医疗器械安全评估中操作员学习曲线检测与量化的统计框架

IF 1.3 Q4 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research Pub Date : 2025-07-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.2147/MDER.S520191
Henry C Ssemaganda, Sharon E Davis, Usha S Govindarajulu, Jejo D Koola, Jialin Mao, Dax Marek Westerman, Amy M Perkins, Theodore Speroff, Craig R Ramsay, Art Sedrakyan, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Michael E Matheny, Frederic S Resnic
{"title":"医疗器械安全评估中操作员学习曲线检测与量化的统计框架","authors":"Henry C Ssemaganda, Sharon E Davis, Usha S Govindarajulu, Jejo D Koola, Jialin Mao, Dax Marek Westerman, Amy M Perkins, Theodore Speroff, Craig R Ramsay, Art Sedrakyan, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Michael E Matheny, Frederic S Resnic","doi":"10.2147/MDER.S520191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Safety issues leading to patient harm and significant costs have been identified in several post-market medical devices. Recently, powerful learning effects (LE) have been documented in numerous medical devices. Correctly attributing safety signals to learning or device effects allows for appropriate corrective actions and recommendations to improve patient safety.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and assess the statistical performance of an analytic framework to detect the presence of LE and quantify the learning curve (LC).</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>We generated synthetic datasets based on observed clinical distributions and complex feature correlations among patients hospitalized at US Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. Each dataset represents a hypothetical early experience in the use of high-risk medical devices, with a device of interest and a reference device. The study blinded the analysis team to the data-generation process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed predictive models using generalized additive models and estimated LC parameters using the Levenberg-Marqualdt algorithm. We evaluated the performance using sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) in detecting the presence of LE and, if present, the goodness-of-fit of the estimated LC based on the root-mean squared error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2483 simulated datasets, the median (IQR) number of cases was 218,000 (116,000-353,000). LE were detected in 2065 of the 2291 datasets for which learning was specified (sensitivity: 90%; specificity: 88%; LR: 7). We adequately estimated the LC in 1632 (81%) of the 2013 datasets in which LE was detected and estimated LC.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrated the framework to be robust in disentangling LE from device safety signals and in estimating LC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In medical device safety evaluation, the operator-learning effects associated with the safety of medical devices can be effectively modeled and characterized. This study warrants subsequent framework validation by using real-world clinical datasets.</p>","PeriodicalId":47140,"journal":{"name":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","volume":"18 ","pages":"361-375"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230321/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Statistical Framework to Detect and Quantify Operator-Learning Curves in Medical Device Safety Evaluation.\",\"authors\":\"Henry C Ssemaganda, Sharon E Davis, Usha S Govindarajulu, Jejo D Koola, Jialin Mao, Dax Marek Westerman, Amy M Perkins, Theodore Speroff, Craig R Ramsay, Art Sedrakyan, Lucila Ohno-Machado, Michael E Matheny, Frederic S Resnic\",\"doi\":\"10.2147/MDER.S520191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Safety issues leading to patient harm and significant costs have been identified in several post-market medical devices. Recently, powerful learning effects (LE) have been documented in numerous medical devices. Correctly attributing safety signals to learning or device effects allows for appropriate corrective actions and recommendations to improve patient safety.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and assess the statistical performance of an analytic framework to detect the presence of LE and quantify the learning curve (LC).</p><p><strong>Design and setting: </strong>We generated synthetic datasets based on observed clinical distributions and complex feature correlations among patients hospitalized at US Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. Each dataset represents a hypothetical early experience in the use of high-risk medical devices, with a device of interest and a reference device. The study blinded the analysis team to the data-generation process.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We developed predictive models using generalized additive models and estimated LC parameters using the Levenberg-Marqualdt algorithm. We evaluated the performance using sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) in detecting the presence of LE and, if present, the goodness-of-fit of the estimated LC based on the root-mean squared error.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 2483 simulated datasets, the median (IQR) number of cases was 218,000 (116,000-353,000). LE were detected in 2065 of the 2291 datasets for which learning was specified (sensitivity: 90%; specificity: 88%; LR: 7). We adequately estimated the LC in 1632 (81%) of the 2013 datasets in which LE was detected and estimated LC.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This study demonstrated the framework to be robust in disentangling LE from device safety signals and in estimating LC.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In medical device safety evaluation, the operator-learning effects associated with the safety of medical devices can be effectively modeled and characterized. This study warrants subsequent framework validation by using real-world clinical datasets.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":47140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"volume\":\"18 \",\"pages\":\"361-375\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12230321/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S520191\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Devices-Evidence and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/MDER.S520191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

重要性:在一些上市后医疗器械中发现了导致患者伤害和重大成本的安全问题。最近,强大的学习效应(LE)已被记录在许多医疗设备中。正确地将安全信号归因于学习或设备效应,可以采取适当的纠正措施和建议,以提高患者的安全。目的:开发和评估一个分析框架的统计性能,以检测LE的存在并量化学习曲线(LC)。设计和设置:我们根据观察到的美国退伍军人事务部住院患者的临床分布和复杂特征相关性生成合成数据集。每个数据集代表使用高风险医疗器械的假设早期经验,具有感兴趣的设备和参考设备。这项研究使分析团队对数据生成过程视而不见。方法:采用广义加性模型建立预测模型,采用Levenberg-Marqualdt算法估计LC参数。我们使用灵敏度、特异性和似然比(LR)来评估检测LE存在的性能,如果存在,则基于均方根误差估计的LC的拟合优度。结果:在2483个模拟数据集中,病例中位数(IQR)为218000例(116000 - 353000例)。在指定学习的2291个数据集中,有2065个数据集检测到LE(灵敏度:90%;特异性:88%;LR: 7)。我们在2013年的1632个(81%)数据集中充分估计了LC,其中LE被检测到并估计了LC。讨论:本研究证明了该框架在从设备安全信号中分离LE和估计LC方面具有鲁棒性。结论:在医疗器械安全评价中,与医疗器械安全相关的操作者学习效应可以有效建模和表征。本研究通过使用真实世界的临床数据集保证后续的框架验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Statistical Framework to Detect and Quantify Operator-Learning Curves in Medical Device Safety Evaluation.

Importance: Safety issues leading to patient harm and significant costs have been identified in several post-market medical devices. Recently, powerful learning effects (LE) have been documented in numerous medical devices. Correctly attributing safety signals to learning or device effects allows for appropriate corrective actions and recommendations to improve patient safety.

Objective: To develop and assess the statistical performance of an analytic framework to detect the presence of LE and quantify the learning curve (LC).

Design and setting: We generated synthetic datasets based on observed clinical distributions and complex feature correlations among patients hospitalized at US Department of Veterans Affairs facilities. Each dataset represents a hypothetical early experience in the use of high-risk medical devices, with a device of interest and a reference device. The study blinded the analysis team to the data-generation process.

Methods: We developed predictive models using generalized additive models and estimated LC parameters using the Levenberg-Marqualdt algorithm. We evaluated the performance using sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratio (LR) in detecting the presence of LE and, if present, the goodness-of-fit of the estimated LC based on the root-mean squared error.

Results: Among the 2483 simulated datasets, the median (IQR) number of cases was 218,000 (116,000-353,000). LE were detected in 2065 of the 2291 datasets for which learning was specified (sensitivity: 90%; specificity: 88%; LR: 7). We adequately estimated the LC in 1632 (81%) of the 2013 datasets in which LE was detected and estimated LC.

Discussion: This study demonstrated the framework to be robust in disentangling LE from device safety signals and in estimating LC.

Conclusion: In medical device safety evaluation, the operator-learning effects associated with the safety of medical devices can be effectively modeled and characterized. This study warrants subsequent framework validation by using real-world clinical datasets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research
Medical Devices-Evidence and Research ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信