), we reviewed US-based guidelines for 389 drug-indication pairs, excluding oncology and biosimilar treatments. We categorized guidelines as recommending or not recommending utilization management, based on alignment with each drug's Food and Drug Administration label-specifically, line of therapy and clinical requirements (for example, disease severity). We analyzed 5,699 coverage policies from eighteen large commercial health plans. When guidelines recommended utilization management, 67 percent of plans' coverage decisions aligned with the recommendation; when guidelines did not recommend utilization management, only 37 percent of decisions were consistent. Most plans imposed utilization management criteria (61 percent of all decisions), and plans were more likely to be consistent with guideline recommendations when utilization management was recommended, indicating a weak alignment with guideline recommendations.</p>","PeriodicalId":519943,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","volume":"44 7","pages":"839-845"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Drug Coverage Policies And Clinical Guidelines Alignment: Most Coverage Decisions Include Additional Restrictions.\",\"authors\":\"Julia A Rucker, Molly T Beinfeld, Katherine A Clifford, Jonathan D Campbell, James Motyka, James D Chambers\",\"doi\":\"10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01484\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Utilization management criteria influence patients' access to specialty drugs, yet the processes used by health plans to establish these criteria are not well understood. This study examined the alignment between clinical practice guidelines and plans' utilization management criteria. Using the Tufts Medicine Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database (December 2023), we reviewed US-based guidelines for 389 drug-indication pairs, excluding oncology and biosimilar treatments. We categorized guidelines as recommending or not recommending utilization management, based on alignment with each drug's Food and Drug Administration label-specifically, line of therapy and clinical requirements (for example, disease severity). We analyzed 5,699 coverage policies from eighteen large commercial health plans. When guidelines recommended utilization management, 67 percent of plans' coverage decisions aligned with the recommendation; when guidelines did not recommend utilization management, only 37 percent of decisions were consistent. Most plans imposed utilization management criteria (61 percent of all decisions), and plans were more likely to be consistent with guideline recommendations when utilization management was recommended, indicating a weak alignment with guideline recommendations.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":519943,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health affairs (Project Hope)\",\"volume\":\"44 7\",\"pages\":\"839-845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health affairs (Project Hope)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01484\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs (Project Hope)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01484","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

使用管理标准影响患者对特殊药物的获取,但健康计划用于建立这些标准的过程尚未得到很好的理解。本研究考察了临床实践指南和计划使用管理标准之间的一致性。使用Tufts医学专业药物证据和覆盖数据库(2023年12月),我们审查了美国389种药物适应证对的指南,不包括肿瘤和生物仿制药治疗。我们将指南分类为推荐或不推荐使用管理,基于与每种药物的食品和药物管理局标签的一致性-特别是治疗线和临床要求(例如,疾病严重程度)。我们分析了来自18个大型商业健康计划的5699份保险政策。当指南建议使用管理时,67%的计划覆盖决定与建议一致;当指南不建议使用管理时,只有37%的决策是一致的。大多数计划强加了利用管理标准(占所有决策的61%),当利用管理被推荐时,计划更有可能与指南建议一致,这表明了与指南建议的弱一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Drug Coverage Policies And Clinical Guidelines Alignment: Most Coverage Decisions Include Additional Restrictions.

Utilization management criteria influence patients' access to specialty drugs, yet the processes used by health plans to establish these criteria are not well understood. This study examined the alignment between clinical practice guidelines and plans' utilization management criteria. Using the Tufts Medicine Specialty Drug Evidence and Coverage Database (December 2023), we reviewed US-based guidelines for 389 drug-indication pairs, excluding oncology and biosimilar treatments. We categorized guidelines as recommending or not recommending utilization management, based on alignment with each drug's Food and Drug Administration label-specifically, line of therapy and clinical requirements (for example, disease severity). We analyzed 5,699 coverage policies from eighteen large commercial health plans. When guidelines recommended utilization management, 67 percent of plans' coverage decisions aligned with the recommendation; when guidelines did not recommend utilization management, only 37 percent of decisions were consistent. Most plans imposed utilization management criteria (61 percent of all decisions), and plans were more likely to be consistent with guideline recommendations when utilization management was recommended, indicating a weak alignment with guideline recommendations.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信