Monica Hernandez, Kristin G Maki, Hui Zhao, Iakovos Toumazis, Robert J Volk
{"title":"超过医疗保险最高年龄资格标准的成年人肺癌筛查。","authors":"Monica Hernandez, Kristin G Maki, Hui Zhao, Iakovos Toumazis, Robert J Volk","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0544","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Implications on the loss of lung cancer screening (LCS) coverage among Medicare recipients aged 77+ have not been explored. We use a 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) dataset to examine LCS patterns of screen-eligible adults across three age groups: 65-70, 71-77, 78-79 years. In descriptive analyses, LCS-eligible respondents are compared by screening status across each age category. In regression analyses, we explore various sociodemographic and health-related factors that may help explain age-related differences between these groups. Less than a third of our sample reported LCS in the last year (26.3%). Among eligible respondents, adults aged 78-79 reported the highest LCS rates (32.0%) followed by adults aged 71-77 years (28.3%) and 65-70 years (24.2%). Respondents aged 78-79 and 65-70 years with COPD indicated significantly increased LCS odds (respectively, OR=3.37 [1.12-10.11]; OR=2.91 [1.98-4.27]). Respondents aged 78-79 years with history of a heart attack or kidney disease indicated significantly decreased LCS odds (respectively, OR=0.08 [0.01-0.62]; OR=0.06 [0.01-0.56]). Respondents aged 71-77 years with coronary heart disease indicated a significantly decreased LCS odds (OR=0.54 [0.30-0.96]). Although loss of CMS coverage for LCS is not associated with lower screening among BRFSS adults aged 78-79 years, clinicians should continue to consider the appropriateness of treatment for older LCS eligible adults with chronic health conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lung Cancer Screening among Adults Older than Medicare's Upper Age Eligibility Criteria.\",\"authors\":\"Monica Hernandez, Kristin G Maki, Hui Zhao, Iakovos Toumazis, Robert J Volk\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0544\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Implications on the loss of lung cancer screening (LCS) coverage among Medicare recipients aged 77+ have not been explored. We use a 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) dataset to examine LCS patterns of screen-eligible adults across three age groups: 65-70, 71-77, 78-79 years. In descriptive analyses, LCS-eligible respondents are compared by screening status across each age category. In regression analyses, we explore various sociodemographic and health-related factors that may help explain age-related differences between these groups. Less than a third of our sample reported LCS in the last year (26.3%). Among eligible respondents, adults aged 78-79 reported the highest LCS rates (32.0%) followed by adults aged 71-77 years (28.3%) and 65-70 years (24.2%). Respondents aged 78-79 and 65-70 years with COPD indicated significantly increased LCS odds (respectively, OR=3.37 [1.12-10.11]; OR=2.91 [1.98-4.27]). Respondents aged 78-79 years with history of a heart attack or kidney disease indicated significantly decreased LCS odds (respectively, OR=0.08 [0.01-0.62]; OR=0.06 [0.01-0.56]). Respondents aged 71-77 years with coronary heart disease indicated a significantly decreased LCS odds (OR=0.54 [0.30-0.96]). Although loss of CMS coverage for LCS is not associated with lower screening among BRFSS adults aged 78-79 years, clinicians should continue to consider the appropriateness of treatment for older LCS eligible adults with chronic health conditions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0544\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-24-0544","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Lung Cancer Screening among Adults Older than Medicare's Upper Age Eligibility Criteria.
Implications on the loss of lung cancer screening (LCS) coverage among Medicare recipients aged 77+ have not been explored. We use a 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) dataset to examine LCS patterns of screen-eligible adults across three age groups: 65-70, 71-77, 78-79 years. In descriptive analyses, LCS-eligible respondents are compared by screening status across each age category. In regression analyses, we explore various sociodemographic and health-related factors that may help explain age-related differences between these groups. Less than a third of our sample reported LCS in the last year (26.3%). Among eligible respondents, adults aged 78-79 reported the highest LCS rates (32.0%) followed by adults aged 71-77 years (28.3%) and 65-70 years (24.2%). Respondents aged 78-79 and 65-70 years with COPD indicated significantly increased LCS odds (respectively, OR=3.37 [1.12-10.11]; OR=2.91 [1.98-4.27]). Respondents aged 78-79 years with history of a heart attack or kidney disease indicated significantly decreased LCS odds (respectively, OR=0.08 [0.01-0.62]; OR=0.06 [0.01-0.56]). Respondents aged 71-77 years with coronary heart disease indicated a significantly decreased LCS odds (OR=0.54 [0.30-0.96]). Although loss of CMS coverage for LCS is not associated with lower screening among BRFSS adults aged 78-79 years, clinicians should continue to consider the appropriateness of treatment for older LCS eligible adults with chronic health conditions.